dissappointing tourney for Eichel, but at the same time he was clearly the most skilled player on his team, and by a good margin.
Id have to disagree and say most skilled was Larkin. He impressed me more than Eichel did.
dissappointing tourney for Eichel, but at the same time he was clearly the most skilled player on his team, and by a good margin.
Eichel was fine. Could see the skill on display even if the points weren't there.
Eichel was fine. Could see the skill on display even if the points weren't there.
dissappointing tourney for Eichel, but at the same time he was clearly the most skilled player on his team, and by a good margin.
Some scouts were saying Matthews would be in the discussion with Mac and Eichel this year, sorry to say but I saw nothing as to where he'd be in the discussion, nothing and I watched every US game.
As far as Eichel goes, he seems to be more style rather than substance, the Getzlaf comparisons suddenlydon't make sense, Getz is an elite playmaker, Eichel wouldn't pass the puck unless his life depended on it.
The USA played better though. The Shots tell you that.
It was close on the scoreboard. Canada carried play from start to finish. It was clear as day who the better team was.
And yet USA could have won if a call went differently. What I'm saying is that a lot can happen in a game
He made some of the same kinds of mistakes McDavid is making, losing the puck here and there, turning the puck over a bit...
People have to look past that and watch how they see the ice and generate chances.
Eichel will be a star in the NHL for years to come. He just needs big-game experience and a little more confidence.
Some of you just see what you want and not what actually happened. Eichel had four points in five games playing against some players two drafts ahead of him. He was completely dominant during some stretches and set up many teammates with grade A chances many times that weren't finished. He had a good tournament.
Right he was decent in the first. I just forgot about that because he was invisible in the 2nd and 3rd.
I cannot believe people are blaming Eichel.
Eloquently summing up the GDT: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=94943653&postcount=949
Congrats to the Russians for hanging (and moving) on.
Some puzzling moves by management in hindsight. Giving him the "C" was probably one of them- along with rolling with such a young blueline. Eichel didn't need the added weight.
I agree that the USA were the better side, however shots don't always tell the story, especially when the Russians are involved![]()
And yet USA could have won if a call went differently. What I'm saying is that a lot can happen in a game
when was there a good one? (besides Swiss)...the rest were pretty bad, with the exception of 1,5 vs Sweden. The one vs Czech was horrid.
The problem is, except against Switzerland, there has been no offense. The puck was in the Russian zone because we couldn't get it out and bring it down to the American zone. Good goaltending prevented a loss, which is becoming the continuing story when Russia doesn't lose.
They were outshot in that game by a margin and the call in the game was the right one.
Wait, so you're telling me the Russians are just like the Leafs!!!![]()