GDT: Quarterfinal • Jan. 2 • USA vs. Russia • II [MOD #571]

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
dissappointing tourney for Eichel, but at the same time he was clearly the most skilled player on his team, and by a good margin.

Id have to disagree and say most skilled was Larkin. He impressed me more than Eichel did.
 
I was there. I liked it even though I'm not of either team. The Russians played a structure game where as the USA more used their talent individually. The USA played better though. The Shots tell you that. But, the amount of penalties that the USA took in the beginning ultimately killed them


EDIT: And seeing Eichel live today, I saw his great talent first hand. HE twice walked through 3 or 4 Russians out of time. Also how in this world did Miles Wood get on this USA team. He is brutal.
 
Eichel was fine. Could see the skill on display even if the points weren't there.

He made some of the same kinds of mistakes McDavid is making, losing the puck here and there, turning the puck over a bit...

People have to look past that and watch how they see the ice and generate chances.

Eichel will be a star in the NHL for years to come. He just needs big-game experience and a little more confidence.
 
Eloquently summing up the GDT: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=94943653&postcount=949

Congrats to the Russians for hanging (and moving) on.

dissappointing tourney for Eichel, but at the same time he was clearly the most skilled player on his team, and by a good margin.

Some puzzling moves by management in hindsight. Giving him the "C" was probably one of them- along with rolling with such a young blueline. Eichel didn't need the added weight.
 
Some scouts were saying Matthews would be in the discussion with Mac and Eichel this year, sorry to say but I saw nothing as to where he'd be in the discussion, nothing and I watched every US game.

Would Marner have been in the conversation with Eichel and McDavid this time last year? Of course not. Any appropriate comparison between Marner and Matthews should be done when comparing Marner's draft season and Matthews' draft season (and, yes, it's stupid if people are talking about Matthews with Eichel/McDavid).

Also, Matthews was rather good over these last two games. I think he uses his body like Thornton to shield the puck (Obligatory HF Disclaimer: I'm not saying he's the next Thornton, just that he has that trait.)


As far as Eichel goes, he seems to be more style rather than substance, the Getzlaf comparisons suddenlydon't make sense, Getz is an elite playmaker, Eichel wouldn't pass the puck unless his life depended on it.

Your criticism over Eichel is overblown and is largely based on a short tourney. Also, Getzlaf wasn't exactly the bee's knees in his draft year, if you recall. He had warts. It's possible for these guys to improve. But, in terms of raw ability, Eichel is excellent.
 
I agree with the consensus that Eichel played a selfish game and tried to force the play too much. I doubt it will be a problem in the NHL when he both matures and plays with teammates longer than 2 weeks. That being said I was impressed with Matthews and Hanefin all tournament.
 
And yet USA could have won if a call went differently. What I'm saying is that a lot can happen in a game

Of course a lot can happen which is why the tournament is a bit of a crapshoot, but this team got what it deserved.

They weren't good Wednesday and they weren't good today, and they lost both games.
 
He made some of the same kinds of mistakes McDavid is making, losing the puck here and there, turning the puck over a bit...

People have to look past that and watch how they see the ice and generate chances.

Eichel will be a star in the NHL for years to come. He just needs big-game experience and a little more confidence.

Size, speed, skill, vision.

Can definitely see where the hype comes from.
 
Some of you just see what you want and not what actually happened. Eichel had four points in five games playing against some players two drafts ahead of him. He was completely dominant during some stretches and set up many teammates with grade A chances many times that weren't finished. He had a good tournament.

When people call you a generational talent and everyone talks about how you will dominate the tournament, the expectations are a bit higher than normal.
 
Right he was decent in the first. I just forgot about that because he was invisible in the 2nd and 3rd.

I cannot believe people are blaming Eichel.

I don't think most people are blaming Eichal for the loss today, I know I haven't. If you want to point to one thing that is most responsible for the loss it's the undisciplined penalties which led to their 1st and 3rd goals and their second goal was right after the penalty expired ... and I don't think Eichal was one of the guys that took a penalty, at least I don't recall him being penalized in this game.

My "criticism" of Eichal was due to the hype of him as a player. With the high expectations come a higher standard to meet and I thought he showed his overall skill and I have no douvt he is a great player and will have a very good pro career, but I thought he tried too hard to be the difference maker and didn't let the game come to him as much as he could have / should have. Consequently he didn't help his team as much as he could have / should have. That's all - great player that didn't play up to the heightened expectations.
 
when was there a good one? (besides Swiss)...the rest were pretty bad, with the exception of 1,5 vs Sweden. The one vs Czech was horrid.

The problem is, except against Switzerland, there has been no offense. The puck was in the Russian zone because we couldn't get it out and bring it down to the American zone. Good goaltending prevented a loss, which is becoming the continuing story when Russia doesn't lose.
 
One player has a grinder and a very young and very raw powerforward as his linemates. That player is a captain, is consistently matched up with the opponents' best, and is the only consistent offensive threat on his whole team.

This other player plays behind an elite two-way center who was a recent top-2 pick. He never has to play against the opponents' best. He plays on a line with his team's 19 year old two-way captain, who is a natural center and has 30 games of NHL experience, and another recent top-10 pick.

These players perform at about the same level, except one is roasted alive and the other is celebrated. I'll let you guess which player is which.

That's all I gotta say. I'm not disappointed in the US's play outside of the very stupid penalties, particularly the Collins one that resulted in the 5v3. The game-winner was a flukey own-goal. If we had to lose I'm glad it was to the Russians, whom I always root for. The coaching could have been better, the line combos could have been better, the roster selection process could have been better, but it is what it is. While I'm disappointed with the result, I'm not disappointed in how the team played. Anything can happen in a single-elimination tournament and that's what happened today. Bad luck. Oh well. Move on.

And stop blaming Eichel, for god's sake.
 
This is by no means an indictment on Eichel, but having coached so many years, I would never put the C on the "Best Player" because psychologically it does something to the player from what I've found over the years.

You put the "C" on the energy, grinding player who has leadership ability. There is 'zero' pressure on that kid to do too much, all it does it enhances his capabilities to bring more energy which helps the team.

That is a Coaching decision that I thought was wrong and I blame them along with the team having almost 'zero' chemistry outside of the pre-tournament games.

It was almost like a "switch" was turned on during the games that actually mattered that turned all of our players into selfish players that tried to do too much.

Plus, whatever system they were running appeared to 'suck' all the creativity out of players like Eichel and Mathews and Milano (who I thought was absolutely terrible this WJ)

Anyway, fire the coaching staff, bring in someone outside of the College Community, someone suggested Bylsma, and I guess he'd be ok, and team USA needs to bring the "right" players.

As stated by a few posters, Wood/Louis and several other players needed to be replaced by other players that would have done a better job complimenting the better players.
 
The problem is, except against Switzerland, there has been no offense. The puck was in the Russian zone because we couldn't get it out and bring it down to the American zone. Good goaltending prevented a loss, which is becoming the continuing story when Russia doesn't lose.

that is our recipe for beating US and Canada. They always overpower us. Great goaltending along with counter attacks and PP is the key here. We won't be able to force the play on these teams.
 
Wait, so you're telling me the Russians are just like the Leafs!!!:amazed::laugh:
:laugh: Except they have some medals to back it up, Toronto need to end that Cup drought buddy :( In the 2011 (Gold),2013 (Silver) and 2013 (Bronze) WJC Russia out-shot their opponents something like 4/21 games. :laugh: 1/7 on the Gold medal run :laugh:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad