GDT: Quarter Final: Canada Vs Slovakia | 9AM EST 3PM CET | CAN 6 - 1 SVK

[snipes]

Woooo!!!!

Lafreniere to Hayton

 

[End on a Hinote]

Right on boys!

 

[Dala]

How did you guys even get the puck for more than a minute in this game? Oh.

You guys?

Edit: nice goal by Hayton, Chayka found a gem.

 

[TheBeastCoast]

Run it down their throat now. Let's go boys.

 

[jj cale]

Goal!!

that's the way to get things back on track after killing that off.

 

[Star Ocean]

That #11 guy seems good.

best player of the tournament.

 

[Dominance]

Just like that.

 

[BruinsBtn]

How did the refs "miss" the two very obvious high sticks? Come on.

The first one was a follow-through on a backhand. That's not a penalty. The second one was a bit tough to see without the benefit of replay.

 

[TimeZone]

best player of the tournament.

I know lol if was a joke.

Laffy is my favorite prospect.

 

[jj cale]

Le Gros Alex !!

 

[wacko2]

Laughable Slovakian coverage on that goal.

 

[BigBadBoar]

The Foote 5+20 penalty was clearly was a wrong call. However, then there were 2 clear high sticking fouls by Canada which the refs missed. The refs are simply bad on both sides.

 

[Melkor]

Slovaks look like they have no business playing in the elite division, let alone the playoffs.

 

[snipes]

Laf is flying out there. I absolutely love the physical element to his game.

 

[bert]

Literally every second shift there is a player rolling around on the ice crying, and usually the refs buy it. I don't even wanna watch this

Agreed, the refs lead us to this behavior by calling things that arent penalties and rewarding the cowardly act of rolling around on the ice. This isnt soccer.

These refs simply do not know the rules. I saw them call a double minor for high sticking on a follow through of a shot. Thats not a penalty. Its incredible how bad these refs have been in every facet.

 

[tobu]

The first one was a follow-through on a backhand. That's not a penalty. The second one was a bit tough to see without the benefit of replay.

Correct me if I am wrong, but follow through high sticks in IIHF rules are still to be called. Second one was also a clear high stick according to replay.

 

[Machinehead]

They scored while I was getting my toast

 

[TheBeastCoast]

Laf is flying out there. I absolutely love the physical element to his game.

He has a what is now a unique fire to his game that you don't see in a lot of elite talent anymore.

 

[BruinsBtn]

The Foote 5+20 penalty was clearly was a wrong call. However, then there were 2 clear high sticking fouls by Canada which the refs missed. The refs are simply bad on both sides.

A follow through on a shot isn't a high stick.

 

[Svedu]

This Slovakian team is actually worse than Kazakhstan. I honestly believe Kazakhstan would win a rematch. They had some kind of a structure in their game plan at least.
Sweden will be the only team from their group to play the semifinals.

 

[jj cale]

The Foote 5+20 penalty was clearly was a wrong call. However, then there were 2 clear high sticking fouls by Canada which the refs missed. The refs are simply bad on both sides.

it's over and done with, let's move on.

 

[GoCaps2004]

The first one was a follow-through on a backhand. That's not a penalty. The second one was a bit tough to see without the benefit of replay.

iirc, in IIHF play, a high stick on a follow through is still a penalty, which differs from the NHL rule

 

[Star Ocean]

Slovaks look like they have no business playing in the elite division, let alone the playoffs.

they gooned it up vs sweden in 3rd period, i did not like their antics.

 

[Spearmint Rhino]

How did the refs "miss" the two very obvious high sticks? Come on.

Maybe not impressed with the post embellishment. Patient is flatlined after the high stick, puck comes to him and he’s resurrected briefly to take a shot on net then sadly fall backs into a terminal coma after taking the shot

 

[End on a Hinote]

You guys are showing class.

Damned if we do, damned if we don't.