What is the matter with Kreider?
Is he lazy, a bust?
I don't understand how again he is not solidified.
Just out of curiosity, and you must be seeing something that I am not at all, what do you base that statement on ? Merely looking to get educated.
Kreider has, with a lot of Rangers, had a very underwhelming pre-season, and this is a guy that needed to develop from the previous season to obtain a spot in the roster. He has, by my judgement at least, not done that.
What is the matter with Kreider?
Is he lazy, a bust?
I don't understand how again he is not solidified.
He's just not that bright imo. He doesn't know where to be, he can't read plays. Every once in a while when he does read a situation properly, he looks fantastic, because he has all the skill and physical attributes to be an elite NHL player. But he's just an idiot, and I'm not sure you can teach hockey IQ. He's especially bad defensively but that would be a non-factor if his offense was going, just put him on the Stepan line.
In any case I will be pretty upset if at any point we see Chris Kreider at the expense of JT Miller. I'm a huge fan of his, and his game in preseason looked so refined. He plays beyond his age and I love his work ethic, two way ability and physicality. As long as he can keep the turnovers under control and keep being smart with the puck, he absolutely should be on this team.
I think he's too bright and thinking too much out there. When he lets his instincts take over his skill set really shows through.
I like Miller a lot too
Sather has always had a simplistic view of the world. When the Rangers acquired Lindros in 2011,Sather had Lindros checked by a concussion specialist in Montreal. Lindros passed all of the tests and was given a clean bill of health. When they asked Sather about the 6 documented concussions,he said the doctor said he is fine. He didn't believe in one concussion making a player more at risk for another concussion. Eric had at least 6. Lindros lasted not even 3 months before he got concussed by bumping into Mark Smith in San Jose. It wasn't a hard hit.
Same thing with Richards. According to Slats,Richards was negotiating the CBA and that's why he struggled last season. He attended a few meetings. The last meeting I think he attended was in early December when Bettman and Daly did there "we will die on the hill for 5 years contract term limits". No meetings took place again until New Years Eve and that first week in January. Richards was in PEI for the holidays.
The Rangers are stuck with him for another year and they better hope Richards doesn't suffer an injury which prevents the buyout.
Sather has always had a simplistic view of the world. When the Rangers acquired Lindros in 2011,Sather had Lindros checked by a concussion specialist in Montreal. Lindros passed all of the tests and was given a clean bill of health. When they asked Sather about the 6 documented concussions,he said the doctor said he is fine. He didn't believe in one concussion making a player more at risk for another concussion. Eric had at least 6. Lindros lasted not even 3 months before he got concussed by bumping into Mark Smith in San Jose. It wasn't a hard hit.
Same thing with Richards. According to Slats,Richards was negotiating the CBA and that's why he struggled last season. He attended a few meetings. The last meeting I think he attended was in early December when Bettman and Daly did there "we will die on the hill for 5 years contract term limits". No meetings took place again until New Years Eve and that first week in January. Richards was in PEI for the holidays.
The Rangers are stuck with him for another year and they better hope Richards doesn't suffer an injury which prevents the buyout.
There is a little perspective on this issue though.
This year teams had no space, still Streit, Lecav, Clowe and co got insane deals. In the coming years, teams will get space but due to the big pile of long term contracts signed the last handful of years, very few good players will end up hitting the market.
We are where we are today because Slats signed the 4 previous big name UFAs that he did, right? Without the Drury, Gomez, Redden and Gabby signing we don't have McD, Brassard, John Moore and Dorsett. That is a big part of our lineups, and those signings where as a whole pretty disasterous.
Its not good to pay Brad Richards 6.8m per. But as long as he doesn't become a complete disaster, but scores like at a 60 pts pace, maybe its worth keeping him around due to the fact that the options turns out to be worse.
OTOH, there is definitely a risk of him becoming a complete disaster. It depends on him and the environment we provide him with.
So how do you identify which players get the bridge and which players to commit to long term?
"That's a tough question," said Rangers assistant GM Jeff Gorton, talking in general terms and not about Stepan. "In this day and age, we have a cap team and having the type of players that we have on our team, making the kind of money we have, sometimes it's circumstance more than the player."
And that's what is happening with the Rangers right now. They clearly like Stepan, but they are squeezed financially, which makes the bridge deal the preferred course of action.
"You only have that much money to go around," Gorton said. "It's hard. It's just the reality of the situation. Sometimes guys have to wait. That's just the way it is."
Can't we just waive Richards? Or is there a problem I don't see ? ...
A no-move clause means a player cannot be traded, waived for a claim by another team, or assigned to the minors without his consent. This does not protect the player from a buyout.
PK Pilot 76 said:I think that Kreider and Miller both make the team while Cally and Hags are out, but as soon as one is ready (and I think Cally is gonna play in the opener) it will be Miller who makes it over Kreider. He simply looks better and brings more intensity..
Fast has, for the most part, impressed, but I just don't think there's room for him to make the team this season. He will be here next year, probably in Pouliot's spot.
wondering if some knowledgable fans can point me in the right direction here.
What the PP situation looking like this year? Is McD finally gonna get some 1st PP time? Or will MDZ hog everything with richards? Or is Girardi more likely to get PP time than McD?
thanks
It's a bit up in the air. AV/Arniel wants a good balance of RH and LH shots on the PP, which I agree with. But they have continued trotting out Girardi there during pre-season and he has no business on an AHL PP, let alone an NHL one.
It does however look like they are reluctant to put a forward on the point, so my guess is that MDZ, Strålman, McD, Staal will see the bulk of the PP time once they figure out that Girardi plays enough minutes as is. No reason to tire him out on the PP when he isn't contributing there anyway.
I think Moore is going to get time. Probably the best shot of the defensemen.
Richards will be given a ~20 game tryout, if he is still the same shell of his former self they will force him to sit out the season.
So basically he has the skills, it's not the work ethic, it's learning the game?He's just not that bright imo. He doesn't know where to be, he can't read plays. Every once in a while when he does read a situation properly, he looks fantastic, because he has all the skill and physical attributes to be an elite NHL player. But he's just an idiot, and I'm not sure you can teach hockey IQ. He's especially bad defensively but that would be a non-factor if his offense was going, just put him on the Stepan line.
In any case I will be pretty upset if at any point we see Chris Kreider at the expense of JT Miller. I'm a huge fan of his, and his game in preseason looked so refined. He plays beyond his age and I love his work ethic, two way ability and physicality. As long as he can keep the turnovers under control and keep being smart with the puck, he absolutely should be on this team.