CandyCanes
Caniac turned Jerkiac
- Jan 8, 2015
- 7,667
- 26,727
the young centers were the highlight of the team. Robidas needs to mass but his motor is awesome. He'll be the next Rod man crush.
First line Martinook level of man crush?
the young centers were the highlight of the team. Robidas needs to mass but his motor is awesome. He'll be the next Rod man crush.
Still boggles my mind we won the freaking Jennings trophy with Cole/Smith anchoring the bottom pair. Smith was good for like 1 unforced turnover a period. Our forwards are right up there with Boston's and dare I say New York's for consistent backchecking. Slavin was there too.
Defense version of Martinook, great AHL depth on a contender.What What are people’s thoughts on Chatfield these two games?
He is a Robidas so it’ll be a first pair level crushFirst line Martinook level of man crush?
Defense version of Martinook, great AHL depth on a contender.
I’ve seen a lot of Twitter folks penciling CDH in on the third pair, gotta think his health is still a bit of a question mark right? 29, 44 and 61 GP the past three seasons. I know Rod likes to have a vet to anchor the 3rd pairing but I just don’t have a ton of faith in him. If CDH can stay healthy and play 60+ games I would consider him and Cole a wash.
CDH at least knows how to stay out of the box, I guess.
I think people should also prepare themselves for the very real possibility that we just roll with Bear and Coghlan is the 7... The team won't put as much stock into preseason as us.
Coghlan making the team would send what was already a terrible trade for Vegas into next level awfulness. Remember, they threw in Coghlan as a sweetener in the Patches for literally nothing trade. You're talking about the possibility of 2 everyday players for literally nothing in an offseason trade.
Oof
Coghlan making the team would send what was already a terrible trade for Vegas into next level awfulness. Remember, they threw in Coghlan as a sweetener in the Patches for literally nothing trade. You're talking about the possibility of 2 everyday players for literally nothing in an offseason trade.
Oof
Coghlan making the team would send what was already a terrible trade for Vegas into next level awfulness. Remember, they threw in Coghlan as a sweetener in the Patches for literally nothing trade. You're talking about the possibility of 2 everyday players for literally nothing in an offseason trade.
Oof
I seriously doubt they’ll lose any sleep over it. Smith is a hidden component of their equation; Pacioretty needed to go to bring him back. They couldn’t make both work largely because of the Eichel trade. They wouldn’t undo that just to avoid “losing” a Pacioretty trade.
I seriously doubt they’ll lose any sleep over it. Smith is a hidden component of their equation; Pacioretty needed to go to bring him back. They couldn’t make both work largely because of the Eichel trade. They wouldn’t undo that just to avoid “losing” a Pacioretty trade.
Which is fine....
Until you realized they didn't even try to get anything back for getting rid of Patches, who very much still has value in the league. And not only did they not give up value, they gave away a relatively young everyday NHL RHD with decent to good offensive upside to convince a contending team to take on Patches, and got literally nothing in return.
Even if they needed to rid themselves of Pacioretty, they should have gotten something back for him, especially if they were also including an everyday contributing NHL RHD.
Which is fine....
Until you realized they didn't even try to get anything back for getting rid of Patches, who very much still has value in the league. And not only did they not give up value, they gave away a relatively young everyday NHL RHD with decent to good offensive upside to convince a contending team to take on Patches, and got literally nothing in return.
Even if they needed to rid themselves of Pacioretty, they should have gotten something back for him, especially if they were also including an everyday contributing NHL RHD.
At least we got something for FoxI don’t think you can say that with certainty. Oliver Bjorkstrand, a better asset all around, went for trivial positive value. Moving $7 mil at that moment most likely was a pita, particularly with his trade protection.
The larger point I’m getting at is that trades aren’t zero sum. If they were, the Adam Fox deal would be one of the worst in recent memory. We know it isn’t. This one may turn out to be a good trade for the Canes, but that says nothing about Vegas. They’re two independent evaluations.
I don’t think you can say that with certainty. Oliver Bjorkstrand, a better asset all around, went for trivial positive value. Moving $7 mil at that moment most likely was a pita, particularly with his trade protection.
The larger point I’m getting at is that trades aren’t zero sum. If they were, the Adam Fox deal would be one of the worst in recent memory. We know it isn’t. This one may turn out to be a good trade for the Canes, but that says nothing about Vegas. They’re two independent evaluations.
I don’t think you can say that with certainty. Oliver Bjorkstrand, a better asset all around, went for trivial positive value. Moving $7 mil at that moment most likely was a pita, particularly with his trade protection.
The larger point I’m getting at is that trades aren’t zero sum. If they were, the Adam Fox deal would be one of the worst in recent memory. We know it isn’t. This one may turn out to be a good trade for the Canes, but that says nothing about Vegas. They’re two independent evaluations.