Adtar02
@NateThompson44 is a bum
I think they are trying to see how flexible he is. Giroux was a rw when he came up. So was farabeeNot sure of the purpose of MM on left wing.
I think they are trying to see how flexible he is. Giroux was a rw when he came up. So was farabeeNot sure of the purpose of MM on left wing.
How’s your backend look?Whole backend looks terrible
MM has played 0 NHL games. Just let him stay where is at.I think they are trying to see how flexible he is. Giroux was a rw when he came up. So was farabee
I can confirmNot sure if this was talked about on here yet or not, but I just noticed YouTubeTV has NBCSP and NBCSP+. Not sure when that happened, I must have missed it. It used to just be Hulu Live that had it, so options seem to be expanding. Keep in mind you do need to be "local" to Philly area to get those channels. I assume a VPN might work, but can't confirm.
Not sure of the purpose of MM on left wing.
If Frost doesn't play with either TK or Michkov, I'm going to loose my mind.I like it.
Farabee/Foerster Couts TK
TIppett Frost Michkov
Foerster/Farabee Laughton Brink
vs
Michkov Couts TK
Tippett Frost Foerster
Farabee Laughton Brink
I think it would make the 2nd line a lot more balanced.
He still needs more jamIf Frost doesn't play with either TK or Michkov, I'm going to loose my mind.
If Frost doesn't play with either TK or Michkov, I'm going to loose my mind.
Briere said it best, chemistry is unpredictable.Seeing Michkov play LW tonight caused me to try thinking of how to unjam the RW a bit and optimize the wingers to be more in their natural position. I don't know if it makes the top 6 better or worse. I can't figure out where Foerster fits on the lines as LW or RW with Michkov playing RW or LW (respectively). He's who I have trouble projecting the most. I think Farabee-Laughton-Brink is a lock for the 3rd line, as Farabee/Brink are showing good early chemistry. We'll see more of them tonight.
I'd do something like this, not like it matters to anyone who can actually make a change.Seeing Michkov play LW tonight caused me to try thinking of how to unjam the RW a bit and optimize the wingers to be more in their natural position. I don't know if it makes the top 6 better or worse. I can't figure out where Foerster fits on the lines as LW or RW with Michkov playing RW or LW (respectively). He's who I have trouble projecting the most. I think Farabee-Laughton-Brink is a lock for the 3rd line, as Farabee/Brink are showing good early chemistry. We'll see more of them tonight.
FLYERS: 2-1-0
BRUINS: 1-2-0
Boston Bruins - Philadelphia Flyers - Sep 28, 2024 | NHL.com
NHL Gamecenter - Boston Bruins vs. Philadelphia Flyers, Sep 28, 2024 - summary, stats, boxscore, play by play, recap and more.www.nhl.com
View attachment 910436
BROADCAST
NHLN
NBCSP+ (Commonly also televised)
Maybe 97.5 FM?
FLYERS LINEUP
TBD, but probably not the demoted guys
BRUINS LINEUP
Also TBD
GDT SONG
How would you have both PP lineups?I'd do something like this, not like it matters to anyone who can actually make a change.
Farabee-Couts-TK
Brink-Frost-Michkov
Tippett-Laughton-Foerster
Better tighten it nowIf Frost doesn't play with either TK or Michkov, I'm going to loose my mind.
I know you say it works, but the numbers indicate that Frost was much better with TK.I would not break up Tippett - Frost, "it it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Pp1How would you have both PP lineups?
I know you say it works, but the numbers indicate that Frost was much better with TK.
Medvedev and Bunnaman wore 82 with the Flyers in the last decade.So
Who’s 82?
Big tall Fedovtov
Never think I seen 82 used before