Wallet Inspector
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 6,168
- 5,615
And they did add stability, by subtracting Ceci.We all know they wanted to get rid of Ceci, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Again, I didn't say that Ceci was good, I said the Oilers needed to add stability and they added more question marks instead. The question is, did the Oilers improve on defence? I have a hard time believing the answer is yes, even though Ceci was bad.
We all know they wanted to get rid of Ceci, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Again, I didn't say that Ceci was good, I said the Oilers needed to add stability and they added more question marks instead. The question is, did the Oilers improve on defence? I have a hard time believing the answer is yes, even though Ceci was bad.
here is the splits 5on5 over last 2 years for nurse and ceci. feel free to keep talking about how much of a loss he isYeah, you're sort of overlooking the key factor here, which is that Ceci was usually partnered with Nurse. Has he been partnered with Ekholm, those numbers would be 10 points higher.
You'll note that every Oilers' D whom they tried with Nurse suddenly looked worse with Nurse.
Ceci is a good NHL defenceman and did a great job with Edmonton. He's going to have some long nights with San Jose next year, but he'll also help settle that D-score. Good luck to Cody Ceci!
They still didnt finish 1st in pacific last year so its a moot point. I think defensive depth is crucial in the regular season
here is the splits 5on5 over last 2 years for nurse and ceci. feel free to keep talking about how much of a loss he is
Hmmm. Interesting, yeah it does look like Ceci made Nurse worse.
this year at 5on5:Well that's because those two have almost exclusively played together the last two years, and when they were apart Ceci played with Kulak most commonly, and Nurse played with Bouchard. So unless the Oilers plan on splitting their top pairing, I wouldn't expect Nurses numbers to drastically change for the better as the post above would suggest.