Wallet Inspector
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 6,274
- 5,812
And they did add stability, by subtracting Ceci.We all know they wanted to get rid of Ceci, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Again, I didn't say that Ceci was good, I said the Oilers needed to add stability and they added more question marks instead. The question is, did the Oilers improve on defence? I have a hard time believing the answer is yes, even though Ceci was bad.
We all know they wanted to get rid of Ceci, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Again, I didn't say that Ceci was good, I said the Oilers needed to add stability and they added more question marks instead. The question is, did the Oilers improve on defence? I have a hard time believing the answer is yes, even though Ceci was bad.
here is the splits 5on5 over last 2 years for nurse and ceci. feel free to keep talking about how much of a loss he isYeah, you're sort of overlooking the key factor here, which is that Ceci was usually partnered with Nurse. Has he been partnered with Ekholm, those numbers would be 10 points higher.
You'll note that every Oilers' D whom they tried with Nurse suddenly looked worse with Nurse.
Ceci is a good NHL defenceman and did a great job with Edmonton. He's going to have some long nights with San Jose next year, but he'll also help settle that D-score. Good luck to Cody Ceci!
They still didnt finish 1st in pacific last year so its a moot point. I think defensive depth is crucial in the regular season
here is the splits 5on5 over last 2 years for nurse and ceci. feel free to keep talking about how much of a loss he is
Hmmm. Interesting, yeah it does look like Ceci made Nurse worse.
this year at 5on5:Well that's because those two have almost exclusively played together the last two years, and when they were apart Ceci played with Kulak most commonly, and Nurse played with Bouchard. So unless the Oilers plan on splitting their top pairing, I wouldn't expect Nurses numbers to drastically change for the better as the post above would suggest.
Lost their 1 d man for the seasonEdmonton
La
Vegas
Vancouver
Seatle
Calgary
Anaheim
San Jose
LA is wildly underrated. One of the best analytical teams the last 2 years and got rid of their locker room cancer
Vegas needs to find some contributors up front, I'm sure they will but it'll probably be a bit of a process. You'd think they're bound to have a healthier season though. Seems like they've had injuries in the regular season for multiple years now.
There’s something very soothing about that rotating catThere has been a standings thread for Atlantic but nothing else. So here is the pacific thread. Just like the title says, what is your prediction for the Pacific?
With the Doughty injury this is very likely how it shakes out. IMO only the top three will be on the playoffs though. Both wildcards come for the central.Edmonton
Vancouver
Las Vegas
Seattle
LA
SJ
Anaheim
Calgary
I’m a little worried about Vancouver now with the goalie issues compared to when I made that post but I think they are still a playoff team.With the Doughty injury this is very likely how it shakes out. IMO only the top three will be on the playoffs though. Both wildcards come for the central.
Want to bet now that LA will finish 2nd without Dough boy?Edmonton
La
Vegas
Vancouver
Seatle
Calgary
Anaheim
San Jose
LA is wildly underrated. One of the best analytical teams the last 2 years and got rid of their locker room cancer
Am not that worried based on what Demko said and Canucks signing Lankinen and how Silovs has played so far in preseason. In fact my concern will be more about getting another top 4 D. They will be fine in both fprward position and goaltending. Maybe they can use Demko's cap hit to gain more cap spaceI’m a little worried about Vancouver now with the goalie issues compared to when I made that post but I think they are still a playoff team.
You know there is a date and time of my post where you can see that it was posted before the injury to their best dman right? Hope this helps you with more intelligent posts moving forwardWant to bet now that LA will finish 2nd without Dough boy?