The Faulker 27
Registered User
I'm just thankful Ward didn't get scored on a several times. We need him to be confident during the winnable games.
Yep. 1 million per in salary, and cap hit of 750K then 1M
We can EASILY find a better backup and buy him out for less then the cost of his contract next season.
the capitals are good at hockey but we are very bad at it
not trying to be controversial just saying
I don't think Teravainen benefited from being a healthy scratch last month. in fact, it seemed to weaken his confidence and he's become more tentative.
i hope he gets through that real quick
Based on that interview he did, it didn't sound like he took it very well. Something could have been lost in translation, but he sounded kinda pissed that he got sat for making a mistake or two (which I kind of agree, unless it was something they had been telling him for a while that finally materially influenced the game).
I don't disagree. His response screamed "soft" to me.
Yeah, I don't give a ****. Sometimes you're gonna get scratched, big boy. Man the **** up. If one scratch is the difference between "good" TT and "bad" TT, then I submit to you that there isn't actually a "good" TT to be had in the end.
A lot of people don't respond well to punishment, and respond better to support and encouragement. I get that in the macho world of sports the attitude is that everyone should just toughen up, but when you're screaming at or benching a guy who doesn't respond to that, you're not just hurting his performance, you're hurting the team. Knowing which players respond best to what is part of what makes an effective coach. If your response to a player who doesn't respond well to a "tough" style of coaching is to get tougher, and the player stops playing well out of fear, congratulations, you're wasting serious talent that could instead be helping the team so that you can feel manly.
If you want to win hockey games, you have to recognize that different players are going to respond differently to different treatment, and you need to take the tack that's going to have each performing at their best, and sometimes that means that you check your anger and offer the carrot instead. It's hard to do, nobody does it perfectly, but Peters may have miscalculated here.
play football manager and you will understand that quickly because all those primadonna digital soccermans have the most arbitrary feels i have ever seen
A lot of people don't respond well to punishment, and respond better to support and encouragement. I get that in the macho world of sports the attitude is that everyone should just toughen up, but when you're screaming at or benching a guy who doesn't respond to that, you're not just hurting his performance, you're hurting the team. Knowing which players respond best to what is part of what makes an effective coach. If your response to a player who doesn't respond well to a "tough" style of coaching is to get tougher, and the player stops playing well out of fear, congratulations, you're wasting serious talent that could instead be helping the team so that you can feel manly.
If you want to win hockey games, you have to recognize that different players are going to respond differently to different treatment, and you need to take the tack that's going to have each performing at their best, and sometimes that means that you check your anger and offer the carrot instead. It's hard to do, nobody does it perfectly, but Peters may have miscalculated here.
It strikes me that one of the things that makes Peters effective is that when he preaches accountability, he actually means it.