Potential Atlanta NHL Expansion Team Thread

AtlantaWhaler

Thrash/Preds/Sabres
Jul 3, 2009
20,208
3,447
Good for Atlanta.

I can see Atlanta being one of two teams to be granted NHL expansion franchise, whenever the NHL gets around to doing so, along with Houston or Salt Lake City. With the right ownership group, NHL hockey could be a resounding success.

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the Thrashers start to become irrelevant, once the ASG purchased them. If Ted Turner had not merged his companies with AOL, the Thrashers could have been as sucessful as any other team. If hockey can work in Nashville and Carolina, I see no reason that a team cannot succeed in the area.
Yeah, you're right. Pre-Spirit, attendance generally hovered around 15-16K despite terrible play. Think it peaked around 16 or 17K the "playoff year". When A$G bought the team and outwardly proclaimed they didn't want the hockey just the basketball and arena, the attendance dropped an average of 1K each year over a 5 or 6-year period.
Wouldn’t it be something if Winnipeg relocated back to Atlanta? Financially, the Jets are in trouble up there in Winnipeg. It’s just not a major league market.
I just don't see any way the ownership, who is flush with cash, would let that happen on their watch.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,795
15,468
Yeah, you're right. Pre-Spirit, attendance generally hovered around 15-16K despite terrible play. Think it peaked around 16 or 17K the "playoff year". When A$G bought the team and outwardly proclaimed they didn't want the hockey just the basketball and arena, the attendance dropped an average of 1K each year over a 5 or 6-year period.

I just don't see any way the ownership, who is flush with cash, would let that happen on their watch.
Wouldn’t the Coyotes be most likely if a club relocated to Georgia?
 

AtlantaWhaler

Thrash/Preds/Sabres
Jul 3, 2009
20,208
3,447
Wouldn’t the Coyotes be most likely if a club relocated to Georgia?
While the Yotes appear to desperately need a home, they keep finding a way.... going on 12 years plus.

Also, IF the Yotes were to move, last I read was that SLC was the front runner to get a relo/expansion team based on the biggest need for any team...willing ownership with $$.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,795
15,468
While the Yotes appear to desperately need a home, they keep finding a way.... going on 12 years plus.

Also, IF the Yotes were to move, last I read was that SLC was the front runner to get a relo/expansion team based on the biggest need for any team...willing ownership with $$.
It just seems the completion date matches with the expiring Coyote lease at Mullet. Plus, isn’t the newly hired project manager associated with Mullet and the Coyotes? Just appears stuff is lining up for the relocation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AtlantaWhaler

AtlantaWhaler

Thrash/Preds/Sabres
Jul 3, 2009
20,208
3,447
It just seems the completion date matches with the expiring Coyote lease at Mullet. Plus, isn’t the newly hired project manager associated with Mullet and the Coyotes? Just appears stuff is lining up for the relocation.
Yeah, it's an interesting move to bring in the ASU manager, but until a true owner steps forward, I will hold off on any excitement on a potential Atlanta team.
 

GreenHornet

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
617
470
Norcross, GA
As The Gathering F/B page puts it: "Keep up-to-date on our website ..." :boredom:
Appropriate emoji you use, since the latest update was in May. 🤣
Wouldn’t the Coyotes be most likely if a club relocated to Georgia?
I doubt it, based on Atlanta Whalers post (or repost of the NHL to Atlanta tweet). That says that groundbreaking for the new arena isn’t expected for another year, with a hopeful completion date by fall of 2026. Given that the Atlanta Gladiators of the ECHL just announced a four-year lease extension to play at Gas South Arena yesterday, there’s really no place for any potential relocation team to play until the Gathering is completed.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AtlantaWhaler

hangman005

It's my first day.
Apr 19, 2015
28,661
43,127
Iceland II the hotter crappier version.
Appropriate emoji you use, since the latest update was in May. 🤣

I doubt it, based on Atlanta Whalers post (or repost of the NHL to Atlanta tweet). That says that groundbreaking for the new arena isn’t expected for another year, with a hopeful completion date by fall of 2026. Given that the Atlanta Gladiators of the ECHL just announced a four-year lease extension to play at Gas South Arena yesterday, there’s really no place for any potential relocation team to play until the Gathering is completed.

And then it's just a matter of hoping the yotes don't hire Carmen San Diego before then.

But on a seriously note, I would absolutely love to see a successful Phoenix and Atlanta team in the NHL.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,795
15,468
Appropriate emoji you use, since the latest update was in May. 🤣

I doubt it, based on Atlanta Whalers post (or repost of the NHL to Atlanta tweet). That says that groundbreaking for the new arena isn’t expected for another year, with a hopeful completion date by fall of 2026. Given that the Atlanta Gladiators of the ECHL just announced a four-year lease extension to play at Gas South Arena yesterday, there’s really no place for any potential relocation team to play until the Gathering is completed.

Isn’t the Coyotes lease on Mullet up Fall 2026? Just seems the one rink is ready as the Coyotes need a home.
 

GreenHornet

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
617
470
Norcross, GA
Isn’t the Coyotes lease on Mullet up Fall 2026? Just seems the one rink is ready as the Coyotes need a home.
You may be right, but I think either work will have already begun on a new rink in the desert or the 'Yotes will move elsewhere before that lease runs out. I just don't see it dragging out until the end of the lease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

Gabe Kupari

Registered User
Jul 11, 2013
15,269
14,861
Winter is Coming
Isn’t the Coyotes lease on Mullet up Fall 2026? Just seems the one rink is ready as the Coyotes need a home.

SLC is ready now. Keeps the east west balance. Then you expand to eastern city ATL and West team Houston but Atlanta needs an owner and probably the Atlanta hawks to agree to play there also cuz I mean nobody building a 1 billion $ rink for 41 nights a year. Seems like a pipe dream honestly regardless of who they hired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KevFu and Fatass

AtlantaWhaler

Thrash/Preds/Sabres
Jul 3, 2009
20,208
3,447
SLC is ready now. Keeps the east west balance. Then you expand to eastern city ATL and West team Houston but Atlanta needs an owner and probably the Atlanta hawks to agree to play there also cuz I mean nobody building a 1 billion $ rink for 41 nights a year. Seems like a pipe dream honestly regardless of who they hired.
Honestly, every time I see relocation/expansion discussed, this comes up. I really don't think alignment makes that much of a difference.

In the end, if there is an owner willing to pay whatever is asked, with an arena ready, it doesn't matter if the west or east has an extra team or not.
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,326
11,122
Charlotte, NC
Honestly, every time I see relocation/expansion discussed, this comes up. I really don't think alignment makes that much of a difference.

In the end, if there is an owner willing to pay whatever is asked, with an arena ready, it doesn't matter if the west or east has an extra team or not.

They certainly made a big deal about alignment before. Not sure what would have changed.
 

AtlantaWhaler

Thrash/Preds/Sabres
Jul 3, 2009
20,208
3,447
They certainly made a big deal about alignment before. Not sure what would have changed.
It's certainly a consideration, especially with expansion. But overall, money talks. If threre happens to be money that makes alignment work out, bonus...but if some rich bastard is willing to pay those crazy expansion fees or can pay and support a team that needs to move...they'll make it work
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
192,885
43,433
I really don’t think expansion vs. relocation will be an issue because the league will gladly dissolve a team if they’re getting $1B+ to expand.
 

sh724

Registered User
Jun 2, 2009
2,829
619
Missouri
I really don’t think expansion vs. relocation will be an issue because the league will gladly dissolve a team if they’re getting $1B+ to expand.

People on here like to throw around the idea of dissolving a team but its really not that simple. The owners aren't willingly going to give up their asset either and will want paid for it at fair market value. Even if you take the least valuable team in the league that is still $500MM+ that would have to paid out just to the owner. Player contracts would have to be bought out. Arena contracts have to be bought out. Staff contracts are going to have to be bought out. TV contracts have to be bought out. Sponsor contracts have to be bought out. Then there is most definitely going to be lawsuits that pop up as well.

It would likely cost $1B+ just to get rid of a team in the modern era, so no the league would not gladly dissolve a team just to break even at best.

The only way a team, in any league (minus MLS), could realistically be dissolved is if the owner willingly gives up the charter and doesnt want to be fairly compensated
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
192,885
43,433
People on here like to throw around the idea of dissolving a team but its really not that simple. The owners aren't willingly going to give up their asset either and will want paid for it at fair market value. Even if you take the least valuable team in the league that is still $500MM+ that would have to paid out just to the owner. Player contracts would have to be bought out. Arena contracts have to be bought out. Staff contracts are going to have to be bought out. TV contracts have to be bought out. Sponsor contracts have to be bought out. Then there is most definitely going to be lawsuits that pop up as well.

It would likely cost $1B+ just to get rid of a team in the modern era, so no the league would not gladly dissolve a team just to break even at best.

The only way a team, in any league (minus MLS), could realistically be dissolved is if the owner willingly gives up the charter and doesnt want to be fairly compensated
The outgoing owner would definitely be made whole.
 

Fish on The Sand

Untouchable
Feb 28, 2002
60,359
2,129
Canada
People on here like to throw around the idea of dissolving a team but its really not that simple. The owners aren't willingly going to give up their asset either and will want paid for it at fair market value. Even if you take the least valuable team in the league that is still $500MM+ that would have to paid out just to the owner. Player contracts would have to be bought out. Arena contracts have to be bought out. Staff contracts are going to have to be bought out. TV contracts have to be bought out. Sponsor contracts have to be bought out. Then there is most definitely going to be lawsuits that pop up as well.

It would likely cost $1B+ just to get rid of a team in the modern era, so no the league would not gladly dissolve a team just to break even at best.

The only way a team, in any league (minus MLS), could realistically be dissolved is if the owner willingly gives up the charter and doesnt want to be fairly compensated
The biggest thing would be quite simply that the NHLPA would shut that down, just like the MLBPA shut down the Expos/Twins contraction plan.
 

tucker3434

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 7, 2007
20,292
11,351
Atlanta, GA
SLC is ready now. Keeps the east west balance. Then you expand to eastern city ATL and West team Houston but Atlanta needs an owner and probably the Atlanta hawks to agree to play there also cuz I mean nobody building a 1 billion $ rink for 41 nights a year. Seems like a pipe dream honestly regardless of who they hired.

This is Atlanta. Building unnecessary sports venues is kind of our thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKJ

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad