Post Training Camp Roster Discussion

i've been on the sidelines for months waiting. i only saw the NYR game in Vegas so i am only up to speed based on others comments, opinions and insights. here is my beginning of the season take on the state of the Kings.

the glut of 3/4 line veteran talent vs. the Kids:
Carbomb, Fraser, Lewis, Frattin, King are all UFA/RFA after this season. i think all of them are on a tryout at this point. that is what this year's camp was about. the chance for Dean to measure the Kids against these guys. it will not surprise me if any of them struggle that Sutter will sit them first. any extended lack of production or effort and they are gone. none of them can afford to have a season like they did last year.

the exception to this is Lewis. i agree with MN14 - he is a Maltby type of player. he does everything to help a team win, but seldom appears on the sheet except for hits, blocked shots, etc. every team needs one or two guys like this to win titles.

Clifford i didn't mention. he has another year to go on his contract, but this year is critical for him. last year he was invisible in my eyes, he has to make his presence known. i'm not saying he has to drop the mitts all the time, but he has to play physical.

Nolan the one game i saw, i liked what i saw. he was destroying guys and best of all, he walked away most of the time from the after whistle crap. you want to make a player/team lose their ****, that is how you do it. play them physical and when they go to retaliate just skate away.

King, Fraser and Carcillo imo are gone. they are holding back more well rounded young talent on ELCs. i expect 1-2 of them traded by the deadline to make room.

D corp
stacked. pure and simple. is it ideal? no. i would rather have Scuds over RR, but it isn't happening so move on. i am anxious to see how RR performs now that he is 100%. i am still concerned about his top end speed and even more on his lateral/pivot movement. i think he got burned more on stop/starts then he did at top speed.

DD and VV....no reason to comment. studs that will carry the backend all 200 feet.

AMart i am glad to hear is coming back in 2012 form. the guy never got it together last year with the two injuries, coupled with a compressed schedule. i still have very high hopes for him moving forward.

Muzz has tremendous upside as we all know. once he overcomes his injury, we will see him split with AMart. to me Muzz is rough, he needs time to develop between the ears to be more effective on the ice. he needs to simplify and slow down his game. last year i think he tried to do to much and accelerate his own development. that lead to some porr decisions and miscues. KISS.....keep it simple stupid. he plays north-south and plays his game he will be fine.

Sutter - AMart - Muzz. personally i think if Sutter is smart he lays out 10 game plans for these two, that let's them know when they play. i think both guys last year where so worried about their play and possibly getting scratched it **** them up more and performed poorly on the ice. Sutter needs to reduce the fear factor these two have, so they go out and play 'their' game. in the end the team will be better for it.

WM - hope the knee holds brother. if it does he is an upgrade to Scuds.
MG - love Greener. who is the first jagoff this season that will call for his trade? whoever it is most likely never played and don't realize why a team needs a guy like him.

Goalies

Quick - enough said

Scrivens - go buy yourself an ass donut, so you don't get a sore ass or 'roids.

Top 6
The big guys can't go silent or slump....end of story.

As some noted the lineup on Oct 3 most likely will not be what we see come April and past, not to mention next season.

At what point will we possibly see the evolution of the Kings forward lines? Personally i think we will begin to see it when they guys on the 3/4 lines aren't producing they way DL wants. It goes back to camp. Dean got a good long look (and Sutter finally) at what they had in vets and prospects. They both now see what they have as replacement upgrades, should they want to change the dynamic of the team. The same way they did in 2012.

I have been and am still in support of a lineup that is going to be
xx - Kopitar - xx
xx - Carter - xx
xx - Richards - xx
xx - Stoll - xx

That is and will be the Kings lineup period. It gives Dean the ability to move around all the pieces he has and slot them in correctly, while improving the club on the top end. Nobody is playing out of position just to get in the lineup. It moves guys into a position based around their age/capability that will allow them to play more to their abilities.

Going to this lineup will move Stoll down into the #4, which will be a pre-tell of AA's arrival to take that role.

Pearson - TT can move into the line up on any of the top three lines, on the correct side.

Brown can slide from 1-3 in the line up as the LW, but i think sliding him down and a reduction in TOI will help him long term for his career.

JW can stay with Kopi, or slide him alongside Carter or Richards. I want to see JW play with Richards on the #3. Personally i would hate to play against a line that was made up of xx - Richards - Williams. Yes there is skill there, but more importantly the amount of veteran know how and grit is over the top. As a 3rd line having those two out there, would exploit the living hell out almost every team they line up against. Put a kid on the left side with some size/speed to open space and it will be entertaining.

WC - Pacific - SCF
who the hell knows? i've seen far to many wide ranging calls on where LA will finish. Some as far down as 3rd or 4th in the Pacifc. Really? Hockey experts my ass.

Write it down, quote me on it. The WCF will be almost exclusively a CHI - LA series for the next 5 years. Those are the two teams to beat in the west as it stands today. Both teams have all the pieces in place today and have strong pipelines of prospects waiting.

Outside of the Kings and Hawks, then i see STL and ANH. STL is the only team other than CHI that worries me in the West. ANH is becoming more and more a two horse act of Baldy and Perry. SJ is at a seesaw tipping point when you look at the roster of young vs vets. Joe, Marleau and Boyle lead that team and that is a lot of talent to lose when they leave/retire. VAN....lol....Torts....lmao....he will implode in VAN and the sisters will retire back to Sweden. In the end the Nucks will still be titleless. MIN still building, has some pieces but needs time to develop further.

Back to the Hawks....
The achilles of the Hawks past, present and remains the #2C spot. Zus did great for them and I was happy for him. The guy is a class act and i was happy to see him get a ring. Now it is a full season, he is another year older at 36. How effective will he be in the middle of March? May?

After Zus then it becomes another rotation of Kane? Sharp? experiment at center, which only reduces the effectiveness of what makes them. Zus gave coach Q the ability to stack one of them on a top line. To essentially skate three all star forwards together - Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa. If Zus becomes ineffective then Q has to move him down to the #3C. Which turns into another D Bolland situation that never worked for them, when they try moving Shaw or Kruger up.

On the back end it will be Rozsival and/or Leddy. Which will break first? Rozsival is 35 and just had a career year, one that had Q leaning heavily on him. Can he continue to give them 20+ minutes for a full season.

Leddy is at a critical junction. He is CHI's Alec Martinez. Great skill set, great potential but struggling to pull it together every night.

Those are the three guys in CHI's roster that i think are key to their success this year. Some will say what about Crawford? Personally i think he will play like he did last season. He's a damn good goalie and like Quick (pre 2012) doesn't get the respect he should. Now if he should get injured and they have to rely on Khabi, that is another question.

these are my assessments at this point. can't wait for the puck to drop. i love summer and hate winter. but i hate no hockey during the summer....it's a strange love-hate

GKG!!
 
My concern is not the bottom six, it's the top six (minus JDub) falling off the earth like they did last year's playoff's...

NOt a complete drop off, Carter and Richards were for the most part very good and producing against 2 good teams and hard matchups. Agree on Brown and Kopi for most of the first 2 rounds (Brown's injury occuring game 6 vs San Jose) But that's not likely to happen this year.

A 60% drop in production folks(Brown/Kopitar, along with Doughty having his worst playoff series EVER (in his career).

Doughty got injured early in the Blues series. Physical series, brusing hits on every shift, injuries happen. And the Hawks will find that out next year if they get to the 2nd round where they'll have to most likely go thru St Louis to get bck tothe WCF.

That is why the Kings lost to the Hawks, not the bottom six.

The bottom 6 includes the 3rd line, which didn't produce and that was directly responsible for goals not going in, so that is a contributing factor, a large one, in why the Kings didn't have an easier time in the first 2 rounds and why they lost in the 3rd. Once Richards got injured in game 1 and lost 3 games, the series was over. It's hockey, injuries and a part of the luck factor in a long drive. The year before the Kings didn't have as many key players hurt and it showed.
 
i've been on the sidelines for months waiting. i only saw the NYR game in Vegas so i am only up to speed based on others comments, opinions and insights. here is my beginning of the season take on the state of the Kings.

the glut of 3/4 line veteran talent vs. the Kids:
Carbomb, Fraser, Lewis, Frattin, King are all UFA/RFA after this season. i think all of them are on a tryout at this point. that is what this year's camp was about. the chance for Dean to measure the Kids against these guys. it will not surprise me if any of them struggle that Sutter will sit them first. any extended lack of production or effort and they are gone. none of them can afford to have a season like they did last year.

the exception to this is Lewis. i agree with MN14 - he is a Maltby type of player. he does everything to help a team win, but seldom appears on the sheet except for hits, blocked shots, etc. every team needs one or two guys like this to win titles.

Clifford i didn't mention. he has another year to go on his contract, but this year is critical for him. last year he was invisible in my eyes, he has to make his presence known. i'm not saying he has to drop the mitts all the time, but he has to play physical.

Nolan the one game i saw, i liked what i saw. he was destroying guys and best of all, he walked away most of the time from the after whistle crap. you want to make a player/team lose their ****, that is how you do it. play them physical and when they go to retaliate just skate away.

King, Fraser and Carcillo imo are gone. they are holding back more well rounded young talent on ELCs. i expect 1-2 of them traded by the deadline to make room.

D corp
stacked. pure and simple. is it ideal? no. i would rather have Scuds over RR, but it isn't happening so move on. i am anxious to see how RR performs now that he is 100%. i am still concerned about his top end speed and even more on his lateral/pivot movement. i think he got burned more on stop/starts then he did at top speed.

DD and VV....no reason to comment. studs that will carry the backend all 200 feet.

AMart i am glad to hear is coming back in 2012 form. the guy never got it together last year with the two injuries, coupled with a compressed schedule. i still have very high hopes for him moving forward.

Muzz has tremendous upside as we all know. once he overcomes his injury, we will see him split with AMart. to me Muzz is rough, he needs time to develop between the ears to be more effective on the ice. he needs to simplify and slow down his game. last year i think he tried to do to much and accelerate his own development. that lead to some porr decisions and miscues. KISS.....keep it simple stupid. he plays north-south and plays his game he will be fine.

Sutter - AMart - Muzz. personally i think if Sutter is smart he lays out 10 game plans for these two, that let's them know when they play. i think both guys last year where so worried about their play and possibly getting scratched it **** them up more and performed poorly on the ice. Sutter needs to reduce the fear factor these two have, so they go out and play 'their' game. in the end the team will be better for it.

WM - hope the knee holds brother. if it does he is an upgrade to Scuds.
MG - love Greener. who is the first jagoff this season that will call for his trade? whoever it is most likely never played and don't realize why a team needs a guy like him.

Goalies

Quick - enough said

Scrivens - go buy yourself an ass donut, so you don't get a sore ass or 'roids.

Top 6
The big guys can't go silent or slump....end of story.

As some noted the lineup on Oct 3 most likely will not be what we see come April and past, not to mention next season.

At what point will we possibly see the evolution of the Kings forward lines? Personally i think we will begin to see it when they guys on the 3/4 lines aren't producing they way DL wants. It goes back to camp. Dean got a good long look (and Sutter finally) at what they had in vets and prospects. They both now see what they have as replacement upgrades, should they want to change the dynamic of the team. The same way they did in 2012.

I have been and am still in support of a lineup that is going to be
xx - Kopitar - xx
xx - Carter - xx
xx - Richards - xx
xx - Stoll - xx

That is and will be the Kings lineup period. It gives Dean the ability to move around all the pieces he has and slot them in correctly, while improving the club on the top end. Nobody is playing out of position just to get in the lineup. It moves guys into a position based around their age/capability that will allow them to play more to their abilities.

Going to this lineup will move Stoll down into the #4, which will be a pre-tell of AA's arrival to take that role.

Pearson - TT can move into the line up on any of the top three lines, on the correct side.

Brown can slide from 1-3 in the line up as the LW, but i think sliding him down and a reduction in TOI will help him long term for his career.

JW can stay with Kopi, or slide him alongside Carter or Richards. I want to see JW play with Richards on the #3. Personally i would hate to play against a line that was made up of xx - Richards - Williams. Yes there is skill there, but more importantly the amount of veteran know how and grit is over the top. As a 3rd line having those two out there, would exploit the living hell out almost every team they line up against. Put a kid on the left side with some size/speed to open space and it will be entertaining.

WC - Pacific - SCF
who the hell knows? i've seen far to many wide ranging calls on where LA will finish. Some as far down as 3rd or 4th in the Pacifc. Really? Hockey experts my ass.

Write it down, quote me on it. The WCF will be almost exclusively a CHI - LA series for the next 5 years. Those are the two teams to beat in the west as it stands today. Both teams have all the pieces in place today and have strong pipelines of prospects waiting.

Outside of the Kings and Hawks, then i see STL and ANH. STL is the only team other than CHI that worries me in the West. ANH is becoming more and more a two horse act of Baldy and Perry. SJ is at a seesaw tipping point when you look at the roster of young vs vets. Joe, Marleau and Boyle lead that team and that is a lot of talent to lose when they leave/retire. VAN....lol....Torts....lmao....he will implode in VAN and the sisters will retire back to Sweden. In the end the Nucks will still be titleless. MIN still building, has some pieces but needs time to develop further.

Back to the Hawks....
The achilles of the Hawks past, present and remains the #2C spot. Zus did great for them and I was happy for him. The guy is a class act and i was happy to see him get a ring. Now it is a full season, he is another year older at 36. How effective will he be in the middle of March? May?

After Zus then it becomes another rotation of Kane? Sharp? experiment at center, which only reduces the effectiveness of what makes them. Zus gave coach Q the ability to stack one of them on a top line. To essentially skate three all star forwards together - Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa. If Zus becomes ineffective then Q has to move him down to the #3C. Which turns into another D Bolland situation that never worked for them, when they try moving Shaw or Kruger up.

On the back end it will be Rozsival and/or Leddy. Which will break first? Rozsival is 35 and just had a career year, one that had Q leaning heavily on him. Can he continue to give them 20+ minutes for a full season.

Leddy is at a critical junction. He is CHI's Alec Martinez. Great skill set, great potential but struggling to pull it together every night.

Those are the three guys in CHI's roster that i think are key to their success this year. Some will say what about Crawford? Personally i think he will play like he did last season. He's a damn good goalie and like Quick (pre 2012) doesn't get the respect he should. Now if he should get injured and they have to rely on Khabi, that is another question.

these are my assessments at this point. can't wait for the puck to drop. i love summer and hate winter. but i hate no hockey during the summer....it's a strange love-hate

GKG!!

TG, is this you? :sarcasm:
 
I have been and am still in support of a lineup that is going to be
xx - Kopitar - xx
xx - Carter - xx
xx - Richards - xx
xx - Stoll - xx

I think that works, as long as the top end talent doesn't get spread too thin throughout the lines, something possibly to the accord of:

Brown - Kopitar - Toffoli
Frattin - Carter - Williams
Pearson - Richards - Nolan
Clifford - Stoll - Lewis
 
We're STILL trying to talk Richards as 3rd line center? Jesus. Give it a rest.
 
We're STILL trying to talk Richards as 3rd line center? Jesus. Give it a rest.

don't fight it, it will happen in some kind of format. the sooner the better, since it means LA is finally rolling three (if not 4) lines with tremendous talent.

they no longer would be chained down to the run of the mill 2 scoring lines, a strong D shutdown line and the always favorite 'energy' line.

they will come at every team, on every shift. it spreads out all the talent and makes it impossible to match lines for the opponent.

whether the C's are Kopitar, Carter, Richards (1-3) or something else - that is the course that Dean is building to. perhaps with the emergence of AA, Vey it means that Richards won't slide down. only time will tell.

if it means that DL & DS are able to now slide kids like Pearson, TT, hell even Kozun into their natural positions and this gives them greater flexibility than they have currently.

don't forget there will another group of forwards coming after them in Mersch, Kitsyn, Weal, Fasching down the line. they need centermen to pivot all of them.
 
For those thinking King will be gone soon, Sutter said he was one of the best players in camp. He's not going anywhere anytime soon, at least if the coach has any say.
 
For those thinking King will be gone soon, Sutter said he was one of the best players in camp. He's not going anywhere anytime soon, at least if the coach has any say.

Honestly, I think King is a bit underrated around here. Yes, he took a bit of a step back last year. Let's not forget that he was one of the *key* players in our Stanley Cup run year. He had some very timely goals and really threw his body around. If he can get back to that level of play (and I believe he can), he will prove his worth. I think most people would even take King over Penner.
 
Honestly, I think King is a bit underrated around here. Yes, he took a bit of a step back last year. Let's not forget that he was one of the *key* players in our Stanley Cup run year. He had some very timely goals and really threw his body around. If he can get back to that level of play (and I believe he can), he will prove his worth. I think most people would even take King over Penner.

While I certainly don't think King is a legit top six option at forward, I do see value in a big forward who can contribute offensively in spurts. It sure beats having dead weight like Kyle Calder, Scott Thornton, Brian Willsie, etc. I think some people have unreasonable expectations from certain players.
 
We're STILL trying to talk Richards as 3rd line center? Jesus. Give it a rest.

Ah, see how crazy this Richards as a third liner talk is....I'm about to agree with CNS...

Find me a team in this league that competes for the Cup with 9 (+?) tied up in their 3rd/4th line centers??? The math just doesn't add up. (if you wanna go deeper, in the cap era you just can't afford to have 3 "scoring lines" logistics make it unrealistic). No chance, let alone breaking up the combo that lead for the best scoring seasons a Kings player has had in a long time.

Honestly, I think King is a bit underrated around here. Yes, he took a bit of a step back last year. Let's not forget that he was one of the *key* players in our Stanley Cup run year. He had some very timely goals and really threw his body around. If he can get back to that level of play (and I believe he can), he will prove his worth. I think most people would even take King over Penner.

Depends on what you mean by Key....If everyone was a key, then ok. If not he is like #12 or lower in my rank of "key" players on the cup run....
 
I'd say King was pretty instrumental in the defeat of the Blues and Coyotes. He stepped it up big and made the third checking line into a productive one.
 
I'd say King was pretty instrumental in the defeat of the Blues and Coyotes. He stepped it up big and made the third checking line into a productive one.

Was he more instrumental in the Cup run then.

1.DD
2.Kopi
3.Quick
4.Brown
5.Richards
6.Carter
7.VV
8.Mitchell
9.J-Dub
10.Skuds
11.Lewis
12.Amart
13.Greene
14.Penner

? I can see a case for maybe the last 3. Maybe.

(I should add, that I am more positive on King and Clifford then most on this board as well)
 
Last edited:
The math just doesn't add up. (if you wanna go deeper, in the cap era you just can't afford to have 3 "scoring lines" logistics make it unrealistic). No chance, let alone breaking up the combo that lead for the best scoring seasons a Kings player has had in a long time.
.

I understand your second point (don't necessarily agree with it), but the first point doesn't make sense. The Kings can afford it under the cap with the lines that were suggested. LA can infuse a lot more skill using the kids on ELC's and spread the offense around and making it harder for thinner teams to match up. It requires dumping a few players, mostly redundant bottom 3 types, but it's very doable.
 
Depends on what you mean by Key....If everyone was a key, then ok. If not he is like #12 or lower in my rank of "key" players on the cup run....

I would say anyone who played more than 4 games during the playoffs that year (read: Gagne) was key. Hell, even Brad Richardson scored a pivotal goal...
 
I understand your second point (don't necessarily agree with it), but the first point doesn't make sense. The Kings can afford it under the cap with the lines that were suggested. LA can infuse a lot more skill using the kids on ELC's and spread the offense around and making it harder for thinner teams to match up. It requires dumping a few players, mostly redundant bottom 3 types, but it's very doable.

Except Person/Vey/Toffoli all make like 200K more than King/Carcillo/Nolan. So really they can't.
 
have VV and DD played power play on the point together regularly before?

cause that 1st unit will have some serious potential!

I'm thinking Doughty and Muzzin on PP1, VV on PP2, maybe with AMart. More value that way, having two good units with shooters and PMDs.
 
don't fight it, it will happen in some kind of format. the sooner the better, since it means LA is finally rolling three (if not 4) lines with tremendous talent.

they no longer would be chained down to the run of the mill 2 scoring lines, a strong D shutdown line and the always favorite 'energy' line.

they will come at every team, on every shift. it spreads out all the talent and makes it impossible to match lines for the opponent.

whether the C's are Kopitar, Carter, Richards (1-3) or something else - that is the course that Dean is building to. perhaps with the emergence of AA, Vey it means that Richards won't slide down. only time will tell.

if it means that DL & DS are able to now slide kids like Pearson, TT, hell even Kozun into their natural positions and this gives them greater flexibility than they have currently.

don't forget there will another group of forwards coming after them in Mersch, Kitsyn, Weal, Fasching down the line. they need centermen to pivot all of them.

Don't forget VK!
 
Are you serious? He had 5 goals and 3 assists in 20 games, averaging just under 13 minutes a game. That is pretty damn productive if you ask me. I think most people forget how good he was that year. He clicked with Richards for some pretty nice goals during the season also.

Was he more instrumental in the Cup run then.

1.DD
2.Kopi
3.Quick
4.Brown
5.Richards
6.Carter
7.VV
8.Mitchell
9.J-Dub
10.Skuds
11.Lewis
12.Amart
13.Greene
14.Penner

? I can see a case for maybe the last 3. Maybe.

(I should add, that I am more positive on King and Clifford then most on this board as well)
 
I'd say King was pretty instrumental in the defeat of the Blues and Coyotes. He stepped it up big and made the third checking line into a productive one.

Fun fact- Dwight King is the Kings all time leading conference finals goal scorer!

BC_CHI_DwightFace.jpg
 
Was he more instrumental in the Cup run then.

1.DD
2.Kopi
3.Quick
4.Brown
5.Richards
6.Carter
7.VV
8.Mitchell
9.J-Dub
10.Skuds
11.Lewis
12.Amart
13.Greene
14.Penner

? I can see a case for maybe the last 3. Maybe.

(I should add, that I am more positive on King and Clifford then most on this board as well)

King in the 2012 playoffs was the guy that every Cup winning team has and ultimately needs. It's the forward the comes up with a few goals outside of your top 6. Your stars win you the Cup, but your depth allows you to play for it.

Your big name players aren't always going to score in the playoffs. Brown went a little silent in the Phoenix series, and the Kings needed King(or whoever) to get them an extra goal here and there. Was King as instrumental over the entire course of the 20 games they played as most of the players on the roster? Probably not. In the Phoenix series by itself? Hell yes, he turned out to be a pivotal player.
 
King in the 2012 playoffs was the guy that every Cup winning team has and ultimately needs. It's the forward the comes up with a few goals outside of your top 6. Your stars win you the Cup, but your depth allows you to play for it.

Your big name players aren't always going to score in the playoffs. Brown went a little silent in the Phoenix series, and the Kings needed King(or whoever) to get them an extra goal here and there. Was King as instrumental over the entire course of the 20 games they played as most of the players on the roster? Probably not. In the Phoenix series by itself? Hell yes, he turned out to be a pivotal player.

He was also huge in the St Louis series.

You nailed it in the bolded area. hockey is a team sport. Teams win championships. Everyone needs to step up and even Nolan scored in the cup run.
 
Dwight King was the 4th leading scorer among rookie LW's while playing 27 games in 11/12 and ends up being 4rth overall if you go into his next season up to 82gp.

He will never be an elite scoring forward in the NHL but the fact that he is 6'3" and 234lbs and that he is at the very least better then average when compared to his more highly touted peers I can't see any reason to debate King any further.

He is big and can contribute on offence and he plays LW. We can use him and hope that he continues to establish his game as we do. That's all.
 
That would be NHL superstar Colten Teubert.

Ahh, thanks Ziggy.

I'm not sure how much he was sat since in 2010-2011 he did play 59 games, but perhaps he was sat. I'll give that one to Puck U. An exception to every rule perhaps? Anyways, here's your free burger

new-aleinn-coupon.jpg


No 2 playoff runs are alike and what would or would not occur if (and a big if) the Hawks met the Kings in the WCF.
The Hawks are the champs and should be one of the top teams this year. However, some things have changes. Part of their success last year was
1) a shortened season, they won't just be playing WC teams this year, they'll ahve to play elite teams/tough teams from the East and

2) Emery provided excellent relief for Crawford and was in about 40% of their games. I don't know over a full season if KHabibulin can sustain that type of play.

3) Any possible trip to the WCF now (unlike last year) goes thru St Louis due to divisional play. The Blues are a physically punishing team and look what damage (and injuries) came out of the 1st round vs the Kings , who are bigger and stronger (more physical) than the Hawks. Kane hates physical contact and avoids confrontations when he can, what do you think he['ll look like after 6 or 7 games vs the Blues? If the Hawks and Blues do meet in round 2, there's a strong change St Louis gets past the Hawks. And even if they did, they'd be just as battered, bloodied, bruised and injured as the Kings were last year. That would make a diffrence.

4) The Kings has a much more difficult path to the WCF last year, than the Hawks did. They underperformed thru the 1st series and most of the 2nd and almost lost. ANd if the Kings had been fully healthy, including Mitchell , it might have turned out differently.

5) I don't like the make up of the Kings bottom 6 either but agree with TG on this one. I don't think the 3r d and 4th lines will be the same come playoff time or before. If that 3rd line doesn't produce, Sutter knows that there are bodies , hungry and eager, that can. They need more from that 3rd line and maybe they will come thru, but if they don't, they'll make the changes necesary, including a trade.

Good points. One I think you missed though is Bolland being traded. I think he will be very hard for them to replace and make for a much easier matchup against his line. He was expensive and as such had to go, but he was very good at a lot of things.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad