Good Intentions
Registered User
- Mar 30, 2018
- 2,157
- 1,940
But I thought Gorton and crew were terrible??????Think how bad it was. All these guys are last two years trades and draft
Chytil
Kravtsov
Shestyorkin
Andersson
Hajek
Howden
Miller
Rykov
Lindgren
Lundkvist
But I thought Gorton and crew were terrible??????
Lol
Nice. I would still say Chytil has more of the potential side...Along with Miller probably the Highest potential. Looking forward to seeing larger sample size of Kravtsov next year.1.Shesty
2. Lias
3. Milller
In regard to potential + chance of sticking.
Not sure if this is sarcasm or notThat Lias shot release tho...
I agree with Lundkvist over Lindgren, but I have Miller over Rykov ever so slightly.That’s probably my exact list except I have Rykov over Miller and Lundqkvist over Lindgren (who I really like still)
Did I say he was as good as Barzal? I said if Kravstov HITS on his upside, he can absolutely be a star player.Right now Kratsov and Barzal dont belong in the same paragraph
Kravtsov has the potential to be that type of player. Scouting reports on him say he has game breaking potential.We still don’t have a clear cut star prospect which is our biggest need. I love Chytil but I’m not sure he’s that type of prospect. There’s no Keller or Barzal in that group. There’s no sergachev or McAvoy.
We’ve still got a lot of work to do.
And Barzal when he was drafted doesn't belong in the same paragraph as Barzal now. It'd be extremely lucky if Kratsov ever became as good, but let's not pretend Barzal was drafted as someone with the expectation of putting up 85 points as a rookie.
Kravstov absolutely has that upside if he hits.We still don’t have a clear cut star prospect which is our biggest need. I love Chytil but I’m not sure he’s that type of prospect. There’s no Keller or Barzal in that group. There’s no sergachev or McAvoy.
We’ve still got a lot of work to do.
And Barzal when he was drafted doesn't belong in the same paragraph as Barzal now. It'd be extremely lucky if Kratsov ever became as good, but let's not pretend Barzal was drafted as someone with the expectation of putting up 85 points as a rookie.Right now Kratsov and Barzal dont belong in the same paragraph
I'd say a 50% chance to be a 50-60 point guyWhat do you think of Chytil?
Kravstov absolutely has that upside if he hits.
And Barzal when he was drafted doesn't belong in the same paragraph as Barzal now. It'd be extremely lucky if Kratsov ever became as good, but let's not pretend Barzal was drafted as someone with the expectation of putting up 85 points as a rookie.
You forgot Filip1.Shesty
2. Lias
3. Milller
In regard to potential + chance of sticking.
Shesty has had long stretches of absolute dominance playing against Men.
As much as I like Chytil, Andersson, and Kravtsov, none of these guys have shown that Elite, next level play consistently.
Shestyorkin is easily #1 for me. It’s not even close.
Chytil + Kravtsov may have the offensive upside over Andersson, but I wouldn’t sleep on Lias because of that. I think a good portion of people neglect him because of his lack of flash.
Lias has the highest IQ by far imo. And as much as people hate to hear about character and leadership, he’s oozing it.
Exciting times ahead for us.
He was never dropping... he was rising consistently month to month, and I'm betting the Rangers are banking on his stock continuing to rise greater than his relative peers - a guy that looking back at the draft should have gone Top 5In regard to Kravtsov, is it the contract that caused him to drop in rankings prior to the draft, or is there some other red flag?
He was never dropping... he was rising consistently month to month, and I'm betting the Rangers are banking on his stock continuing to rise greater than his relative peers - a guy that looking back at the draft should have gone Top 5
He was never dropping... he was rising consistently month to month, and I'm betting the Rangers are banking on his stock continuing to rise greater than his relative peers - a guy that looking back at the draft should have gone Top 5
You’re overrating the prospect pool. 5 of your top 7 were drafted in the last two drafts. Most teams would have “Top 10” prospect pools if they included draft picks from the last 2 drafts.Tier 1:
1- Filip Chytil (C)
2- Igor Shestyorkin (G)
3- Vitali Kravtsov (RW)
Tier 2:
4- Lias Andersson (C)
5- K'Andre Miller (D)
6- Brett Howden (C)
7- Nils Lundkvist (D)
Tier 3:
7- Libor Hajek (D)
8- Yegor Rykov (D)
9- Ryan Lindgren (D)
HM- Vinni Lettieri (C/W) / Tony DeAngelo (D)
Top-10 Prospect Pool in the NHL imo.
All have solid NHL floors if they don't reach their potiental. But I have no doubt 3-5 of these prospects will prove to become a pivotal to our core 2-3 years from now. Chytil and Kravtsov both can become seriously high end talented players.
Our defense core looks incredible. Our biggest weakness is wing depth, hopefully we can draft high skill wingers tomorrow, which would really solidify the Rangers as a Top-5 prospect pool.
Excited for tomorrow since a lot of highly touted prospects are available for our 39th pick that could've easily gone in the first round.
In regard to Kravtsov, is it the contract that caused him to drop in rankings prior to the draft, or is there some other red flag?
He was rising not dropping. A few months back he was projected to go in the 20s and then started climbing quickly.In regard to Kravtsov, is it the contract that caused him to drop in rankings prior to the draft, or is there some other red flag?