Poll: Will David Savard fetch a first at the TDL, especially if we retain 50%?

Will David Savard fetch a first at the TDL, especially if we retain 50%?

  • Yes

    Votes: 48 21.1%
  • No

    Votes: 180 78.9%

  • Total voters
    228
  • Poll closed .

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,220
20,481
Quebec City, Canada
If we retain 50% for this year and next and a cup contending team who need a bottom 3 d is not interested in paying a 1st for him then NHL GMS are dumb.

He is a good guy to have and would have helped our defense a lot when we had Petry, Subban and Markov. I was not a fan when we signed him cause we needed to replace Markov but a team with a strong top 3 who need experience and leadership to complete their defense would be stupid to not be interested at 1.75 for this year and next year. Totally 100% stupid.
 

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
39,688
21,864
Savard is a RD and RDs don't grow on trees. Zadorov value is irrelevant as a LD with a full cap hit.

This year draft is weak and ~25-32overall picks have low hit rates.

Voted yes.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,289
156,255
let's try for a defered 1st like we did with Florida and Calgary. Almost worked with Florida to get a lottery pick.
Do you think that 2nd contract year will be a hindrance to a trade if Hughes should insist on not retaining?

I would envisage a trade on the trading deadline of his final contract year, where retaining would not be a factor. The flip side is that Savard is not exactly overpaid so his AAV even for 2 years, is digestible.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,376
25,770
Do you think that 2nd contract year will be a hindrance to a trade if Hughes should insist on not retaining?

I would envisage a trade on the trading deadline of his final contract year, where retaining would not be a factor. The flip side is that Savard is not exactly overpaid so his AAV even for 2 years, is digestible.
I still see a higher probability we don't get offered a 1st for Savard, even with 50% retained. But I'm curious to see what the market has in store. To get a 1st a team has to target a player. We'll see though. Which RD's will be available, and which ones will go first, leaving other teams looking for other back up plans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77 and Don D

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,014
18,221
No chance in hell to get a first for Savard. Nothing against the guy but he was barely worth that a couple years ago and he put some hard milleage on his body.
i don’t know. If we retain 50% for this remaining year and next, that would put him at $1.75 million which is a pretty risk averse trade even if it doesn’t work out completely. If contenders are looking for a RHD that can fill into a top 4 role when they need, they may be still willing to pay the price of a late first just to have that kind of depth.
 

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,666
4,239
Montréal
Amazing that a silly poll like this is remaining undeleted and unclosed and my very serious poll about Matheson potentially out-producing Caufield got deleted almost immediately.

Shows the amount of credibility... :skeptic:
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

Redux91

I do Three bullets.
Sep 5, 2006
47,092
43,546
Kirkland, Montreal
I thought before the year started they'd 100% trade him at the deadline

But I'm not so sure anymore.. our D can be SO GREEN most nights, even with Guhle now struggling a bit recently..

I can totally see Hughes hanging onto him not only for Vet purposes but We legit just CANT afford to be that bare on RD without him right now, with kovasevic obviously a number 6 for life, Barron still learning the ropes , Lindstrom being just a seat filler and Mailloux no where close to NHL ready

Think we hang onto him one more year, but gone at next years deadline
 

Cournoyer12

Registered User
Mar 17, 2022
1,507
2,138
I don't think we get a single first round pick at the TDL for any of the players that will be traded. Monahan and Anderson were the only candidates but with the way they're playing this season I'm pretty damn sure no team will be stupid enough to do it.
If we did get a 1st rounder, improbable, we’d probably trade it away for some washed out big-rep plug any ways. Color me jaded!
 

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
21,135
15,274
I think you'd need to retain, but its not impossible.

I also think that the only way he's traded at the deadline is if he returns a 1st (or equivalent).
 

jrom

Registered User
Mar 28, 2022
2,105
4,612
I don't think we get a single first round pick at the TDL for any of the players that will be traded. Monahan and Anderson were the only candidates but with the way they're playing this season I'm pretty damn sure no team will be stupid enough to do it.

Hopefully someone hires Chiarelli or Hextall before the TDL :sarcasm:
 

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,270
4,803
Vancouver, BC
I don't think Savard will be traded this year but in general we will get first for a Monahan+ package at the very least or if we take one a bad contract in an Allen/Armia trade.

I would love to see KH make a move for a vet forward who fits the team for the next few years, Or a Dach/Newhook like deal with an NHL-ready young player. In the short term, it can help the players will get back to their usual seats (so as not to hurt development) and when some like Newhook and Pearson return, the team will have a momentary boost, which in turn will sell the vets we want to move at a higher price at the TDL.

It's outside the box but the injury situation makes it an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VirginiaMtlExpat

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,376
25,770
He wont be traded period. Not this year. Next year? Yes.
What if management are convinced both Reinbacher and Hutson will be in Montreal next year, or at least that it's more likely than not?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad