Playoffs Positivity Thread

Will the Habs make the playoffs?


  • Total voters
    73

Grate n Colorful Oz

Pure Laine Hutson
Jun 12, 2007
36,639
35,228
Hockey Mecca
What ever happens happens, still possible to make the playoffs. Personally I would prefer a top 5 pick, but I wouldn't mind playoffs. I'm ok with what ever outcome.

The problem with the whole "5 points from the playoffs" is that it's misleading and is missing a major component.

Look at win% in terms of points vs games played. The 16th team with the highest win% is +3 (NYR 31pts/28gp), while we are -4. So the actual difference is -7, which is huge when you consider a 100 points team needs +18 over 82 games to get those 100 points. -7 is almost half that full season slice. -7 in win% (in mean difference) is hard to overcome.
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
37,037
23,778
Nova Scotia
Visit site
Not sure why anyone was thinking playoffs in the 1st place.
I think most just wanted to make some noise around the wild card spots....just some noise.

My issue with them this year, is they should not be getting spanked 9-2 like last night.
They have had a few of these games, losing by 6-7 goals.....WTF???
They have to learn to be more, in the games......can't let that happen.

It would seem fragile is a term for young teams.........and when the goalie crumbles like last night, letting in goals they shouldn't the team is fragile and seems to stop playing.
Beyond Bad 3rd period......Beyond.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabbyGuy

HabbyGuy

Registered User
Apr 10, 2003
8,323
13,957
Hamilton Ontario
Visit site
I think most just wanted to make some noise around the wild card spots....just some noise.

My issue with them this year, is they should not be getting spanked 9-2 like last night.
They have had a few of these games, losing by 6-7 goals.....WTF???
They have to learn to be more, in the games......can't let that happen.

It would seem fragile is a term for young teams.........and when the goalie crumbles like last night, letting in goals they shouldn't the team is fragile and seems to stop playing.
Beyond Bad 3rd period......Beyond.

Yup it was ugly, no doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
14,064
28,066
Montréal
98csim (1).jpg


Close it up
 

Frankenheimer

Sir, this is an Arber
Feb 22, 2009
4,041
1,935
MTL
A lot can change in a few games. But something more radical than mixing lines is needed. Calling up a goalie would be a start. We used to have a lot more goalie competition in the past. I'm not sure why we've given up on it. Sitting some players would also be a good idea.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,755
74,261
Texas
A lot can change in a few games. But something more radical than mixing lines is needed. Calling up a goalie would be a start. We used to have a lot more goalie competition in the past. I'm not sure why we've given up on it. Sitting some players would also be a good idea.
Can't keep shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic. This team is quitting too easily and that's unacceptable. People pay alot of money for the Bell Center experience and Molson has to address the current state of this team with his managers. It's not about losing during a rebuild...it's about how you lose.
I would sit Dach next game, he is hurting the team. He was never anything special to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldCraig71

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
43,104
40,681
Montreal
I'll be very happy when management decide to change their goals for this season because it just isn't going to happen.
What is most disappointing is the Winning Culture they sold us on as being so important just doesn't exist right now.

Two seasons ago I was convinced we were on the right track but right now I just see holes lots of holes.
The time to sell is fast approaching IMO.

Once that is done I think maybe we can start to work on some of the specifics that need some serious attention.
I think the idea now is to try and make sure next season becomes what this season was supposed to be.
 

habbubba

Registered User
Jan 19, 2024
365
347
Parity is not an expression of dilution, quite the opposite.

The more there is talent, the more likely there is parity, because the level of leaguewide talent offsets the truly elite players.

The only reason we aren't living in a super defensive league caused by a swell of talent is because the league changed some rules, like making goalie equipment smaller. Otherwise, the same trend that was rising between 2010 and 2019, would've continued, where we were living a second dead puck era-level defense because there's not much time or space on the ice. It's still like that, but the smaller goalie equipment will invariably bring more goals (it's just physics and probability). The reason there's not much time or space on the ice is because of the talent level.

Look back at the 70's and 80's and see the effects of dilution. Greater disparity of teams, greater disparity of stats. We're not talking about simply adding two teams to 30 other teams here, which is a very small dilution (less than 10%). It was from 6 to 23 teams in less than 25 years. That's dilution.

From 2003 onwards, there were no expansions until Vegas in 2017. That period saw an influx of talent with zero expansion, which led to 2015 scoring being almost as low as the DPE.

Continuously adding talent without expansions (barring rule changes and/or new tech) will invariably cause more parity, because all team overalls get generally upgraded, making the difference from one team to the other, be much less.
Parity is the result of dilution and the cap as teams attempt to plug holes in the lineup due to annual roster turnover. All of which is not germane to the subject at hand of which is why Montreal may or may not make the playoffs. I commented as to why they are where they are, which is the topic if my geriatric memory serves me right. lol
 

Ad

Ad

Ad