Player Discussion: Liljegren Is Back

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Jonas just refuses to change his opinion on Liljegren.
He said you could trade him and ++ for Horvat.
Mirtle responded Leafs aren't trading Liljegren for a rental.
Jonas "why not"
Mirtle "you're giving up a cost controlled player and a RHD something you don't have much of for a 8 week forward? It makes no sense
Jonas "I don't agree. They just added Timmins and we'll see what he is. He's young and RHD. They have enough d man to make up for him.
Mirtle "I don't think they do" The way Mirtle said it was he was surprised Jonas made that last point. "You have 40 year old Gio, and Brodie whose getting older. We just came off a game where Liljegren was on the top pair and played well and big mins. You want to give that up for a rental.
Jonas " I think thats a conversation the front office would have to have".
Mirtle " I think it would be a short conversation to be perfectly honest".
Jonas "I think thats a mistake. If you aren't going to take a chance on a year you want to win the cup, because you want to keep Timothy Liljegren.
Mirtle " You take a chance but you don't do anything dumb
Jonas "thats dumb"?
Mirtle "yeah. I think it's a future core piece you're giving up for a guy you have for a month and a half"
Jonas, (in his shocked voice) "future core piece yeah maybe".

Good on Mirtle for responding back and not letting up.
 
Jonas just refuses to change his opinion on Liljegren.
He said you could trade him and ++ for Horvat.
Mirtle responded Leafs aren't trading Liljegren for a rental.
Jonas "why not"
Mirtle "you're giving up a cost controlled player and a RHD something you don't have much of for a 8 week forward? It makes no sense
Jonas "I don't agree. They just added Timmins and we'll see what he is. He's young and RHD. They have enough d man to make up for him.
Mirtle "I don't think they do" The way Mirtle said it was he was surprised Jonas made that last point. "You have 40 year old Gio, and Brodie whose getting older. We just came off a game where Liljegren was on the top pair and played well and big mins. You want to give that up for a rental.
Jonas " I think thats a conversation the front office would have to have".
Mirtle " I think it would be a short conversation to be perfectly honest".
Jonas "I think thats a mistake. If you aren't going to take a chance on a year you want to win the cup, because you want to keep Timothy Liljegren.
Mirtle " You take a chance but you don't do anything dumb
Jonas "thats dumb"?
Mirtle "yeah. I think it's a future core piece you're giving up for a guy you have for a month and a half"
Jonas, (in his shocked voice) "future core piece yeah maybe".

Good on Mirtle for responding back and not letting up.

I just listened to that part now and was going to post here lol. Not sure what Jonas was thinking. He's acting as if Liljegren doesn't play a huge role for this team

Timmins to replace him??? :laugh:
 
Jonas just refuses to change his opinion on Liljegren.
He said you could trade him and ++ for Horvat.
Mirtle responded Leafs aren't trading Liljegren for a rental.
Jonas "why not"
Mirtle "you're giving up a cost controlled player and a RHD something you don't have much of for a 8 week forward? It makes no sense
Jonas "I don't agree. They just added Timmins and we'll see what he is. He's young and RHD. They have enough d man to make up for him.
Mirtle "I don't think they do" The way Mirtle said it was he was surprised Jonas made that last point. "You have 40 year old Gio, and Brodie whose getting older. We just came off a game where Liljegren was on the top pair and played well and big mins. You want to give that up for a rental.
Jonas " I think thats a conversation the front office would have to have".
Mirtle " I think it would be a short conversation to be perfectly honest".
Jonas "I think thats a mistake. If you aren't going to take a chance on a year you want to win the cup, because you want to keep Timothy Liljegren.
Mirtle " You take a chance but you don't do anything dumb
Jonas "thats dumb"?
Mirtle "yeah. I think it's a future core piece you're giving up for a guy you have for a month and a half"
Jonas, (in his shocked voice) "future core piece yeah maybe".

Good on Mirtle for responding back and not letting up.
Wow, what an assclown that Jonas guy is. Is he trolling or is he that stupid?
Even one of Lilly's biggest hater (Hayes) has recognized and have back tracked on his opinion.
 
Jonas just refuses to change his opinion on Liljegren.
He said you could trade him and ++ for Horvat.
Mirtle responded Leafs aren't trading Liljegren for a rental.
Jonas "why not"
Mirtle "you're giving up a cost controlled player and a RHD something you don't have much of for a 8 week forward? It makes no sense
Jonas "I don't agree. They just added Timmins and we'll see what he is. He's young and RHD. They have enough d man to make up for him.
Mirtle "I don't think they do" The way Mirtle said it was he was surprised Jonas made that last point. "You have 40 year old Gio, and Brodie whose getting older. We just came off a game where Liljegren was on the top pair and played well and big mins. You want to give that up for a rental.
Jonas " I think thats a conversation the front office would have to have".
Mirtle " I think it would be a short conversation to be perfectly honest".
Jonas "I think thats a mistake. If you aren't going to take a chance on a year you want to win the cup, because you want to keep Timothy Liljegren.
Mirtle " You take a chance but you don't do anything dumb
Jonas "thats dumb"?
Mirtle "yeah. I think it's a future core piece you're giving up for a guy you have for a month and a half"
Jonas, (in his shocked voice) "future core piece yeah maybe".

Good on Mirtle for responding back and not letting up.
I am hyped about timmins but holy man...this is making It sounds like he's the next big thing. i mean if he is great for us...but...

 
Jonas just refuses to change his opinion on Liljegren.
He said you could trade him and ++ for Horvat.
Mirtle responded Leafs aren't trading Liljegren for a rental.
Jonas "why not"
Mirtle "you're giving up a cost controlled player and a RHD something you don't have much of for a 8 week forward? It makes no sense
Jonas "I don't agree. They just added Timmins and we'll see what he is. He's young and RHD. They have enough d man to make up for him.
Mirtle "I don't think they do" The way Mirtle said it was he was surprised Jonas made that last point. "You have 40 year old Gio, and Brodie whose getting older. We just came off a game where Liljegren was on the top pair and played well and big mins. You want to give that up for a rental.
Jonas " I think thats a conversation the front office would have to have".
Mirtle " I think it would be a short conversation to be perfectly honest".
Jonas "I think thats a mistake. If you aren't going to take a chance on a year you want to win the cup, because you want to keep Timothy Liljegren.
Mirtle " You take a chance but you don't do anything dumb
Jonas "thats dumb"?
Mirtle "yeah. I think it's a future core piece you're giving up for a guy you have for a month and a half"
Jonas, (in his shocked voice) "future core piece yeah maybe".

Good on Mirtle for responding back and not letting up.

Using Jonas logic, Timmins must be a great trade piece.
So Douglas ++ for Horvat?
 
Ah, Toronto media. Complain for years about not having a young right shot defenseman and postulating that we’d need to trade one of the core forwards for one, and then when the organization does draft and develop a RD try to ship him out asap for a rental. :rolleyes:

Timmins has been impressive but the idea that he’s made Liljegren expendable is a joke.
 
With Liljgren, Sandin, Timmins and Rielly by as early as next season, the Leafs will have a top 4 set for the next 10 years

Unfortunately I don’t see Sandin - Timmins or Reilly - Timmins working.

Reilly - Lilly/XXXX
Sandin - Lilly/XXXX
XXXX - Timmins

Still missing that bruiser but 4/6D spots should be filled for the foreseeable future
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224
Jonas just refuses to change his opinion on Liljegren.
He said you could trade him and ++ for Horvat.
Mirtle responded Leafs aren't trading Liljegren for a rental.
Jonas "why not"
Mirtle "you're giving up a cost controlled player and a RHD something you don't have much of for a 8 week forward? It makes no sense
Jonas "I don't agree. They just added Timmins and we'll see what he is. He's young and RHD. They have enough d man to make up for him.
Mirtle "I don't think they do" The way Mirtle said it was he was surprised Jonas made that last point. "You have 40 year old Gio, and Brodie whose getting older. We just came off a game where Liljegren was on the top pair and played well and big mins. You want to give that up for a rental.
Jonas " I think thats a conversation the front office would have to have".
Mirtle " I think it would be a short conversation to be perfectly honest".
Jonas "I think thats a mistake. If you aren't going to take a chance on a year you want to win the cup, because you want to keep Timothy Liljegren.
Mirtle " You take a chance but you don't do anything dumb
Jonas "thats dumb"?
Mirtle "yeah. I think it's a future core piece you're giving up for a guy you have for a month and a half"
Jonas, (in his shocked voice) "future core piece yeah maybe".

Good on Mirtle for responding back and not letting up.
Horvat for Liljegren doesn't even make us a better team.
 
Ya that was bad. Jonas sounded clueless about Liljegren and I find normally he has a decent grasp on most players.
Jonas has an awful grasp of cap/asset management. He's pretty much always saying to trade all our top picks/prospects/young players for rentals, during the Matthews/Marner contract negotiations didn't think there was any problem paying them as much as we did on only 5-6 year deals, etc.

He's a big basketball guy, and I think he's influenced too much by how a few star players can drive massive success in that league, where max contracts are handed out like candy, etc. In the NHL, depth is very important to playoff success, and you can be an awful/mediocre team even if you have few of the best players in the world (eg Edmonton at times during the McDavid era).
 
I just listened to that part now and was going to post here lol. Not sure what Jonas was thinking. He's acting as if Liljegren doesn't play a huge role for this team

Timmins to replace him??? :laugh:
While Timmins has added to depth, it is obvious that he is not premium defencemen. I would rank him # 8 on the depth chart

Who are you projecting as the #1 LD?

:sarcasm:
there is none
 
While Timmins has added to depth, it is obvious that he is not premium defencemen. I would rank him # 8 on the depth chart

While Timmins has added to depth, it is obvious that he is not premium defencemen. I would rank him # 8 on the depth chart

Lilljegren
Sandin
Timmins

Are all still in the development stage.

Repetition
 
I'm no doctor but I can only go by what I saw last night, I think he kinda saw the shot coming a bit, he looked like he was bracing for it, obviously it still sucks taking a shot where he did.

I don't think concussion, maybe precaution?

My luck at noon they'll say out for 1 month or something.
 
Lilljegren
Sandin
Timmins

Are all still in the development stage.

Repetition
Agreed. I think Timmins can definitely grow into a reliable 3rd pair RD who could also play PP2 given his puck moving skills. Can't wait to see our next trade with the Coyotes.
 
any word on the possibility of a concussion last night?

came into this thread to ask about Lily's injury update too

f***ing sheifele had him in almost a headlock so lily couldnt even defend himself against he rising puck and the refs didn't say f all.

shiefele is a pos
 
  • Like
Reactions: geo25
Keefe postgame

I haven’t heard. We are hopeful. It looked like he just got a puck to the face and was a little bit stunned by that. I am not sure if there is any damage in terms of a cut or anything, but he was having to go through the proper protocols
 
  • Like
Reactions: studebaker17

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad