Sideline
Registered User
- May 23, 2004
- 11,483
- 3,388
I 100% agree with you. It's basically how I treat this board now. It's an interactive blog.
Even the guys that **** post are better at it than Rossi.
I 100% agree with you. It's basically how I treat this board now. It's an interactive blog.
We can all admit we were wrong about Fleury, but maybe some credit to MAF for finding his game, too.
But I 1000000% agree the time to build accountability was the Flyers debacle. That was the moment coaches should have been fired, staff should have been fired, and players should have been moved to make way for young talent.
That was the big moment and we completely bit the dust on it. Most of the times, forums over-react and it's probably better to keep calm, but that was quie a debacle. I still believe it's a huge part of our troubling organizational issues we have still today. I won't blame all of it on that moment, but that's by far the turning point.
I 100% agree with you. It's basically how I treat this board now. It's an interactive blog.
DK's insider cites conversations with, presumably, Burkle that can be summed up as
Pretty sure he's getting played by his "source" for their own purposes, whatever they are. Penguins quietly let go of the #2 guy in business ops a few months ago. Usually doesn't happen when all is quiet on the Western front.
I don't believe for a minute that ownership is cool with what they've seen this season. I'm much more inclined to believe Til The End of Time's buddy, who says "ownership is furious."
Last year they bristled at the age and, perhaps more importantly, cost of the roster. The GM they brought in made it older and more expensive. They put one precondition on the coaching gig--to play an up-tempo, offensive, puck possession style of hockey. Rightly or wrongly, Johnston scuttled that to play a softer variation of Hitchcock hockey 40% of the way through the season. They're about to get bounced in the first round and many tickets were sold at deep discounts.
I don't care what DK was told; there's no way an owner is pleased in a year in which his revenue dropped and his dictates went ignored by his employees. His reaction would be the opposite of any person I've ever known who owned anything.
The thing that makes me even angrier is that they are so predictable in their manipulation. I'm no one special and I called it when the trade was made that we'd be treated to a vague, anonymous smear campaign. Just like the Neal requested a trade and was a cancer campaign.Not like this wasn't written more than once already, but again: "And even that one trade that doesn't look good from a hockey standpoint, Ben Lovejoy for Simon Despres, is viewed without regret for reasons beyond hockey pertaining to both men."
It's infuriating for me to read that. It makes me despise the uniform and turns me into one of these guys that just wants to root for individuals rather than the team.
This isn't on DK. Well, maybe part of it is because he was so bullish on the trade that now he has to own it no matter how bad it looks. There isn't a single person who knows even a little about hockey that watches Lovejoy play and doesn't think he's next to worthless, especially in comparison to who he was traded for.
But again man, it's the ****ing ownership group and the gaggle of GM's that make me wish I can punch each and every one of them in the face. It makes a dark part of me wish that the seats are empty next year and that the team I love and have supported from afar for 28 years would move to Kansas City, just to remind the powers that be that they're not as clever as they think they are.
DK is the messenger here, but the organization is the one feeding him and using him as a tool to control that message. I am willing to bet my life that if it wasn't for the fan backlash, as well as the harsh criticism about the trade from the hockey media OUTSIDE of Pittsburgh that we never hear a peep about character issues. But again, "control the message" at all costs.
Funny thing is, as a subscriber I can attest to the fact that this is about the 4th or 5th time DK's brought it up in a column, and I think it has everything to do with the fact that Simon is FLOURISHING in Anaheim and Lovejoy sucks beyond anything they could have imagined. In other words, the "character" issue was going to be brought up once after the move to soften the blow, and that would have been that. But since the trade keeps looking worse and worse as both players go in opposite directions, they need to keep reminding us that "Hey, it wasn't our fault. He wasn't applying himself."
LOL "For reasons beyond hockey." What a bunch of ********. Yeah, I'm sure they don't regret a single thing as they see Simon make an end to end play for a series winning goal two hours after Ben Lovejoy couldn't handle a 5'6" geriatric for an overtime winning goal. I'm sure they wouldn't do it all over again watching Despres register 20 hits against the biggest, baddest team in the league over a 4 game series while Lovejoy looks like he might disintegrate if he even makes contact with someone in an opposing uniform.
To make matters worse, this becomes a double whammy. Not only can they not properly evaluate talent, but they're a-hole spin doctors as well. Either tell us what his off ice "issues" were, or shut the **** up about it.
Not like this wasn't written more than once already, but again: "And even that one trade that doesn't look good from a hockey standpoint, Ben Lovejoy for Simon Despres, is viewed without regret for reasons beyond hockey pertaining to both men."
It's infuriating for me to read that. It makes me despise the uniform and turns me into one of these guys that just wants to root for individuals rather than the team.
This isn't on DK. Well, maybe part of it is because he was so bullish on the trade that now he has to own it no matter how bad it looks. There isn't a single person who knows even a little about hockey that watches Lovejoy play and doesn't think he's next to worthless, especially in comparison to who he was traded for.
But again man, it's the ****ing ownership group and the gaggle of GM's that make me wish I can punch each and every one of them in the face. It makes a dark part of me wish that the seats are empty next year and that the team I love and have supported from afar for 28 years would move to Kansas City, just to remind the powers that be that they're not as clever as they think they are.
DK is the messenger here, but the organization is the one feeding him and using him as a tool to control that message. I am willing to bet my life that if it wasn't for the fan backlash, as well as the harsh criticism about the trade from the hockey media OUTSIDE of Pittsburgh that we never hear a peep about character issues. But again, "control the message" at all costs.
Funny thing is, as a subscriber I can attest to the fact that this is about the 4th or 5th time DK's brought it up in a column, and I think it has everything to do with the fact that Simon is FLOURISHING in Anaheim and Lovejoy sucks beyond anything they could have imagined. In other words, the "character" issue was going to be brought up once after the move to soften the blow, and that would have been that. But since the trade keeps looking worse and worse as both players go in opposite directions, they need to keep reminding us that "Hey, it wasn't our fault. He wasn't applying himself."
LOL "For reasons beyond hockey." What a bunch of ********. Yeah, I'm sure they don't regret a single thing as they see Simon make an end to end play for a series winning goal two hours after Ben Lovejoy couldn't handle a 5'6" geriatric for an overtime winning goal. I'm sure they wouldn't do it all over again watching Despres register 20 hits against the biggest, baddest team in the league over a 4 game series while Lovejoy looks like he might disintegrate if he even makes contact with someone in an opposing uniform.
To make matters worse, this becomes a double whammy. Not only can they not properly evaluate talent, but they're a-hole spin doctors as well. Either tell us what his off ice "issues" were, or shut the **** up about it.
Not like this wasn't written more than once already, but again: "And even that one trade that doesn't look good from a hockey standpoint, Ben Lovejoy for Simon Despres, is viewed without regret for reasons beyond hockey pertaining to both men."
It's infuriating for me to read that. It makes me despise the uniform and turns me into one of these guys that just wants to root for individuals rather than the team.
This isn't on DK. Well, maybe part of it is because he was so bullish on the trade that now he has to own it no matter how bad it looks. There isn't a single person who knows even a little about hockey that watches Lovejoy play and doesn't think he's next to worthless, especially in comparison to who he was traded for.
But again man, it's the ****ing ownership group and the gaggle of GM's that make me wish I can punch each and every one of them in the face. It makes a dark part of me wish that the seats are empty next year and that the team I love and have supported from afar for 28 years would move to Kansas City, just to remind the powers that be that they're not as clever as they think they are.
DK is the messenger here, but the organization is the one feeding him and using him as a tool to control that message. I am willing to bet my life that if it wasn't for the fan backlash, as well as the harsh criticism about the trade from the hockey media OUTSIDE of Pittsburgh that we never hear a peep about character issues. But again, "control the message" at all costs.
Funny thing is, as a subscriber I can attest to the fact that this is about the 4th or 5th time DK's brought it up in a column, and I think it has everything to do with the fact that Simon is FLOURISHING in Anaheim and Lovejoy sucks beyond anything they could have imagined. In other words, the "character" issue was going to be brought up once after the move to soften the blow, and that would have been that. But since the trade keeps looking worse and worse as both players go in opposite directions, they need to keep reminding us that "Hey, it wasn't our fault. He wasn't applying himself."
LOL "For reasons beyond hockey." What a bunch of ********. Yeah, I'm sure they don't regret a single thing as they see Simon make an end to end play for a series winning goal two hours after Ben Lovejoy couldn't handle a 5'6" geriatric for an overtime winning goal. I'm sure they wouldn't do it all over again watching Despres register 20 hits against the biggest, baddest team in the league over a 4 game series while Lovejoy looks like he might disintegrate if he even makes contact with someone in an opposing uniform.
To make matters worse, this becomes a double whammy. Not only can they not properly evaluate talent, but they're a-hole spin doctors as well. Either tell us what his off ice "issues" were, or shut the **** up about it.
We’ve been missing guys all year, and it’s hard to get into your rhythm and team identity.
http://dkonpittsburghsports.com/2015/04/25/column-these-penguins-could-still-fly-with-wings/
-Morehouse is the guy who says neither Johnston nor Rutherford are being fired. I'm even more skeptical knowing it's him, but it would be an awful tough sell to fire Johnston, considering how much mileage he got out of a terrible forward group
-says Penguins plan next year is to go young on D. As in, to actually do that this time instead of seeking stopgaps in free agency. Says they know there will be big time growing pains.
-says it's likely Kunitz and Scuderi both get bought out
-says Crosby, Malkin, Sutter, Laps are your centers going forward
-says team executives don't like practically any of their wings. Think they're too slow and that it kills them. Says that's number 1 on the to-do list "not with a bullet, but with a rocket." They do like Wilson, which is beyond my understanding based on what I saw. He wasn't terrible, but he was pretty blah, imo. Not nearly fast enough to be as small and modestly talented as he looks to be
-cleans up that Crosby quote about lacking identity considerably from what I think I heard on NHL network
I was on the phone, so it's possible I heard it wrong, but this is not what I heard him say.
-for reasons I cannot fathom, DK believes it's easy to replace a bunch of slow, useless players at wing with burners. It's all well and good to say "all we need to do is get a bunch of fast players at wing," but where the Hell will they come from? They're not in NHL UFA, not in the minors (considering neither Megna nor Farnham were called up) and, if we're not trading Sutter, we have nothing to trade for them. He throws Kapanen out there, but is that guy really ready? Nyquist is similar and the Wings left him in the minors until 23.
-generally DK thinks we're close. I suppose that's true, if we can figure out how to do a thing that seems practically impossible
DK is nothing but a glorified Morehouse mouthpiece.
I just called him out on his site for the Despres coverage. Politely asked for two apologies to the fans he belittled and to Despres for spreading rumors from the Team. He censored the question. HACK
DK is nothing but a glorified Morehouse mouthpiece.
http://dkonpittsburghsports.com/2015/04/25/column-these-penguins-could-still-fly-with-wings/
-Morehouse is the guy who says neither Johnston nor Rutherford are being fired. I'm even more skeptical knowing it's him, but it would be an awful tough sell to fire Johnston, considering how much mileage he got out of a terrible forward group
-says Penguins plan next year is to go young on D. As in, to actually do that this time instead of seeking stopgaps in free agency. Says they know there will be big time growing pains.
-says it's likely Kunitz and Scuderi both get bought out
-says Crosby, Malkin, Sutter, Laps are your centers going forward
-says team executives don't like practically any of their wings. Think they're too slow and that it kills them. Says that's number 1 on the to-do list "not with a bullet, but with a rocket." They do like Wilson, which is beyond my understanding based on what I saw. He wasn't terrible, but he was pretty blah, imo. Not nearly fast enough to be as small and modestly talented as he looks to be
-cleans up that Crosby quote about lacking identity considerably from what I think I heard on NHL network
I was on the phone, so it's possible I heard it wrong, but this is not what I heard him say.
-for reasons I cannot fathom, DK believes it's easy to replace a bunch of slow, useless players at wing with burners. It's all well and good to say "all we need to do is get a bunch of fast players at wing," but where the Hell will they come from? They're not in NHL UFA, not in the minors (considering neither Megna nor Farnham were called up) and, if we're not trading Sutter, we have nothing to trade for them. He throws Kapanen out there, but is that guy really ready? Nyquist is similar and the Wings left him in the minors until 23.
-generally DK thinks we're close. I suppose that's true, if we can figure out how to do a thing that seems practically impossible
Yeah, but Rossi blatantly lies. In case you've forgotten, we're talking about a guy who went on the radio in 2013 and said that Malkin would be traded, then wrote an article chastising "rumormongers" who were spreading false rumors about Malkin being moved. The only person spreading that rumor was freaking Rossi.
I hope he's blatantly lying about Malkin.
But, really, if you think about it, if Malkin had a selfish bone in his body, then wouldn't he be wondering to himself 'I'm trying to play through this with a bad back, and the best they can do to help me is a gimp wristed Blake Comeau'?
Same thing with Sid. The picture of perfection, Jonathan Toews, plays with Saad and Hossa. What's Sid got? Horny? Horny should be the second best winger on a line with Sid, and only the way in which this organization ****** over Geno is more embarrassing than the way in which they ****** over Sid.
Is Rossi lying? Probably. But, would you really be surprised to one day soon see Sid and/or Geno say 'enough is enough'.
Maybe that day comes, but if it does, Rossi will be the last guy to know about it. Especially with Sid. Does Sid even grant him interviews? I generally stopped reading his articles after the "debunking my own Malkin rumor" thing, but before that, I can't particularly remember any Sid quotes in them.
KIRK has been trying to push the "Malkin wants out" line for exactly as long as Rossi has.