Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 30,525
- 26,044
I mean I hope Pickering gets there, but the fact he's not a first choice guy when all his pedigree and the pre-season chat pointed to him being one does leave me with questions.
there are times when politics gets involved. not say'en that's the case.I mean I hope Pickering gets there, but the fact he's not a first choice guy when all his pedigree and the pre-season chat pointed to him being one does leave me with questions.
Probably being on a bad team 3 years running isn’t helping, either.there are times when politics gets involved. not say'en that's the case.
there are times when politics gets involved. not say'en that's the case.
I found it a bit odd also, however so far in practice they have Yager in a bottom six role and not on either of the PP units, which suggests he may be in more of a checking/energy type role. I've never seen Firkus play, but perhaps that type of role doesn't suit his game.Firkus didn’t make it? Seems odd. Outscoring Yager and you’ve got 2/3rds of a line with proven chemistry right there.
Firkus didn’t make it? Seems odd. Outscoring Yager and you’ve got 2/3rds of a line with proven chemistry right there.
bit weak that a 1st round prospect with an "NHL-shot" cant even crrack the 2nd unit tbhI found it a bit odd also, however so far in practice they have Yager in a bottom six role and not on either of the PP units, which suggests he may be in more of a checking/energy type role. I've never seen Firkus play, but perhaps that type of role doesn't suit his game.
Almost everyone there is a 1st rounder and most are a year older.bit weak that a 1st round prospect with an "NHL-shot" cant even crrack the 2nd unit tbh
It's always a concern to me when a high pick isn't playing at a level considered to be one of the best at his age group by that age.I mean I hope Pickering gets there, but the fact he's not a first choice guy when all his pedigree and the pre-season chat pointed to him being one does leave me with questions.
It's always a concern to me when a high pick isn't playing at a level considered to be one of the best at his age group by that age.
Obviously not a guarantee of failure, but not a good sign.
The cool thing is that Dubas drafted all three of them, and they're all also eligible next year. 18-year-olds don't always make World Juniors Rosters, so it's cool that we may have half of our past year's draft to watch in the World Juniors.Both Pienimeimi and Kangas are on Finlands camp roster. I think they will only cut 1D. Pienimiemi looks like a lock. And my guess is Kangas are fighting for the 7d spot. Bit of a surprise he even among the 8D.
So with som luck we will have 3 players at the WJC in Yager, Pieinnni and Kamgas.
But the only lock is probably Pinimiemi.
Wasn't Pickering the opposite of taking a risk? I thought his "ceiling" was low and didn't project to be anything more than a second pairing guy (ie. a Marcus Pettersson type) because of his limited perceived offensive upside?The issue with taking risks.
Wasn't Pickering the opposite of taking a risk? I thought his "ceiling" was low and didn't project to be anything more than a second pairing guy (ie. a Marcus Pettersson type) because of his limited perceived offensive upside?
Pickering was always gonna be a project. Any time a guy has to grow into his frame to the degree he had to, you're talking about a good handful of years before he's even ready to test NHL capability imo. Wouldn't really worry about him for another couple of years tbh. If he's still meh or stagnated then whatever. Kind of expected with ~20th picks.
For sure.I think he is one of those players who is boom or bust.
I also think a lot of his development will be done in the A / NHL versus juniors.
Knowing our organization we will try to make him a shutdown third pairing D who PKs..
Pickering was definitely boom or bust but more of in a “he could be an extremely valuable unicorn type that you only get via the draft” rather than putting up a ton of points.
Pickering was definitely boom or bust but more of in a “he could be an extremely valuable unicorn type that you only get via the draft” rather than putting up a ton of points.
Like, I'm not necessarily saying I'm down on Pickering or that he's a lost cause. I'm just saying that it's discouraging - at this time - that he doesn't seem to be among the best defensemen at his age group. Would have been nice if he was a lock to play at the WJC and be a top 4 guy, which would be an indication that - at this time - he's trending to being among the best of his age group.
It's amazing how our "risky" prospects don't seem to materialize but other team's risky prospects turn into Jason Robertson, Brayden Point, and Mark Stone.But that's the issue with taking risks. They don't always pop.
People ask us to take risky prospects. Pickering is one.
It's amazing how our "risky" prospects don't seem to materialize but other team's risky prospects turn into Jason Robertson, Brayden Point, and Mark Stone.