Prospect Info: Pittsburgh Penguins Prospects Thread: 2023-2024 Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,525
26,044
I mean I hope Pickering gets there, but the fact he's not a first choice guy when all his pedigree and the pre-season chat pointed to him being one does leave me with questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dipsy Doodle

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,178
5,196
burgh
I mean I hope Pickering gets there, but the fact he's not a first choice guy when all his pedigree and the pre-season chat pointed to him being one does leave me with questions.
there are times when politics gets involved. not say'en that's the case.:laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,525
26,044
there are times when politics gets involved. not say'en that's the case.:laugh:

Hence questions rather than doubts. A further look reveals a lot of odd exclusions and cuts.

At the same time, it doesn't feel like he's taking the big strides that'll make people super happy.


Btw, puff piece on Ilyin

 

Gumbercules

Registered User
Oct 11, 2007
5,992
2,487
Firkus didn’t make it? Seems odd. Outscoring Yager and you’ve got 2/3rds of a line with proven chemistry right there.
I found it a bit odd also, however so far in practice they have Yager in a bottom six role and not on either of the PP units, which suggests he may be in more of a checking/energy type role. I've never seen Firkus play, but perhaps that type of role doesn't suit his game.
 

deakka

Registered User
Nov 6, 2009
4,814
939
I found it a bit odd also, however so far in practice they have Yager in a bottom six role and not on either of the PP units, which suggests he may be in more of a checking/energy type role. I've never seen Firkus play, but perhaps that type of role doesn't suit his game.
bit weak that a 1st round prospect with an "NHL-shot" cant even crrack the 2nd unit tbh
 

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
50,257
26,930
bit weak that a 1st round prospect with an "NHL-shot" cant even crrack the 2nd unit tbh
Almost everyone there is a 1st rounder and most are a year older.

Yager's even still eligible for next year's squad.
 
Last edited:

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,764
49,181
I mean I hope Pickering gets there, but the fact he's not a first choice guy when all his pedigree and the pre-season chat pointed to him being one does leave me with questions.
It's always a concern to me when a high pick isn't playing at a level considered to be one of the best at his age group by that age.

Obviously not a guarantee of failure, but not a good sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peat

OtherThingsILike

Registered User
May 6, 2020
1,722
1,467
Pittsburgh
Both Pienimeimi and Kangas are on Finlands camp roster. I think they will only cut 1D. Pienimiemi looks like a lock. And my guess is Kangas are fighting for the 7d spot. Bit of a surprise he even among the 8D.

So with som luck we will have 3 players at the WJC in Yager, Pieinnni and Kamgas.
But the only lock is probably Pinimiemi.
The cool thing is that Dubas drafted all three of them, and they're all also eligible next year. 18-year-olds don't always make World Juniors Rosters, so it's cool that we may have half of our past year's draft to watch in the World Juniors.
 

Big Friggin Dummy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
25,924
25,121
Pickering was always gonna be a project. Any time a guy has to grow into his frame to the degree he had to, you're talking about a good handful of years before he's even ready to test NHL capability imo. Wouldn't really worry about him for another couple of years tbh. If he's still meh or stagnated then whatever. Kind of expected with ~20th picks.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,350
78,286
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Wasn't Pickering the opposite of taking a risk? I thought his "ceiling" was low and didn't project to be anything more than a second pairing guy (ie. a Marcus Pettersson type) because of his limited perceived offensive upside?

No. The idea with Pickering was that with his size, skating and puck handling that he could be a potential huge hit if everything went right.

If anything I'd argue his defensive game is his weakness that prevented him from making the WJC this year.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,350
78,286
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Pickering was always gonna be a project. Any time a guy has to grow into his frame to the degree he had to, you're talking about a good handful of years before he's even ready to test NHL capability imo. Wouldn't really worry about him for another couple of years tbh. If he's still meh or stagnated then whatever. Kind of expected with ~20th picks.

I think he is one of those players who is boom or bust.

I also think a lot of his development will be done in the A / NHL versus juniors.

Knowing our organization we will try to make him a shutdown third pairing D who PKs..
 

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
9,429
10,266
Pickering was definitely boom or bust but more of in a “he could be an extremely valuable unicorn type that you only get via the draft” rather than putting up a ton of points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peat

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,525
26,044
Pickering was definitely boom or bust but more of in a “he could be an extremely valuable unicorn type that you only get via the draft” rather than putting up a ton of points.

This. A hundred times this.

Along with BFD said about being a project. There probably wasn't a prospect further away from his projected self in the first round.

I would also add that after guys like Karlsson and Letang i.e. true do it all 1Ds, guys who are like Pettersson is now or Dumo was at his peak at my most coveted dmen and, yeah, really hard to get if you don't develop them yourself.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,350
78,286
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Pickering was definitely boom or bust but more of in a “he could be an extremely valuable unicorn type that you only get via the draft” rather than putting up a ton of points.

What are we saying by "a ton of points".

Pickering from the sources I trust with prospects was viewed as a two-way, potential top pairing PP guy who could put up 30-50 pts.

Just to be clear I said he was a "risk".
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
36,103
31,109
I'm still not that worried about Pickering. His team stinks and there aren't any notable players on that roster that I can detect. Would be nice for him to be healthy for a Pens training camp though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Malkinstheman

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,764
49,181
Like, I'm not necessarily saying I'm down on Pickering or that he's a lost cause. I'm just saying that it's discouraging - at this time - that he doesn't seem to be among the best defensemen at his age group. Would have been nice if he was a lock to play at the WJC and be a top 4 guy, which would be an indication that - at this time - he's trending to being among the best of his age group.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,350
78,286
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Like, I'm not necessarily saying I'm down on Pickering or that he's a lost cause. I'm just saying that it's discouraging - at this time - that he doesn't seem to be among the best defensemen at his age group. Would have been nice if he was a lock to play at the WJC and be a top 4 guy, which would be an indication that - at this time - he's trending to being among the best of his age group.

But that's the issue with taking risks. They don't always pop.

People ask us to take risky prospects. Pickering is one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freeptop

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
56,764
49,181
But that's the issue with taking risks. They don't always pop.

People ask us to take risky prospects. Pickering is one.
It's amazing how our "risky" prospects don't seem to materialize but other team's risky prospects turn into Jason Robertson, Brayden Point, and Mark Stone. :sarcasm:
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,350
78,286
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
It's amazing how our "risky" prospects don't seem to materialize but other team's risky prospects turn into Jason Robertson, Brayden Point, and Mark Stone. :sarcasm:

I mean, I think judging Pickering as not materializing is a little harsh.

He was pretty much anticipated by all the junior writers as being a top pairing D for the WJC team.

Hockey yers.Canada isn't exactly an organization that is known for always taking the best players.

It'll be interesting though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darren McCord
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad