This would have been so much better. I know some Pens fans at the time thought the goalie market was too barren that summer to risk losing Jarry, but I never understood that logic. Risk losing what? (Until then) decent regular season numbers followed by a backbreaking playoff boner?
If we hadve gone cheap, and kept flexibility, there was always the opportunity to pounce on a guy via an opportunistic trade, like Markstrom or Ullmark. And if we had missed the playoffs a cheaper tandem/trio netminder on a short term deal would’ve been a fine trade asset. Not the hapless boat anchor We wound up with
Hindsight, I agree 100%. The clearly correct route would have been to not resign him. But that's hindsight through 2025 lenses.
At the time, the focus on Jarry's struggles were largely the playoffs and being healthy for the playoffs. He did struggle for a couple of games that year but still sported a .910sv%, with the previous year being 0.919 (with 24 and 34 wins, respectively). He was also a two-time all-star. So, it's not like at the time he had the stats he has today.
So while there were concerns about whether or not he could up his game in the playoffs, I think the bigger concern was about money and term. I do remember discussing whether or not it was worth bringing him back, with most being "okay, depending on the contract" and most balking instantly at what he got. That was me, as one example. $5.35 for 2 years, fine. 5yrs at $2mil, fine. 5x5.35mil, not fine .
So from that context, I think there was a bit more on the line. If you choose not to do it and let Talbot, CDS, and I guess Neds "battle" it out and it falls apart (like it ironically did with Jarry), man that puts the dunce hat on Dubas just as much as it is now. Especially if Jarry goes elsewhere and turns in an average performance.
And saying "they shouldn't have resigned Jarry in 2023 because Markstrom and Ullmark would have been available in 2024" isn't a great argument because future availability of guys like is impossible to determine. Hell, didn't the owner of the Flames flat out say they weren't trading him? If GM's had that kind of clarity or crystal ball, Dubas wouldn't have signed him in the first place but for different reasons.