kb
Registered User
- Aug 28, 2009
- 15,355
- 22,015
Depth scoring recently, definitely. But shaky goaltending at key moments hasn't helped.So the Leafs failures in the playoffs have been lack of goal scoring?
Depth scoring recently, definitely. But shaky goaltending at key moments hasn't helped.So the Leafs failures in the playoffs have been lack of goal scoring?
When the frame of the discussion is that the Leafs have had and will continue to have mediocre playoff goaltending the answer is a big fat yes. At this point this team has to find a way to win like Colorado did this playoffs: averaging 4 goal per game while receiving mediocre goaltending. The Leafs need depth of scoring to make that happen. The Leafs has literally entrusted its 2022-23 playoff hopes on two rejected NHL starters from the 2021-22 season.So the Leafs failures in the playoffs have been lack of goal scoring?
What was the score in game 7?So the Leafs failures in the playoffs have been lack of goal scoring?
Some people need to look up arbitration because they clearly have never heard of it
What was the score in game 7?
They won’t be that close to the cap with only 20 players that can’t clear waivers. If two guys are banged up and can’t play, then they’ll play two short or put one or both on IR for at least seven days.Sure you can. Emergency call ups. All you have to do is play 1 game short and you can call players up if they make under 1 million.
That’s why we sign a bunch of players.
Fair enough number, not a fan of the player though.
He has room for improvement.Fair enough number, not a fan of the player though.
Same here .. I thought maybe 10% pay increase from last year but no more than 1.5M per .. da extra amount means 1 less player on rosterLike the player some, not the number so much.
Just wondering….is their a adult forum to chat leaf hockey?
I registered here not long ago but it’s seems like a bunch of 12 yr olds in a lot of these threads …. constantly complaining about 1st rd playoff losses and lack of goal scoring….
Depth in scoringWhen the frame of the discussion is that the Leafs have had and will continue to have mediocre playoff goaltending the answer is a big fat yes. At this point this team has to find a way to win like Colorado did this playoffs: averaging 4 goal per game while receiving mediocre goaltending. The Leafs need depth of scoring to make that happen. The Leafs has literally entrusted its 2022-23 playoff hopes on two rejected NHL starters from the 2021-22 season.
Indeed but they haven't gotten it done 6 seasons in a row. We've got to get it done some other way. That's either depth scoring or a stud goalie who wins a game on his own.Depth in scoring
We are paying top dollar for Mathew’s,and co.
They are the guys who are letting us down when the playoffs come around.
Can't blame anyone for being critical of using 2.25 on a piece that isn't the right fit for our playoff runs. We haven't won anything, so priority should be on correct fits with our limited cap space.Engvall is an asset that can be played or traded.
He isn't on a bad contract, and his contract has value to the Leafs whether or not he's the right piece for their roster.
If Engvall doesn't fit, then Engvall and other pieces might be used to get the pieces the Leafs need. At $2.25M on a one-year term, that contract could be easily moved got something else of roughly equal value. It is a plus.
Imagine giving Engvall 2.25 as part of your plan to re-shape our bottom 6. When he said re-shape I thought he meant getting rid of all zero value playoff assets.Can't blame anyone for being critical of using 2.25 on a piece that isn't the right fit for our playoff runs. We haven't won anything, so priority should be on correct fits with our limited cap space.
The return for Engvall @ 2.25 isn't appealing enough for me to sign him as trade capital. Plus adds an extra layer of complexity if we need to make a move that actually makes us a better playoff team.