Identity404
I'm not superstitious, but I am a little stitious
Khudobin gave up more goals than Ward did. The difference is the timing of the Hurricanes goals. So clearly, Ward needs to score more.
Khudobin only gave up 2.
Khudobin gave up more goals than Ward did. The difference is the timing of the Hurricanes goals. So clearly, Ward needs to score more.
2 is not more than 3Khudobin gave up more goals than Ward did. The difference is the timing of the Hurricanes goals. So clearly, Ward needs to score more.
.908sv% for Ward vs .906sv% for Ellis
Unfortunately the Ward revisionists have painted last season as a "this is what happens when mcamwardo is injured!" lesson, totally forgetting that Peters ended up starting a 1/3rd of the season while posting a .891sv% and Skinner's post-concussion horrible play, Faulk's injury, Pitkanen's injury, etc.
Just compare Ward's sv% from the start of last season to Ellis and Khudobin. Says all you need to know. But somehow Ward is still god's gift to goaltending while his back-ups possibly starting over him is a huge joke because Conn Smythe 2006.
You said it yourself:
But no, the team in front playing like **** has nothing to do with the goals given up. Clearly, Ward's supposed to play defense as well, to prevent the 3rd and 4th goals.
And I'm embarrassing myself? Ward literally steals a point against LA, then comes in cold against a team that's outplaying the Canes (your words), and he's suddenly to blame for all that's wrong?
Man, it's a good thing some of you aren't making decisions. We'd be going through 30 goaltenders a year.
See what I mean, lynk?
Difference here is that you can never tell with this guy if he's serious or not...
Did you watch the first two periods when we got literally every single call, including a questionable delay-of-game that gave us a 5-on-3 for almost a full two minutes and a few that could just as easily been called dives? We're getting outplayed. This result has nothing to do with the refs. Are they consistent? No. Are they costing us this game? No freakin' way.
that's kind of telling in and of itself.
.908sv% for Ward vs .906sv% for Ellis
Unfortunately the Ward revisionists have painted last season as a "this is what happens when mcamwardo is injured!" lesson, totally forgetting that Peters ended up starting a 1/3rd of the season while posting a .891sv% and Skinner's post-concussion horrible play, Faulk's injury, Pitkanen's injury, etc.
Just compare Ward's sv% from the start of last season to Ellis and Khudobin. Says all you need to know. But somehow Ward is still god's gift to goaltending while his back-ups possibly starting over him is a huge joke because Conn Smythe 2006..
The only issue I have was calling embellishment on Ruutu when he was hooked in the process of trying to shoot the puck. He fanned on it, and was overbalanced, which is why he feel. We got 9 PP's, so complaining about the refs on that one issue seems a little silly.
Speaking of Ruutu, holy crap is he slow as molasses. He wasn't effective at all.
He drew 3 penalties. So he was somewhat effective.
The only issue I have was calling embellishment on Ruutu when he was hooked in the process of trying to shoot the puck. He fanned on it, and was overbalanced, which is why he feel. We got 9 PP's, so complaining about the refs on that one issue seems a little silly.
Speaking of Ruutu, holy crap is he slow as molasses. He wasn't effective at all.
Honestly, this is why I have a problem with calling embellishment on the ice at all. Usually when they call the penalty, it's something like this- a guy having his legs cut out cornering, a guy already off balance, a guy getting knocked over easily because he wasn't suspecting a hit, or that somebody would be trying to take his legs out at that moment. Remember, the whole point is that the other guy is doing something outside the bounds of the rules, which means players aren't always preparing for that thing to happen.
They never get it right. IMO, the best way to address diving is supplemental discipline- with a hearing and replays where they can see things more than once and hear the player make his case.
If you do it on the ice, you get jokes like Williams getting called for diving after being tackled. Or this. Or Semin the other night.
I honestly don't think I've seen a diving call during a game that I've felt to be a good one, and I still see lots of dives the refs completely ignore.
To second what someone else mentioned, why not gerbe on the first? I could care less about the defensive profiiciences of the second. We aren't going anywhere with that as our second.