Fairview
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2016
- 1,427
- 683
I guess if IA didn't want Glendale Council to see their books, then they shouldn't have gone to them asking for money. Especially in light of the fact that they were supposed to pay Glendale back a certain amount of the revenues brought in.Neither will I. I’ve jumped on a couple of fans who had the attitude that they didn’t care, they just wanted their hockey fix.
I was also guilty of jumping on the IA bandwagon against Glendale at first but as things progressed and more information came out you couldn’t stay on. That’s probably why I’m taking the position I am now in regards to the compliance review. IIRC the beef centered around Glendale wanting access to some of the proprietary info IA held and what could be made public. And IA’s position wasn’t much different than any of the other teams in regards to wanting their books open to the public. It also wasn’t any secret that a couple of council members couldn’t keep their mouths shut.
So I have to give IA some benefit of doubt, even if it turned out they really were using funds where they shouldn’t.
IA to Glendale.." No, you can't look at our books, you will have to trust us" or " we will only allow a select few to take a peek...we nominate Tyndal as your rep to see the numbers"
I can't remember, was there any consideration for an independent accounting of the team's books?
Last edited: