TheLegend
Hardly Deactivated
We both know the answer to that. Fortress wanted the money from the city because IA didn't have the collateral. Fortress knew what they were dealing with.There is a very good possibility that without the payments directed as such, there would be no loan agreement. Big difference for IA.
No..... we don't know what Fortress wanted.... nor do we know the loan depended upon direct payments. Other than payments needed to be made to Fortress on a regular basis and IA wanted some flexibility. Even that is speculation on my part just as you're speculating.
Now that I have answered your question Maybe you could answer the question I have asked from you 2 previous times. Why would the Coyote fans have a right to be mad at Glendale?The only thing that I could think of with your reference of the 2.5 million shortfall, is that you think that Glendale should have just accepted that, along with all the other failures on the IA end of the agreement. If that is the wrong assumption then please explain that comment. You want to talk about moving the goalposts. You have not even been on the field when it comes to answering that question.
Coyotes fans had a right to be angry at Glendale since they initiated the termination of the lease which put the franchise in the limbo it stands in today. After seven years of uncertainty and abuse from outside fan bases over the "worthiness" of being an NHL city, the 15 year lease with IA gave Coyotes fans a sense that there was going to finally be stability. Only to see the city rip that wound open again less than two years later.
Also.... in my previous comment I said right after that....
At the same time many weren’t pleased with IA either.
I've said on more than one occasion that I didn't like what Glendale did.... still don't..... but I also understood why they probably wanted to eliminate or reduce the additional $9M per year they were paying out. When Barroway joined into IA he brought additional financial support to the franchise, and I would speculate Glendale felt that additional $9M per year they were supplying was no longer necessary.
Also.... if you recall.... in the months prior to Glendale terminating the lease..... IA had entered into some discussions with the city to amend it, allowing some changes to what they charged for non-hockey events in order to fill more dates at the arena. Everything IA appeared to be doing at the time was to make the arena successful. But yes.... there was the financial review.... the squabbling between IA and the city over just what financial records could be audited. etc.