How many players played on their teams 3rd line and put up 40 points last year?
A decent number. Eller's had 38 and 36 his past two full seasons as a 3C, and on pace for 46 right now. Bozak 38 last year. Coyle on pace for 43 right now. Thornton 51 last year, Tyler Johnson 47, Eakin 41. There aren't as many teams with a defined 3C these days since lines are more flexible and the dedicated "3rd line checking line" isn't as common so your 3C can be more situational, but for a great team 40p is a pretty reasonable ballpark figure for a defined 3C.
So does that mean we should call Malkin a 2nd line center, because a contender wants/needs a guy as good as him in that #2 slot? Or should we call him a 1st line center because he's one of the best centers out there and acknowledge contenders need 1st line quality players on their 2nd line?
From the post you're replying to:
"It's just frustrating that we keep having the same circular arguments about whether Danault is a 1C or not because the point is if you want to contend you need to have a center (and ideally two) who's so good it is absurd to even ask the question"
Not sure what the Malkin gotcha is supposed to mean. I'm saying exactly that (contenders need 1st liners on their 2nd lines).
I said I think Danault is an adequate 1C, good 2C, and super luxury 3C with a direct comparison to someone like Jordan Staal. What I'm arguing is that the fact there's even an argument and that we need to use all these qualifiers like "underrated" and "better than the sum of their parts" about our top line and 1C means it's not good enough.