Scriptor
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 7,897
- 4,875
Maybe, but I think he might more likely be our 2C or 2RW or even 1RW.
I might try this for one year while Caufield learns the pro game in Laval:
Kovalchuk-Domi-Suzuki
Tatar-Danault-Gallagher
Drouin-Kotkaniemi-Armia
Byron-Evans-Lehkonen
That third line would be Lehkonen - Evans - Byron, if you follow the likeliest LW/RW deployment but, I'd also consider Lehkonen - Poehling -Byron with Evans as a 13th forward over Weal.
However, with that lineup and Julien as head coach, his depth chart for the lineup will likely be, even if the top-6 minutes are relatively close between the two lines:
Tatar-Danault-Gallagher
Kovalchuk-Domi-Suzuki
Drouin-Kotkaniemi-Armia
Byron-Evans-Lehkonen
I know this is a proposition without trades but, I suspect one of Domi or Drouin gets shipped out for immediate help on LD.
Ideally, for the medium term, at least, Mon would be better off signing a younger, prouctive RHD to replace Petry (a few years younger than Petry would help, even if it would mean leaving Chiarot unprotected in the expansion draft). We could/would then trade Petry for a pick and/or a near NHL-ready LW prospect with skill and some size to replace Kovalchuk later on in the year or the following year.
A team deep at LD might also want/need a 3rd-pairing LD coming back in a trade and MON has the serviceable Mete to offer as part of a trade package.