Baseball and Hockey guys are probably the most superstitious athletesAnd here I thought you were going to say it was because you had already developed a superstition, even though you knew it didn't matter. What kind of Baseball Guy even are you?
Baseball and Hockey guys are probably the most superstitious athletesAnd here I thought you were going to say it was because you had already developed a superstition, even though you knew it didn't matter. What kind of Baseball Guy even are you?
It's no question the deal structure is much better for the Dodgers. No clue if it was the desired outcome for Ohtani too, but the structure does allow them to spend more now while he is on the team in order to win. His only financial benefit is the taxes he avoids by moving out of CA in 10 years.Is there a scenario in which the USD doesn't decrease in value as estimated and years 11-20 are catastrophic for the Dodgers? I'm struggling a bit to understand why they'd opt for this sort of structure instead of a 10 year backloaded contract to where the AAV is actually $43-46MM.
The other potential financial benefit is that he's getting paid substantially more by accepting this type of deal structure.It's no question the deal structure is much better for the Dodgers. No clue if it was the desired outcome for Ohtani too, but the structure does allow them to spend more now while he is on the team in order to win. His only financial benefit is the taxes he avoids by moving out of CA in 10 years.
I think the deferred contracts would be more popular if players were willing to do them.
I think the Dodgers are one of a few teams with enough financial stability to commit to a 20 year contract with the majority of the money due in the final decade. I can't see this becoming popular across the league. Let's say that the estimate of real dollars owed is accurate--around $430MM. I think there are maybe 5 teams willing to pay that much to one player.It's no question the deal structure is much better for the Dodgers. No clue if it was the desired outcome for Ohtani too, but the structure does allow them to spend more now while he is on the team in order to win. His only financial benefit is the taxes he avoids by moving out of CA in 10 years.
I think the deferred contracts would be more popular if players were willing to do them.
I was wondering how that stipulation would have any teeth given the deferrals. He'd have to be at peak performance for that to be a serious concern for ownership.Not everyone has $50 million in endorsements each year either to be able to defer payments.
He can apparently void the contract if Friedman or ownership change.
Exactly what I was going to say. When even is the last time they MET with a Japanese posting? Legitimately can't even remember oneWell they usually don't even get a meeting with these guys so this is good.
Could also be a leverage play by his camp. Only a handful of teams are actually willing to give out big contracts anymore.
Yamamoto gets this and the Phillies get the whispers to remove the "doesn't sign Japanese guys" label.
Nah, just the Rays molting their salary as they do every 5 yearsThere's no way the Dodgers believe Margot is good enough to play every day, right? He's just walking money?
Yea. Margot was gonna get like $10m, plus a $2M option buy-out next year. Glasnow signed a super back-loaded deal because of injury so last season was like $5M and this year is $25m... The Rays are sending $4M in the trade. But still that's basically like almost $30M they will save in salary this year.Oh look, the Dodgers
Nah, just the Rays molting their salary as they do every 5 years
He's one of the wealthiest humans in the world. I believe he has alluded to not pissing off the other owners with absurd contracts though. They have spent money, just foolishly though (Scherzer and Verlander).The Mets were supposed to have these deep pockets weren't they?
Weird that this would be his stance when the Dodgers just gave out an absolutely absurd contract.He's one of the wealthiest humans in the world. I believe he has alluded to not pissing off the other owners with absurd contracts though. They have spent money, just foolishly though (Scherzer and Verlander).