cheesesteakarmor
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2009
- 2,692
- 0
Question:
Do you guys see Utley as being a future Hall of Famer?
That's a good question & to be honest I'm not really sure. The injuries & the missed games really hurt his progression the last few years.
If he ever does get in I think the wait will be a while. I don't think he would get in fairly quick.
I don't see how you can justify keeping Bonds or Clemens out of the HOF, even with steroids. Maybe it's just me, but there's no doubt in my mind that they still would've been (in Bonds case, he already seemed to have been) on a HOF track without roids.
Question:
Do you guys see Utley as being a future Hall of Famer?
Dan Lebatard of ESPN let a bunch of deadspin readers fill in his HOF ballot as his way of showing displeasure of the current voting system.
Wow, that's who it was? Seen the initial campaign, I didn't think it would be such a known name. He has to be in some hot water for that, wouldn't he?
Question:
Do you guys see Utley as being a future Hall of Famer?
Question:
Do you guys see Utley as being a future Hall of Famer?
Question:
Do you guys see Utley as being a future Hall of Famer?
Yup, Deadspin was keeping it anonymous but then Lebatard revealed on his show that it was him. He said he'll likely lose his voting privileges but he didn't really care.
I don't think so. The injuries really hurt his chances.
Better question:
Is Jimmy Rollins a future Hall of Famer?
I don't think so. The injuries really hurt his chances.
Better question:
Is Jimmy Rollins a future Hall of Famer?
I think he's got the best shot out of anyone that was a core member of this club. MVP winner, multiple GG (4) winner, multiple AS (3), Silver Slugger, and WS winner is a good chunk of hardware to start. He's also been around long enough and has played well enough offensively at a tough defensive position to rack up some numbers (and we all know how HOF voters love them some traditional numbers).
For instance, he's currently 1 HR short of 200. Once he hits that, he'll have at least 200 HR, 2k Hits, 450 2Bs, 100 3Bs, 800 RBI, 400 SBs. Only Paul Molitor (HOFer) and Johnny Damon (probable future HOFer) have at least that many in each category. And Jimmy would be the only SS to have accrued them throughout the history of baseball. If he stays healthy long enough he can certainly pad those stats a bit more and make a better case.
That said, it still might take some public massaging of those numbers to sway voters, as he didn't hit more glamorous marks of 3k hits, 1k RBI, or 300HR. I'd say it's a coin flip for Jimmy as it stands now, but I'd vote for him.
That's what I was thinking too. I didn't know the exact numbers, but I knew his stats and accolades were very comparable to other hall of famers.
Here's some fuel to my theory that he's a potential HOF coinflip.
Among SS, He currently ranks 25th per Fangraphs WAR. Of the 24 players above him are 18 HOFers. Those that aren't in the HOF are:
Jeter (will go to HOF)
A-Rod (possible HOF pending what voters decide to do w/PED users)
Alan Trammell (who I think should be in)
Vern Stephens
Bill Dahlen (last played in 1911)
Jack Glasscock (terrible name, last played in 1895)
And of the 24 next players below him in WAR there are only 4 who are in the HOF:
Hughie Jennings
Rabbit Maranville
Phil Rizzuto
John "Monte" Ward
So basically, Jimmy could be around the cutoff line for SS HOF prospects if you use WAR as the measuring stick. But much like I said in the last post, he could still play well enough to up his WAR. Of course it's tough for a guy his age to get positive chunks like he used to,
So, what then distinguishes Jimmy from the 24 guys below him, or potentially from the guys above him?