Hah - I think that's a fair question. We have a HC who doesn't specialize in offense or defense. Doesn't primarily call plays. The best answer I can give is "He's a motivator" - which has its place, but holy s*** that does not inspire confidence in me after those awful, awful games SEA and beyond. I don't know if he lost the team, but it was dysfunctional AF. Could be his fault - I dunno. But I'm OK if they give him another year if Lurie/Howie determined there were other factors that caused it.
I don't think there's an established cycle yet - but I do think they can be in danger of beginning one soon. Hopefully they snap out of it with the coaching this year overall and we can all be happy.
"Team Motivator" was Rivera's main job. So, again, ominous for you people that they're talking to him. Risking overloading the intangibles while lacking tangibles.
Saw a post today by ESPN how James Cook entered the 4th quarter with 67 rushing yards. O/u was 61.5.
Had 4 rushes in the 4th (-4, -3, 0, 1), ended the night with 61 yeards.
The post was lamenting his 4th quarter for everyone who bet the over.
It gives off extremely weird vibes when ESPN posts sh*t like that. Like, I don't care, let degenerate gamblern worry about that. It's weird when a sports news page is reporting that...
Hah - I think that's a fair question. We have a HC who doesn't specialize in offense or defense. Doesn't primarily call plays. The best answer I can give is "He's a motivator" - which has its place, but holy s*** that does not inspire confidence in me after those awful, awful games SEA and beyond. I don't know if he lost the team, but it was dysfunctional AF. Could be his fault - I dunno. But I'm OK if they give him another year if Lurie/Howie determined there were other factors that caused it.
I don't think there's an established cycle yet - but I do think they can be in danger of beginning one soon. Hopefully they snap out of it with the coaching this year overall and we can all be happy.
Steichen shouldn't have been SO GOOD that he attracted HC attention. I would say that maybe we should've kept Steichen and ditched Sirianni last year, but no team will ever do that to a coach who just came up 4pts short of a SB winThree years, three OCs, three DCs
Yup. It reminds me of cigarettesI never watch Flyers pre-game, but I'll usually watch the post-game for a bit to hear the reaction from TORTS.
There is a segment now exclusively devoted to gambling. It's very similar to those shows making pregame predictions, then revisiting them later to see who made out. But it's all based around some bet they favored earlier, and whether it hit.
I'm all for people being allowed to bet on whatever they want to, but the pushing of it is pretty gross
Kiper has Fuaga in his newest mock.Sirianni is an offensive coach. His background is WRs/QBs/OC.
I agree that it appears he didn’t do much of note to pull them out of the tailspin this year, but we’re at a point where you can say that one of the 4 teams left in the playoffs has a HC that was an OC or DC at any point in the NFL. There have never been more roads to take that can get you to where you want to go. Some are just more difficult than others because it all hinges on how you replace assistants that get poached.
Sirianni is an offensive coach. His background is WRs/QBs/OC.
I agree that it appears he didn’t do much of note to pull them out of the tailspin this year, but we’re at a point where you can say that one of the 4 teams left in the playoffs has a HC that was an OC or DC at any point in the NFL. There have never been more roads to take that can get you to where you want to go. Some are just more difficult than others because it all hinges on how you replace assistants that get poached.
Four, four, and four this time next year if the replacements are any good (or horrible tbh).Three years, three OCs, three DCs
My buddy said they should go get Brian Griese just to f*** with SF.Alright now that Brian Johnson is likely out, who do we want at OC?
Chip Kelly.Alright now that Brian Johnson is likely out, who do we want at OC?
This will end well.