Other Sports: Philadelphia Eagles (NFL): THIS IS BRAZIL (Start Of 2024 Regular Season)

May 22, 2008
36,521
112,358
The big issue with this statement being, does Pickett have strengths?

me said:
There are only two cases where the discourse around 1st round QBs broke my brain. One was the move Lamar to a different position leaking brain stuff.

The other was calling Pickett a potential safe processor archetype. If you liked him, fine. That's just normal evaluation disagreements. But he had zero success in college until he became a big time out of structure producer. There was no chance in hell he had the athleticism to do that in the NFL. Either he somehow made that work or he was DOA.

No. (Tomlin is a Warlock.)
 

Sensrule

Registered User
Aug 30, 2007
911
465
Foles worked his magic to the Super Bowl last time. If Hurts is out long-term. Pickett sure as hell ain't leading us to the promise land. Defense got all those turnovers but couldn't get the crucial stop on that last drive.

If we lose next week. Feels like it's going to be a repeat of the playoffs last year with us losing, this time at home. (Unless Washington wins the division which is slim but they've had magical moments all season.)
 

Halladay

Registered User
Feb 27, 2009
66,630
8,417
H Town
Foles worked his magic to the Super Bowl last time. If Hurts is out long-term. Pickett sure as hell ain't leading us to the promise land. Defense got all those turnovers but couldn't get the crucial stop on that last drive.

If we lose next week. Feels like it's going to be a repeat of the playoffs last year with us losing, this time at home. (Unless Washington wins the division which is slim but they've had magical moments all season.)
They will kill the Giants with Pickett or not. They are so bad. Being out over 3 weeks seems extreme seems extreme even for a concussion.
 

trostol

Learn to swim, Learn to swim
Jan 30, 2012
17,686
17,872
R'lyeh
hbywg7rquw7e1.png
 

WIP CALLER

Registered User
Aug 18, 2016
2,608
2,752
I was thinking the running game failed because Washington didnt need to worry about Barkley AND Hurts.

No defense needs to worry about Pickett keeping a handoff and running.
They don’t have to really worry about Pickett beating them over the top either so they can literally just cram as many people in the box as possible. I don’t know what Howie saw in Pickett. Back up qb’s will always have flaws, it’s the nature of the beast, but seems like a good idea to have one that is like your starter but lite and that’s not Pickett.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mkoll
May 22, 2008
36,521
112,358
I'm just surprised a) the defense was this bad and b) the running game didn't work? What is up with that?

The defense had a bunch of busted coverages. That’s the injuries and ejection because it’s communication. Remember when they couldn’t handle a Bunch formation for 5 straight years? That was communication. Plus Quinyon guessed wrong on a key play that ended up in a long TD. That’s just how it is with rookies. Essentially all of the damage was on Late Down Passing plays. Daniels is a playmaker. He made plays. This is very much not a game to cause grave concern.

It’s not just that there was no passing game making it hard on the running game. It’s that so much of what they do is designed around having a QB who’s a running threat. When you have to make that stylistic QB change on the fly, your playbook shrinks significantly. Yes, that part is on Howie to me. His plan I’m sure is to simply get the best backup he can and it makes sense. But part of the calculus is that it hurts you in games like this. His apparent strategy is trying to min-max for the 1-3 week absence rather than the fill-in game. They’ll know if Hurts isn’t going and be able to install more of what Pickett can run with a week to prep.
 

flyershockey

Registered User
Oct 10, 2006
13,665
6,820
I'm still annoyed that the hit on Hurts that was pretty late, unnecessary, and with forceable contact to the head (which caused the bounce off the ground) will largely go unnoticed by the league, but we'll continue to see one hand shoves a second after the release get flagged every week. I know declared runners are subject to different rules, but it was reminiscent of the Clowney hit on Wentz in the playoffs a couple of years ago, meaning it was clearly intended to try and injure the most important player on the other team. It was the exact same thing that happened the first time they played Washington this year. Jalen just beat the protocol last time.

Between that and all the cut blocks, Dan Quinn has them playing pretty grimy football.
 

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
34,370
72,640
The defense had a bunch of busted coverages. That’s the injuries and ejection because it’s communication. Remember when they couldn’t handle a Bunch formation for 5 straight years? That was communication. Plus Quinyon guessed wrong on a key play that ended up in a long TD. That’s just how it is with rookies. Essentially all of the damage was on Late Down Passing plays. Daniels is a playmaker. He made plays. This is very much not a game to cause grave concern.

It’s not just that there was no passing game making it hard on the running game. It’s that so much of what they do is designed around having a QB who’s a running threat. When you have to make that stylistic QB change on the fly, your playbook shrinks significantly. Yes, that part is on Howie to me. His plan I’m sure is to simply get the best backup he can and it makes sense. But part of the calculus is that it hurts you in games like this. His apparent strategy is trying to min-max for the 1-3 week absence rather than the fill-in game. They’ll know if Hurts isn’t going and be able to install more of what Pickett can run with a week to prep.
I guess if I thought for literally one more second I could have realized, simply, they couldn't run any read options. Duh

I feel like the defense played well despite some starters like Blankenship out earlier in the season but things aren't same when you can gameplan all week vs someone getting rejected and things changing on the fly.

Really though, if they could have punched it in one (or both obviously) of those times under the 10 yd line, they win this game. Or if Smith catches that ball. For the 2 of their 3 losses quite literally are because of wide open dropped passes for game breaking first downs. That's actually kind of nuts
 
  • Like
Reactions: JojoTheWhale

flyershockey

Registered User
Oct 10, 2006
13,665
6,820
It’s not just that there was no passing game making it hard on the running game. It’s that so much of what they do is designed around having a QB who’s a running threat. When you have to make that stylistic QB change on the fly, your playbook shrinks significantly. Yes, that part is on Howie to me. His plan I’m sure is to simply get the best backup he can and it makes sense. But part of the calculus is that it hurts you in games like this. His apparent strategy is trying to min-max for the 1-3 week absence rather than the fill-in game. They’ll know if Hurts isn’t going and be able to install more of what Pickett can run with a week to prep.
There's a reason Harbaugh has carried a Lamar Jackson lite as his backup since they named him the starter. You don't have an install for two QB's. You have what you're running and then a skinnier version of it for your back up, which is largely devoid of any timing routes that require practice reps. There's a reason it was slant/sluggo and digs. Those are window routes.

It's really hard to win with a back-up in the NFL (talent drop off, lack of reps, etc.). It's even harder to do it on the fly.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad