I copied and pasted this from the Flyers board.
Pretty much ho I'm looking at this.
A real great move Stevie (your the Best)
DrinkFightFlyers
Grave Before Shave
DrinkFightFlyers's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 13,315
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to DrinkFightFlyers
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKJ View Post
What did you want? They got more than any defenseman on the market so far, other than Yandle. Or are you just being (faux-)ironic contrarian since you hate the draft?
Gudas is a bottom pair defenseman. The pick is likely in the bottom five of the first round (and bottom five of the third round). The team got worse in the present, and at best it is a lateral move three years or so down the road when whomever we pick is NHL-ready. I would have liked maybe a prospect that was close to being NHL-ready or a player better than Gudas or perhaps another pick, something to that effect. Not sure exactly what I would have been happy about (i.e., which prospect, which NHLer, or which pick), but I think they could have gotten more.
This offseason people were saying they wouldn't do Coburn for Eberle, a guy that has shown he can put up 60-70+ points on a regular basis. But now a bottom pair defenseman, late first round pick, and a third rounder is ok? Yandle got more and he should have, and I'm not suggesting Coburn should have gotten a 1st/2nd/one of their best prospects/and a young RFA defenseman. But I don't think a 1st/3rd/Gudas + legit NHL prospect/other NHL roster player/other pick is some crazy amount for Coburn.
I really have never been opposed to trading Coburn unless the team was in a big playoff race or something like that, and the trade isn't terrible, it just isn't a good trade in my book. It makes the team worse now and only gives a slight chance at improvement down the line. Unless the Flyers hit an absolute home run in the draft, the best they can hope for is a guy that is as good as Coburn with that first pick. Yes, it is possible that they draft a top pairing stud defeseman, but the odds are greatly stacked against them that they will wind up with a 4-5-6 than with a 1-2-3 (or a bottom nine compared to top nine).
Trades like this should be made when you have a player that won't re-sign, or a player like Streit where he is older and having a good season that may not be replicated again. I don't think you should do this with your best/second best defenseman who is on a reasonable contract with another year left. Hell that alone should have been worth something to Tampa. I'm not saying fire Hextall or anything like that, I just think he could have gotten more, and if he no one was offering, then hold on to him.
The market for D-men has got to be heating up given the trades and the injuries that are taking place, no?
DrinkFightFlyers is offline Report Post