Probably something pretty similar. But then he was always going to get 5m+. That's what happens when you score 56 goals and 107 points in 2 years.
Bobby McBoatface always scooping up the details
Probably something pretty similar. But then he was always going to get 5m+. That's what happens when you score 56 goals and 107 points in 2 years.
Not a fan. I don't think him and Kadri are much different players. Obviously Brayden had a bigger year, but over their careers they have been the same. Kadri had a more shutdown role and unlucky start (sub 2% shooting % over the first few months) and I think they are similar offensively.
I think they overpaid him IMO.
Not a fan. I don't think him and Kadri are much different players. Obviously Brayden had a bigger year, but over their careers they have been the same. Kadri had a more shutdown role and unlucky start (sub 2% shooting % over the first few months) and I think they are similar offensively.
I think they overpaid him IMO.
Not a fan. I don't think him and Kadri are much different players. Obviously Brayden had a bigger year, but over their careers they have been the same. Kadri had a more shutdown role and unlucky start (sub 2% shooting % over the first few months) and I think they are similar offensively.
I think they overpaid him IMO.
Damn, only took until page 2 this time until the Leafs fans started mentioning Kadri. Unreal lmao
Are you serious?
Damn, only took until page 2 this time until the Leafs fans started mentioning Kadri. Unreal lmao
Tavares has a cap hit of 5.5. They're both overpaid. See what happens when we ignore context?
Explain how what I said lacks context? They are basically the same age and signed in the same off season.
Their advanced stats show Brayden is a slightly better offensive player (which reflects on the stat sheet as well) but Kadri is a much better possession, shot suppressing, and defensive player. Kadri was outscoring him up until 2 years ago.
Brayden scored 15 more points in like 7 or 8 more games. Kadri was snake bitten, and if we pretend he had normal production and played a full year, statistically he would have been outscored by 5 or 6 points.
Regardless, Kadri also played MUCH harder minutes, which explain his lack of production, compared to a more sheltered Schenn who gets the benefit of better linemates as well (Giroux and Simmonds vs Half a year of JVR and Komarov).
To pretend they aren't comparable players is laughable.
Plus Kadri plays the more important position.
Anything under 5.5 and i was gonna be happy, so shade over 5 is real good imo.
I guess real question is: this is a thread about Schenn, who gives a sweet crap about Kadri?[/QUOTE]
I agree. Who gives a crap about kadri?
Guy is a massive Leafs homer and I'd assume even the vast majority of Leafs fans wouldn't agree with him. He is either trolling or not very knowledgeable about hockey. No need for everyone to start arguing with him.
Anyways I really like this deal for the Flyers.
I guess real question is: this is a thread about Schenn, who gives a sweet crap about Kadri?
Explain how what I said lacks context? They are basically the same age and signed in the same off season.
Not a fan. I don't think him and Kadri are much different players. Obviously Brayden had a bigger year, but over their careers they have been the same. Kadri had a more shutdown role and unlucky start (sub 2% shooting % over the first few months) and I think they are similar offensively.
I think they overpaid him IMO.
While it's easy to average things out over one, two, or three years and assume that's the way the world works, it's not. Schenn's progression curve gives him more leverage than Kadri had, not to mention the obvious positional difference. Whether we like it or not (and I certainly don't), points get you paid.
To be sure, the Kadri contract is a very good one. It just doesn't mean Schenn is overpaid. One contract is NEVER going to set market value. The general consensus was roughly 5-5.25 on where Schenn would come in. He got paid fairly. If he's the player he was post 1/1, it could actually turn out to be a steal. If he reverts to a 50 pt PP specialist wing, it's still within the acceptable range.
Brayden is a more complete hockey player in my opinion than Kadri.
I'd be interested in the obvious positional difference compared to Kadri... One is a W, the other a C?