Value of: Petr Mrazek retained @ 50%

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,877
5,711
Trading away Mrazek at this point, for Chicago, would be damning their young players to an even more miserable year than they're already experiencing.

At some point, you have to show that you're willing to try and win games. What message would it send to Bedard and co if they just announce that they want the team to lose every game this season?
 

Hattrick Kane

Registered User
Oct 8, 2018
9,866
14,607
Trading away Mrazek at this point, for Chicago, would be damning their young players to an even more miserable year than they're already experiencing.

At some point, you have to show that you're willing to try and win games. What message would it send to Bedard and co if they just announce that they want the team to lose every game this season?
Well the coach is actively sabotaging the team and management seems to not care so yeah sure trade Mrazek while he’s hot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackhawkswincup

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,487
24,737
He has a stigma for some injury riddled years but he's been absolutely solid for awhile now. Without googling I'm willing to be he's top 5 in shots against and minutes played the last 2 seasons.

He'd be a great TDL acquisition OR a great trade him and get a nice return for Chicago. Eg. could they get a younger player that will align better with their future (which looks bright). Mrazek is like Larkin.. when the team gets good he'll be past his window.

My offer is Pickard + Jeff Skinner to the Hawks for him and I imagine a sweetener is needed. 2nd rounder?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeteranPresence

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,765
17,565
San Diego
Value might be tough since most teams aren't going to look at Mrazek as their starter. Most teams don't pay a ton to upgrade their backup spots. Montreal retained 50% on Jake Allen (3.85 mil vs Mrazek making 4.25 mil) and got a conditional 3rd round pick that could get bumped up to a 2nd based on games played. It seemed fairly clear from the onset that the Devils were tabbing Allen as the backup for the upcoming season.

Ballpark goalie depth charts by division:

ANA: Gibson - Dostal
CGY: Wolf - Vladar
EDM: Skinner - Pickard
LAK: Kuemper - Rittich
SEA: Daccord - Grubauer
SJS: Blackwood - Vanecek - Askarov
VAN: Demko (IR) - Lankinen - Silovs
VGK: Hill - Samsonov

We'll see if Edmonton eyes a move. Blackwood may be a more attractive option than Mrazek, so you might not see a team make a move on Mrazek before Blackwood is traded. And then there's the perpetual John Gibson watch.

ARZ: Ingram - Vejmelka
CHI: Mrazek - Brossoit (IR) - Soderblom
COL: Georgiev - Annunen
DAL: Oettinger - DeSmith
MIN: Gustavsson - Fleury
NSH: Saros - Wedgewood
STL: Binnington - Hofer
WPG: Hellebucyk - Comrie - Kahkonen

Colorado seems like the most likely buyer.

BOS: Swayman - Korpisalo
BUF: Luukkonen - Reimer - Levi
DET: Talbot - Lyon - Husso
FLO: Bobrovsky - Knight
MON: Montembeault - Primeau
OTT: Ullmark - Forsberg
TBL: Vasilevskiy - Johansson
TOR: Woll - Stolarz - Hildeby

Tampa could probably use a backup upgrade, but Mrazek retained is probably still more expensive than what they'd want.

CAR: Andersen (IR) - Kochetkov - Martin
CLB: Merzlikins - Tarasov
NJD: Markstrom - Allen
NYI: Sorokin - Varlamov
NYR: Shesterkin - Quick
PHI: Ersson - Fedotov
PIT: Jarry - Nedeljkovic
WSH: Lindgren - Thompson

Carolina probably has enough of a cushion to wait out Andersen's injury but we'll see how that goes. Barring other injuries, not sure there'll be any buyers in the Metro.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,241
14,761
Kansas City, MO
Underrated these last few years. I think he's a much better option than guys like Blackwood who have yet to even put together two years of consistent starting goalie play in their entire career - or guys like Gibson who have a higher cap hit and more recent questions.

If the Hawks were to retain - I think he becomes pretty damn valuable. A two-year deal (ie, two Cup runs) is a perfect contract length. And he's simply been a very good starter since day one in Chicago.

He's been my pick for the Avs for a while. No questions about ability or current play as a locked-in starter. Get him for two runs at the apple. No long-term commitment. Perfect.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,252
110,619
Tarnation
He has a stigma for some injury riddled years but he's been absolutely solid for awhile now. Without googling I'm willing to be he's top 5 in shots against and minutes played the last 2 seasons.

He'd be a great TDL acquisition OR a great trade him and get a nice return for Chicago. Eg. could they get a younger player that will align better with their future (which looks bright). Mrazek is like Larkin.. when the team gets good he'll be past his window.

My offer is Pickard + Jeff Skinner to the Hawks for him and I imagine a sweetener is needed. 2nd rounder?

Very close - 5th in shots faced and 9th in minutes since the start of last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,252
110,619
Tarnation
It seems like there are two clear opportunities for teams to try him as their goalie between Colorado and Edmonton. Making a deal work though, I would imagine some cap would have to come back and then what is it that he is valued at? Maybe a second? Or maybe put playoff series wins into a contingent escalation where the pick goes up each round after the 2nd?
 

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,508
33,681
Canes reunion could make sense but they won't do anything until there is more clarity on Freddie's recovery and closer to deadline. If he returns at full health well before the deadline as projected, the Canes won't make any moves in net. If there are setbacks or something else comes up with him (can never count it out with Freddie), then I think a play for Mrazek becomes a lot more likely if he's still available.
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,487
24,737
Canes reunion could make sense but they won't do anything until there is more clarity on Freddie's recovery and closer to deadline. If he returns at full health well before the deadline as projected, the Canes won't make any moves in net. If there are setbacks or something else comes up with him (can never count it out with Freddie), then I think a play for Mrazek becomes a lot more likely if he's still available.
I would probably have a heart attack if Mrazek returned to the Canes and was the starter in the playoffs. I'd have to buy a Necas Canes jersey!
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
156,252
110,619
Tarnation
Canes reunion could make sense but they won't do anything until there is more clarity on Freddie's recovery and closer to deadline. If he returns at full health well before the deadline as projected, the Canes won't make any moves in net. If there are setbacks or something else comes up with him (can never count it out with Freddie), then I think a play for Mrazek becomes a lot more likely if he's still available.

As a casual observer, it seems like Freddie is always a hairsbreadth away from being back on the IR.
 

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,769
13,785
Don't want to trade him. He probably returns a 2nd at best and we have had plenty of those. It's not worth torching our stability as our young D is getting better and better. We're already a bottom 5 (at best) team with Mrazek so we get nothing from dealing him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BKarchitect

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,241
14,761
Kansas City, MO
Don't want to trade him. He probably returns a 2nd at best and we have had plenty of those. It's not worth torching our stability as our young D is getting better and better. We're already a bottom 5 (at best) team with Mrazek so we get nothing from dealing him.

Sensible. The Hawks need stability more than more 2nd round picks.

Frankly at full retention (which makes him a bargain and a guy a lot of teams could afford), I think he’d fetch a late 1st. Allen with two springs left on his contract got a 3rd at the top of that round that could become a 2nd (unlikely though). That’s for a guy who was clearly a veteran backup and nothing more. Mrazek is light years better. Kuemper at age 31/32 got a late 1st and Timmins as a pure one run rental, as a veteran putting up good stats constantly behind a crap team (at the time).

But yeah, doesn’t seem removing him from the Hawks is going to help in the development of their younger guys or team development vision.
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,487
24,737
Sensible. The Hawks need stability more than more 2nd round picks.

Frankly at full retention (which makes him a bargain and a guy a lot of teams could afford), I think he’d fetch a late 1st. Allen with two springs left on his contract got a 3rd at the top of that round that could become a 2nd (unlikely though). That’s for a guy who was clearly a veteran backup and nothing more. Mrazek is light years better.

But yeah, doesn’t seem removing him from the Hawks is going to help in the development of their younger guys or team development vision.
So that's my argument.

Hawk's are finishing 5th with or without Mrazek.

Get something of value for the future because this season is a tank (on purpose).

You trade him.. get a top 5 pick and a good young player in return (not a 2nd)

vs

You don't trade him... get a top 5 pick.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,241
14,761
Kansas City, MO
So that's my argument.

Hawk's are finishing 5th with or without Mrazek.

Get something of value for the future because this season is a tank (on purpose).

You trade him.. get a top 5 pick and a good young player in return (not a 2nd)

vs

You don't trade him... get a top 5 pick.

Yeah I just think there’s a lot more involved into trying to turn around a losing culture than simple maths. Mrazek keeps the Hawks pretty competitive even if they come out on the losing side more often and he’s also going to be there next year.

I don’t think he’s untouchable but I get why Hawks fans aren’t ready to just liquidate him into “assets” or more young players at first offer…
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
467
785
If y'all are going to keep Mrazek can Edmonton trade for Soderblom please? No retention needed at that cap hit and he has similar underlying numbers.
 

Space umpire

Registered User
Nov 15, 2018
3,249
2,637
Cocoa Beach, Florida
He has a stigma for some injury riddled years but he's been absolutely solid for awhile now. Without googling I'm willing to be he's top 5 in shots against and minutes played the last 2 seasons.

He'd be a great TDL acquisition OR a great trade him and get a nice return for Chicago. Eg. could they get a younger player that will align better with their future (which looks bright). Mrazek is like Larkin.. when the team gets good he'll be past his window.

My offer is Pickard + Jeff Skinner to the Hawks for him and I imagine a sweetener is needed. 2nd rounder?
Mrazek is worth a 2nd. Not what are you adding so Chicago takes 2 cap dumps?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad