- Jun 13, 2010
- 42,898
- 21,783
The 1st we were contractually obligated to give to San Jose for the EK trade?I give him a D+ for his usual summer dumpster diving antics.
He should’ve held on to our 1st.
Come on dude.
The 1st we were contractually obligated to give to San Jose for the EK trade?I give him a D+ for his usual summer dumpster diving antics.
He should’ve held on to our 1st.
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think that trade has worked out very well for us. I’d much rather have the 1st round pick.The 1st we were contractually obligated to give to San Jose for the EK trade?
Come on dude.
Trying to be less negative. I hope the Rangers suck but I wish the player well. Trying to get some good KarmaWhy?
I don't. Screw the rangers
Agreed top 4 D can be hard to find especially with how Petts played for us. I think if we are out of the playoff picture though I agree with most to trade him. He could be worth quite a bit.I am once again saying Pettersson is the type of guy you extend if you want to be competitive sometime in the next few years
Forward lines as I see them today:
McGroarty-Crosby-Glass (see what the kids have)
Bunting-Malkin-Rust (speed to help Geno)
DOC-Hayes-Rakell (third line with size/skill, DOC helps with speed)
Lizotte-Eller-camp battle (let Eller babysit)
with realistic winner of 'camp battle' spot being one of Acciari, Puustinen, Beauvillier, Puljujarvi, Poulin, Ponomarev, Bemstrom
This would be part of last year's ratings. Which at the time myself was pumped till Karlsson got Sulleyd. We also got rid of dead meat on the roster.I give him a D+ for his usual summer dumpster diving antics.
He should’ve held on to our 1st.
The 1st we were contractually obligated to give to San Jose for the EK trade?
Come on dude.
Just adding the quotes. Again the EK 1st we gave up is from last year.Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think that trade has worked out very well for us. I’d much rather have the 1st round pick.
There’s a chance EK can prove me wrong this upcoming season as he acclimates, but I’m not going to hold my breath.
It also allowed us to add a younger/cheaper upgrade in Ned over CDS. If people wanna argue we should have kept Matheson and Marino, therefore never getting EK or Graves, thats fair. But given what we had at the time, I do the EK trade(s) 100/100.Hindsight Is 20/20 we got EK for a 1st and cap dumps.
Edit: I suppose we traded a 2nd to get rid of Petry
So 1st + 2nd + cap dumps for Karlsson + San Jose 3rd
I just don't agree as I think folks overrate picks, you immediately have to replace him if you trade him as they have little to nothing coming at LDIMO they wont be competitive during the years of an extension. I feel like the assets he would return are more valuable than his play over the next few years.
The EK trade was fine.
If Pettersson won't resign at a recent figure, sure trade himTrying to be less negative. I hope the Rangers suck but I wish the player well. Trying to get some good Karma
Agreed top 4 D can be hard to find especially with how Petts played for us. I think if we are out of the playoff picture though I agree with most to trade him. He could be worth quite a bit.
This would be part of last year's ratings. Which at the time myself was pumped till Karlsson got Sulleyd. We also got rid of dead meat on the roster.
Just adding the quotes. Again the EK 1st we gave up is from last year.
Hindsight Is 20/20 we got EK for a 1st and cap dumps.
Edit: I suppose we traded a 2nd to get rid of Petry
So 1st + 2nd + cap dumps for Karlsson + San Jose 3rd
Don't see them as doing that at allI mean I loved it at the time but it's kind of pointless and stupid NOW if the team is just gonna toss it's hands up after one crack at it under this "GM" and give up.
If Pettersson won't resign at a recent figure, sure trade him
But he seems to like Pittsburgh enough I think something fair could get done
Don't see them as doing that at all
Not exactly adding guys that are UFA after this year, pretty obviously trying to build up for future runs through the decline of the stars with RFA types
Twas refreshing to see this again.One of the hundreds of reasons you want Sid around with young developing players
When we look back at it it was fine, but now we knew all along the problem was bigger than just adding EK and thinking we were good enough to compete again.The EK trade was fine.
No, Hayes is <35, can still play and/or turn it around. Think we need to actually see him play in black and gold before calling him a bum, might be an upgrade over some of the junk they put out last year. One man's trash is another man's treasureAny team that is taking on bums like Hayes because he comes with some half-shit second round pick is pretty clearly giving up. That's (former) Coyotes kinda stuff.
No, Hayes is <35, can still play and/or turn it around. Think we need to actually see him play in black and gold before calling him a bum, might be an upgrade over some of the junk they put out last year. One man's trash is another man's treasure
Taking on guys that are legitimately done playing is Coyotes stuff
Think you're overly cynical on Hayes but it is your right, he scored 50 points in 70 games a season ago despite his coach hating him and is 32It seems pretty obvious to me that the team is "rebuilding on the fly" which is just code for "we don't want to try anymore but we also want to sell tickets." There are legitimate reasons for it but I don't have to like it.
Oh... we'll wait until we see Hayes actually play, alright. Get a nice eyeful. We're all gonna love what he brings, I'm sure. We've really missed that Jack Johnson kinda "really should be in the ECHL" kinda energy around this team so it'll be nice to get some of that back.
I don't see the point in moving Mp before the season unless you're completely throwing in the towel on trying to win.
I think you at least give the roster a chance to not suck and then if they still do you ship him out by the TDL or sooner depending on how bad the suckage is.
I'm not worried about his value tanking by holding onto him. He's not that old and he's not injury prone. And he has a good body of work. Keeping him a bit longer won't tank his trade value.
Whether Hayes sucks or not, they've pretty clearly given up. They haven't won a playoff series in 6 years, made the playoffs in 2, and their big changes were to get rid of their 40 goal winger, cycle out some of the bottom 6...again, and a new assistant coach....again.
If they were still serious, Sullivan would have been long gone by now. They would have had a better answer for LW1, too. Maybe they lucked into something with McGroarty, but until a few days ago, they were going to roll into the season with DOC as a top line winger
When we look back at it it was fine, but now we knew all along the problem was bigger than just adding EK and thinking we were good enough to compete again.
We had to move out bad contracts in the process and to make things worse Granlund who we hated for obvious reasons here for his terrible play when acquired went on to have a 60 pts season in San Jose!
Now we will be stuck with EK
I honestly admire your optimism, but I feel like Hayes put up 54 points on the 2022 Flyers the same way Granlund put up 60 on the Sharks this year. Somebody had to.Think you're overly cynical on Hayes but it is your right, he scored 50 points in 70 games a season ago despite his coach hating him and is 32
I buy the rebuild on the fly because I think any team with Crosby is capable of being competitive with a few moves, not sure how a Pens fan could feel differently at this point
Something something something we believe we can still contend, etc.If they keep Marcus Pettersson even if they are in the playoffs, this franchise's direction is even more confusing.
I honestly admire your optimism, but I feel like Hayes put up 54 points on the 2022 Flyers the same way Granlund put up 60 on the Sharks this year. Somebody had to.
As for MP, this is likely his last shot at a long term deal. I'd love to sign him for 2-3 years at 5.5 per, but I have to think he gets something close to 6/36 from someone. That is a deal Id rather not be locked into, which is why I would take a couple lottery tickets for him at the TDL if we arent firmly looking to make the playoffs, again. I just dont think he moves the needle in terms of the team being competitive, as much as I love having him on the team.
Well, I think Dubas is executing on their vision, so whatever they want to pay him for it, I couldn't care less.Exactly. I'm not sure how this is even a debate.
I mean... I think it sucks and while Crosby is around and still good pretty insulting. They didn't have to pay Kyle Dubas 7M dollars to do THIS job. But it's definitely where they are no doubt.