Gurglesons
Registered User
I was thinking the deal would be Kapanen, 2nd and a prospect outside of Poulin, Pickering and POJ. Maybe Hallander lol.
He's a UFA.
So? They want to make playoffs. They are the lowest scoring team in the league. he had 15 more goals than kap last year. They aren't trading away goals.
Okay. They are having an awful start and could easily be out of the playoffs in a few weeks.
The blues just won a cup coming from like last place in Jan. They aren't trading away players in Nov.
Also why are we giving up 2nd + Hallander on top of Kap for a UFA who you are buying high on. Hallander is having a great start in the AHL and just turned 22. I just don't think this deal makes sense for either team.
Barbashev can play C. That's why I would add it on top.
I can deal with Zucker but if they re-sign Dumo I'm gonna be at least a little mad. I almost typed furious but after b2b Cups not so long ago I don't know if I have it in me yet to go full Ragamuffin Gunner on this team.Why? Because it's more fun to dream about cool new players than to stare idly at the wall, half asleep, as the team inevitably re-signs Jason Zucker and Brian Dumoulin to retirement deals.
Embrace the apathy. You'll be free of the burden of expectation and frustration, and it'll just be hockey.I can deal with Zucker but if they re-sign Dumo I'm gonna be at least a little mad. I almost typed furious but after b2b Cups not so long ago I don't know if I have it in me yet to go full Ragamuffin Gunner on this team.
Then I would trade TB not Kap. Sullivan has his centers set. good luck convincing him to play him above carter or TB.
Lol I've tried but I still get a little angry or at least depressed about losses.Embrace the apathy. You'll be free of the burden of expectation and frustration, and it'll just be hockey.
Crazy year for the Hawks post cup. They got Daley for Sharp who they couldn't keep for cap reasons. Daley is a flop so they immediately send him out for Scuderi. Sharp to Daley to Scuderi. Then they swapped Scuderi to LA for Ehrhoff who was no better....though I mean... to Chicago's credit they didn't make a trade, find out the player just isn't working on the team and then proceed to bury their head in the sand for years. They moved on.
My personal favorite on that front was the Ryan Wilson masterpiece over at HockeyBuzz titled "Don't fall for Chicago's Fools Gold" where he proceeded to absolutely eviscerate Daley based solely on adv stats that he didn't even understand at the time. Hilarious then, hilarious now.My personal favorite was the one poster here who hated Scuderi so much, it was on the hairguy-Malkin level, who spent a year and a half complaining that Scuderi was here and couldn't be moved. Adn then when the trade happened, he was even more mad that it was for Daley and with retention! We didn't get rid of him the right way, you see.
They would not. That would require one or more of Sid, Malkin, Carter to pick up the slack as 4C. I would much rather run 12-6 over 11-7.You wonder if this team wouldn't benefit from doing 7 D to spread out/reduce Dumo's minutes. Would also allow you to experiment who could be a long term Letang partner
I don't think this team sucks. They played some disjointed hockey on a road trip across the continent that ended up being 4 out of the 9 games they've played so far. It seems way worse because it's like half the season to this point. I got curious so I looked yesterday; the team loses 3 or 4 straight multiple times a year for the past several years at least. It's just that people don't get so upset about it when it's happening 50 games in as opposed to 5 games in. A four game losing streak doesn't solidify the team's identity any more than the 4-0-1 before it, imo.Lol I've tried but I still get a little angry or at least depressed about losses.
I will be fine when the expectation is that we suck. But it's difficult to suck when you expect not to. Being a tank team rules and I will embrace it and religiously follow the draft when that time comes.
Until then I will daydream about one more cup baby. And get annoyed when against all odds our team of 35 year olds fails to get one
Yeah I don't think we suck either. We suck right now, but I don't think that will last the whole year. If it does, then the rebuild will be starting earlier than any of us expected. You really never know when it comes to being an old team though. Sooner or later age will hit us hard enough to make us be bad and it will feel pretty sudden I imagine. Hopefully this year is not that year.I don't think this team sucks. They played some disjointed hockey on a road trip across the continent that ended up being 4 out of the 9 games they've played so far. It seems way worse because it's like half the season to this point. I got curious so I looked yesterday; the team loses 3 or 4 straight multiple times a year for the past several years at least. It's just that people don't get so upset about it when it's happening 50 games in as opposed to 5 games in. A four game losing streak doesn't solidify the team's identity any more than the 4-0-1 before it, imo.
They'll be fine. They'll make the playoffs. They'll go on some 9 game winning streak in like, February and everybody will be screaming "Shades of '16! This is it!" Then they'll meet like, the Bruins in the 1st round and be golfing after 6 games.
I don't think this team will start the rebuild after missing the playoffs once, to be fair. I think this team's pretty locked in until Sid's contract is up and then he'll decide what happens next. I know he said he wants to play for like three more years after his deal is up, but a whole lot can change between now and then. If this team's limping its way into the playoffs only to be outed in the 1st round annually, or missing entirely, I'm not sure he's gonna be stoked to go through the rigors of more NHL hockey. Particularly as Sid, a dude who people target and try to beat the shit out of every shift, every night.Yeah I don't think we suck either. We suck right now, but I don't think that will last the whole year. If it does, then the rebuild will be starting earlier than any of us expected. You really never know when it comes to being an old team though. Sooner or later age will hit us hard enough to make us be bad and it will feel pretty sudden I imagine. Hopefully this year is not that year.
I think we might even win a playoff round depending on matchup/health.
I don't see another cup in this core though but I'd love to be wrong.
That's true. They probably won't kick off a full rebuild even if they do suck badly and miss the playoffs this year.I don't think this team will start the rebuild after missing the playoffs once, to be fair. I think this team's pretty locked in until Sid's contract is up and then he'll decide what happens next. I know he said he wants to play for like three more years after his deal is up, but a whole lot can change between now and then. If this team's limping its way into the playoffs only to be outed in the 1st round annually, or missing entirely, I'm not sure he's gonna be stoked to go through the rigors of more NHL hockey. Particularly as Sid, a dude who people target and try to beat the shit out of every shift, every night.
We'll see, though.
Rebuild on the fly, or retool, or whatever name people want to throw on the whole "cut corners and try to cheese your way back to success instead of building from the ground up" thing--just ain't gonna work, imo. Pittsburgh's not gonna draw guys in as a living destination like an LA or NYC would. The team's chock full of old dudes in the extreme twilight of their careers, so it's only down from here. They have a ton of guys locked up long-term, so there's not a cap situation where you can see the Penguins throwing like $14 million AAV to snag Auston Matthews in FA and build around him or something.That's true. They probably won't kick off a full rebuild even if they do suck badly and miss the playoffs this year.
A re-tool with an attempt to try and make it again next year would seem more likely in that scenario. Trouble is, if this team ever becomes bad to the point they don't even make the playoffs, how the f do you retool? You're not trading any of the big three or Jake and many other players are old (Petry etc) so good luck rebuilding the team on the fly.
I don't think we'll have to worry about that just yet though. If we do miss the playoffs (and it seems unlikely) I think it will be by a narrow margin at worst.
But like you said, we'll see. If we're out of a spot by the end of November, I believe that's usually the cut off date for being potentially screwed as something like 80% of the teams in a playoff spot by the end of Nov usually make it.
It's just, even if they did pull a 180 and start cutting bait with tenured names and shit. I don't know that anybody that hits UFA is really super worth chasing, and building around. Really, really good players don't usually end up in FA anymore. They're either locked up by their teams or dealt, then locked up where they end up via trade.If the Penguins are willing to actually make some tough decisions re: guys on expiring contracts they could potentially have a bonanza of cap space to work with to reshape the team. I don't know if it would actually work enough to flip them back to "hey these guys could make some noise" status but it's the only idea I've got if coaching is off limits.
But I can't help but lean BFD's way. They'll probably do the safe, predictable thing and just extend most of their FAs and hope that things will work themselves out for real this time, guys.
Barbashev can also play wing. He brings a lot of what we want to the third line. Blues fans seem good with the deal too.
It's just, even if they did pull a 180 and start cutting bait with tenured names and shit. I don't know that anybody that hits UFA is really super worth chasing, and building around. Really, really good players don't usually end up in FA anymore. They're either locked up by their teams or dealt, then locked up where they end up via trade.
Of the 2023 UFA list; f*** Kane, f*** Toews. ROR is 32 and probably stays in StL. Tarasenko is 31 and isn't worth throwing huge money at. Klingberg signed a 1-year deal to try and prove he's worth a huge payday and isn't really excelling in Anaheim. Pasta is gonna get a bonkers deal if he hits FA. Larkin's interesting, but as a C, I don't think he really fits the Penguins unless they wanna move Sid or Geno over, and that's assuming he's not just re-signed in Detroit. List goes on.
Either it's a buncha old options, bad options, younger guys who stand to make absolutely ludicrous fortunes if they hit the market.
Ehhh I would rather keep hallander and actually give him a shot on the 4th line. I still like him as a prospect. He seems like he has been around forever but this is only his second pro season.
I also don't want to trade a second for what is almost a lateral move. Barbashev has one good season above 26 pts. Kap hasn't been bad either. Carter was much more of a drag on that line than him. I am excited to see DOC in there with him tonight. He is more polished than Poulin.
I think you'd be more hoping they poach players ala Marino, Bjorkstrand, Patches this year from cap strapped teams versus making trades.
You are acquiring Barbashev for what he does away from the puck in addition to being at worst Kapanen production wise.
It's just, even if they did pull a 180 and start cutting bait with tenured names and shit. I don't know that anybody that hits UFA is really super worth chasing, and building around. Really, really good players don't usually end up in FA anymore. They're either locked up by their teams or dealt, then locked up where they end up via trade.
Of the 2023 UFA list; f*** Kane, f*** Toews. ROR is 32 and probably stays in StL. Tarasenko is 31 and isn't worth throwing huge money at. Klingberg signed a 1-year deal to try and prove he's worth a huge payday and isn't really excelling in Anaheim. Pasta is gonna get a bonkers deal if he hits FA. Larkin's interesting, but as a C, I don't think he really fits the Penguins unless they wanna move Sid or Geno over, and that's assuming he's not just re-signed in Detroit. List goes on.
Either it's a buncha old options, bad options, younger guys who stand to make absolutely ludicrous fortunes if they hit the market.