I am not touching Campbell with a ten foot barge pole. All the physical talent, none of the mental resiliency needed to shrug off mistakes which is the biggest talent needed.
Hey JR is that you secretly working for the leafs
Hey JR is that you secretly working for the leafs
I’d take Reaves over Granlund.
Leafs are getting everyone according to every tweet in the history of the universe. Must be nice to never have a cap.
Obviously wouldn't have a problem with that, but I'll believe it when I see it. This is his last significant pro deal.Zuckers coming back on the cheap, calling it and will be happy with it.
Heard from my dogs friend that was a cat that retweeted his friend the monkey Crosby is going to Toronto for future considerations.Leafs Entering the Karlsson Sweeps “BIG Time.” (E4)
Just talked to a source who informed me the Leafs may be “ hours away from their biggest and most daring trade since Wendel Clark”… Stay tuned…
Source: Eklund
Discuss this Rumor
So could literally anyone the Penguins draft at #14.
That trade would be swapping a top 18 year old prospect for a top 21 year old prospect.
Yeah, if we're talking risk factor, trading 14 for Askarov would reduce it a whole ton. Ditto the timeline to the pick being involved.
Of course there's how involved. Is he going to be more than just a cheap 1B the next couple of years?
I think usually any chance you can trade your pick for a 21 year old who was taken higher and is doing well, you do. Given our timeline, I'd want to feel very sure he was ascending and would be meaningfully involved when I could just take a high scorer and use him as trade bait.
Yeah I totally understand wanting to trade #14 for win-now help, but using it to draft someone instead of taking Askarov is a mind boggling decision.
Eh, not to me. The player you take with 14OA should be a trade asset in a year. What Askarov is in a year seems a little unclear.
So could literally anyone the Penguins draft at #14.
That trade would be swapping a top 18 year old prospect for a top 21 year old prospect.
Obviously wouldn't have a problem with that, but I'll believe it when I see it. This is his last significant pro deal.
I think you should just trade #14 over trying to make a gamble like that on trading whoever you take at #14 a year later.
He's made money 35+ million so I don't think it's as big as a issue as many think. Of course though people always want more.
There weren't many places he was willing to go to in the first place before coming here.
I don't see him playing that much longer.
Just spit balling but I think it's definitely possible
i am not advocating for Campbell at all, but given that dubas took a swing on both samsonov and Murray Campbell seems like a guy he would look at And I’ve been preparing myself for the possibility.
Campbell spent two years under Toronto’s media pressure and played well
kings years combined 57 gms, 20-24 .918 2.51
toronto year combined 77 gms 51-14 .916 2.5
1 year in ed 36 gms 21-9 .888 3.41
i mean it is possible that the dumpster file that is Edmonton was the problem. Both his la numbers and Toronto numbers were good.
It's not just about money, it's about commitment. If he signs a 2 year deal and ends up regressing, he's out of the NHL after 2 years. Getting more term locks him into being able to at least play professional hockey, unless a team wants to buy him out.
And I could see him wanting to not play hockey for more than 2 years and give it 1 last run with this team just the same as Crosby/Malkin/Letang
Probably because the out of conference team made Vegas the best offer& once again Reilly Smith was traded out of Conference !! Geeee Wally that seems to happens a lot huh?
Wrong ! look at all trades that have happenedProbably because the out of conference team made Vegas the best offer