Pittsburgh1776
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2010
- 5,274
- 4,638
lol... spending significant money on goaltenders is dumb
We don't need Jarry to be awesome. We just need basic saves.
lol... spending significant money on goaltenders is dumb
I'm one of Sully's biggest critics, but to be honest in Game 1 the only big issue was #1. No clue going forward, but for today Jarry's performance was the single biggest reason we got a loss.
Even with Jarry sabotaging things, if any one (or more *gasp*) of Jake, Rust or McCann show up in any positive fashion, we probably still eek out a win.
Those three are quickly becoming serious playoff problems.
Sure I can dig that.
But spending much more than they already are on goaltenders IS dumb. And doesn't work. And hasn't worked. But I'm game for saying perhaps Jarry is the WRONG goaltender.
Hey anyone noticed how many STRETCH PASSES there are this year?
You are a clown, welcome to the ignore list. You're the fourth one today.
You're both right, imo. This team can't ever pay someone in net huge dollars, but they gotta do a hell of a lot better than what Murray and now Jarry have been in recent years.
We're gonna be the next Flyers aren't we? Constantly chasing that goalie to round out the team in order to make a run.
No, I think there is a healthy amount to be spending in net. Paying someone like Bishop $5 million a year is a great use of cap. You get a reliable starter that at minimum won't kill you in the playoffs.
You don't need Price, but you need better than the new flavor of the month that had a few hot months in the regular season. You should be targeting a guy who can give you what 2016 Murray did with consistency, and I think you can get that for the $5-$6 million range.
When you're giving up goals on unscreened shots from above the circle in the NHL, those are bad goals.I don't think the goals Jarry gave up were bad per se. However, all four goals looked the same: high glove. I'm worried because he's probably been "found out" and you see what happens when young goalies get found out (Murray, Binnington, etc)
Bishop is definitely an odd ass choice given his injuries.
What's funny about the Caps is that I actually don't think Holtby falls in that category. Outside of his 2017 Penguins series, he was consistently elite in the playoffs. It's just the rest of the team around him completely imploded.
I don't know that the 2018-2020 Penguins would have accomplished much more in the playoffs with someone like 2016 Holtby, but I do know that the Penguins are 3-14 in their last 3 series in the playoffs with the goaltending they have had.
I think there's a difference between saying not everyone's gonna show up and having three of your top-6 wingers continue to be no-shows in the playoffs.yeah but not everyone is going to show or play well on a team...Barzal was MIA for example whereas Palmieri showed...we had some players show and others not, just like the Isles...the aggressiveness of our system means mistakes are going to be made...we’re more reliant on good goaltending than the Isles
I mean, ask Vegas how paying for goaltending is working out for them. Lehner missed most of the season after surgery and a concussion, and MAF put up a Vezina-calibre season in his absence. I know they wanted to shed cap, because $12M on goaltending is admittedly ridiculous, but at least they've gotten a lot of value out of that money. Even with a fantastic 2021 season under his belt, I fully expect MAF to be back on the block for Vegas in the off-season because $12M is still a ridiculous number (also looking at you, Montreal).No, I think there is a healthy amount to be spending in net. Paying someone like Bishop $5 million a year is a great use of cap. You get a reliable starter that at minimum won't kill you in the playoffs.
You don't need Price, but you need better than the new flavor of the month that had a few hot months in the regular season. You should be targeting a guy who can give you what 2016 Murray did with consistency, and I think you can get that for the $5-$6 million range.
No, I think there is a healthy amount to be spending in net. Paying someone like Bishop $5 million a year is a great use of cap. You get a reliable starter that at minimum won't kill you in the playoffs.
You don't need Price, but you need better than the new flavor of the month that had a few hot months in the regular season. You should be targeting a guy who can give you what 2016 Murray did with consistency, and I think you can get that for the $5-$6 million range.
I mean, ask Vegas how paying for goaltending is working out for them. Lehner missed most of the season after surgery and a concussion, and MAF put up a Vezina-calibre season in his absence. I know they wanted to shed cap, because $12M on goaltending is admittedly ridiculous, but at least they've gotten a lot of value out of that money.
Sadly, these wasted electrons and photons can never be replaced.Isles own Pens. History has proven that.
Dude, I did. Your answer implied that price wasn’t an issue because “goalies are a crapshoot”. You asked a question and I replied w a list. Then you suddenly started caring about price.Maybe read what I was replying to before accusing me of moving goalposts huh?
I think there's a difference between saying not everyone's gonna show up and having three of your top-6 wingers continue to be no-shows in the playoffs.
Barzal got banged up midway through the game too. He had some real dangerous shifts before something happened, but they showed him laboring off the ice and hobbling to the lockerroom for a bit before coming back.
I feel like our team can get past teams that aren't overly defensive like NYI, or overly punishing like BOS. I think we take a series against your Torontos, your Washingtons, your Minnesotas easily. but the Isles are a tough outHonestly if we struggle this badly with a not very good Islanders team that has played poorly down the stretch, then we have no shot against the better teams anyway. Might as well rip the bandaid off quickly and go out in the first round. I am not interested watching watching more crap like we watched today.
Eh. It's not a significant enough amount of money apart from what I'm talking about so I won't quibble. I just don't see this team's issues as goaltending-related. Rather down the list TBH. Though of course games like this aren't encouraging in that regard.