It would be on brand to get saad this late in the game
Sure man, like, anything is cool at this pointI’d be fine sending out like Acciari for Saad and then flipping him next deadline.
We desperately need a top six LW.
Hometown kidNever understood the fascination with Saad.
He has four goals on the year and a 4.5 mil cap hit for this year and next. That would make no sense.Hometown kid
Played with an edge
Was always a penguin killer
Helps the tank, eh... Eh.. Buddy...He has four goals on the year and a 4.5 mil cap hit for this year and next. That would make no sense.
No, because his cap hit would prohibit our ability to take on salary and accrue picks or prospects.Helps the tank, eh... Eh.. Buddy...
We have 3.3 mil in cap space. Again why?That's assuming he doesn't come with a draft pick for his terrible cap hit
We got a 2nd for 2 years of Hayes' $3.75. You'll get at least that for Saad. Can't split that space and do better. So what better use of that space do you propose?We have 3.3 mil in cap space. Again why?
Retain on a guy like Petts and maximize the return on our biggest fish at the trade deadline.We got a 2nd for 2 years of Hayes' $3.75. You'll get at least that for Saad. Can't split that space and do better. So what better use of that space do you propose?
The fascination I think mainly comes from fans that were around in that draft and were paying attention to our draft position and Saad being on the board. But at the time we still had Shero and company with their “all defenseman belong to us” mentality. And those fans, I was one of them, wanted to see the local kid drafted with at least one of our 1st rounders that year. Now take it one of those two dmen became one hell of an asset for the organization. The other is barely a cliffnote.He has four goals on the year and a 4.5 mil cap hit for this year and next. That would make no sense.
Never understood the fascination with Saad.
Is a 32 year old Saad any good? Can’t say I’ve seen a ton of him.
Jake on pace for over 90 points and 50 goals this season.
I don’t understand how Sid isn’t livid. People in the front office looked at him with a straight face and said they were going to compete.
As does O'Connors.Boy Hoglanders value keeps tanking. I don’t think he will take much to get.
Jake didn't want to re-sign here.Jake on pace for over 90 points and 50 goals this season.
I don’t understand how Sid isn’t livid. People in the front office looked at him with a straight face and said they were going to compete.
Generally agree with the direction suggested here. DOC is a nice player if you're a contender looking for that one extra piece, but he's not going to be an affordable middle sixer the next time the Penguins fit that description.I think an inconvenient conclusion we need to start coming to here is that it is 1000% time to move on from DOC if there is value to be had there. I love this kid, and when you look at the specs on paper, it's all there - size, speed, and forechecking - but none of it manifests into anything useful for us. I don't think there would be any discernable difference between Hayes, Puljujarvi, or DOC in the lineup. But several people have suggested he would have lots of value around the league, and I honestly see why a team would want him. He's our own Barclay Goodrow and if we can get a good deal, we need to take it. Again, love the kid and I want him to be successful but it's now on that list of non-impact players that we need less of.
Couple possible offers:
Dallas: Bourque for DOC+3rd
Avs: Ritchie for DOC+3rd+
Tampa: LA's 2nd straight up
Minnesota: Tougher as they have fewer picks unless we take a 2nd in 2026. But they have a couple decent prospects. Perhaps Riley Heidt?
I'd also be willing to add him in with Pettersson to get that larger deal like: Hoglander, Pettersson, 1st.
I think an inconvenient conclusion we need to start coming to here is that it is 1000% time to move on from DOC if there is value to be had there. I love this kid, and when you look at the specs on paper, it's all there - size, speed, and forechecking - but none of it manifests into anything useful for us. I don't think there would be any discernable difference between Hayes, Puljujarvi, or DOC in the lineup. But several people have suggested he would have lots of value around the league, and I honestly see why a team would want him. He's our own Barclay Goodrow and if we can get a good deal, we need to take it. Again, love the kid and I want him to be successful but it's now on that list of non-impact players that we need less of.
Couple possible offers:
Dallas: Bourque for DOC+3rd
Avs: Ritchie for DOC+3rd+
Tampa: LA's 2nd straight up
Minnesota: Tougher as they have fewer picks unless we take a 2nd in 2026. But they have a couple decent prospects. Perhaps Riley Heidt?
I'd also be willing to add him in with Pettersson to get that larger deal like: Hoglander, Pettersson, 1st.
Jake didn't want to re-sign here.