Salary Cap: Pens '24-'25 Salary Thread: The Crosbicles Volume XIX

PenguinSuitedUp

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 2, 2019
1,117
1,383
We don't even know if he has the power to fire him. Ownership adores him.
Yeah, exactly. I’m not going to claim knowledge of who has what authority. I tend to think that if Dubas left Toronto, he probably came to the Penguins assuming he’d have authority to fire the coach. But I’m also not going to judge and name-call a general manager, whose goal is to have a mid-long term positive impact, on 1 year of tenure. Especially when he’s already made some good moves.
 

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
4,734
4,334
Sacramento, CA
The only reasons I criticize Dubas is he hasn't really done a favorable deal and he has brought on too many bloat players in general that are gumming up the pipeline and allowing Sullivan to ice what he is icing.

Mostly.
 

PenguinSuitedUp

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 2, 2019
1,117
1,383
The only reasons I criticize Dubas is he hasn't really done a favorable deal and he has brought on too many bloat players in general that are gumming up the pipeline and allowing Sullivan to ice what he is icing.

Mostly.
What do you mean he hasn’t done a favorable deal? I interpret that to mean he hasn’t made any net positive trades, which he absolutely has.
 

AuroraBorealis

Back-to-back hater
Oct 16, 2018
20,232
17,510
Vancouver, British Columbia
Yeah, exactly. I’m not going to claim knowledge of who has what authority. I tend to think that if Dubas left Toronto, he probably came to the Penguins assuming he’d have authority to fire the coach. But I’m also not going to judge and name-call a general manager, whose goal is to have a mid-long term positive impact, on 1 year of tenure. Especially when he’s already made some good moves.
A lot of people are really angry with the state of the team and feel compelled to direct it at the easiest targets without analyzing things at all.
It's always been like that here, whenever things are going poorly.

The reality is Dubas has made good trades. The Graves signing looks bad, but we're only on the start of year 2 and don't know how it'll go from here.
The Jarry one is flexing with hindsight. Goalies are random, and he's been good in this league before.
The lower cost signings have been pretty reasonable.
Wilkes certainly improved thanks to him too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PenguinSuitedUp

PenguinSuitedUp

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 2, 2019
1,117
1,383
What player here now vs 18 months ago has moved the needle?

What cap space has he opened up?
Dubas has made some very shrewd moves to obtain more and higher quality picks. They aren’t blockbusters, but over time with more moves like this, we will build a more robust prospect pool. The Glass, Hayes, and Blues pick swap deals are all net positives for this team. And frankly, the Karlsson trade was fantastic. We dumped a bunch of net negative players and traded a 1st round pick to take a shot on an HOF lock who scored 56 points on a down year in a defensive system that is looking to soon expire.
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,044
77,911
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
Dubas has made some very shrewd moves to obtain more and higher quality picks. They aren’t blockbusters, but over time with more moves like this, we will build a more robust prospect pool. The Glass, Hayes, and Blues pick swap deals are all net positives for this team. And frankly, the Karlsson trade was fantastic. We dumped a bunch of net negative players and traded a 1st round pick to take a shot on an HOF lock who scored 56 points on a down year in a defensive system that is looking to soon expire.

Granlund has 70 points in 78 games with the Sharks.

It’s weird how the McCann trade is often brought up as a franchise killer, but Granlund is consistently referred to as “a net negative”.

Also he traded a 1st and a 2nd. The 1st became a potential franchise defenseman in Dickinson (I don’t think he makes it there, but that is the high end of him as a prospect.)
 

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,073
5,142
burgh
People have to pick one side of the fence, though. You guys want to blame Dubas for not firing Sullivan, then you want to blame ownership for not firing Sullivan and name-call Dubas in the meantime. It’s a constant narrative shift to see who can be the biggest complainer on this board. There’s plenty of conversation to be had, but Dubas has barely been here and some people just seem like they want to hate the guy. I think he’s overall made some very good moves with a franchise in a position that is very difficult to navigate.
the one constant is that sully needs to go. we just lack the proper info to know can/will do it. :popcorn:
 

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,044
77,911
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
People have to pick one side of the fence, though. You guys want to blame Dubas for not firing Sullivan, then you want to blame ownership for not firing Sullivan and name-call Dubas in the meantime. It’s a constant narrative shift to see who can be the biggest complainer on this board. There’s plenty of conversation to be had, but Dubas has barely been here and some people just seem like they want to hate the guy. I think he’s overall made some very good moves with a franchise in a position that is very difficult to navigate.

Sullivan needs to be fired. Ultimately, that is on the GM.

Giving Dubas excuses like “he’s made very good moves” because his situation was “very difficult to navigate” is loser mentality in my mind.

Dubas was given the type of contract a star player gets in the NHL. He was paid to come in and turn our situation into a positive one. Instead, he’s given away prime future assets in our 2024 1st and potentially Yager for “win now” pieces in McG and Karsson.

It’s weird how people refuse to hold him accountable because he did the easiest thing in the world in taking back a bad contract for a 2nd and moving Reilly Smith for a 2nd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BusinessGoose

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,073
5,142
burgh
Sullivan needs to be fired. Ultimately, that is on the GM.

Giving Dubas excuses like “he’s made very good moves” because his situation was “very difficult to navigate” is loser mentality in my mind.

Dubas was given the type of contract a star player gets in the NHL. He was paid to come in and turn our situation into a positive one. Instead, he’s given away prime future assets in our 2024 1st and potentially Yager for “win now” pieces in McG and Karsson.

It’s weird how people refuse to hold him accountable because he did the easiest thing in the world in taking back a bad contract for a 2nd and moving Reilly Smith for a 2nd.
do you KNOW the gm has that ability?
 

Big Friggin Dummy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
25,636
24,693
People have to pick one side of the fence, though. You guys want to blame Dubas for not firing Sullivan, then you want to blame ownership for not firing Sullivan and name-call Dubas in the meantime. It’s a constant narrative shift to see who can be the biggest complainer on this board. There’s plenty of conversation to be had, but Dubas has barely been here and some people just seem like they want to hate the guy. I think he’s overall made some very good moves with a franchise in a position that is very difficult to navigate.
I mean, there's enough dysfunction and idiocy for the blame to be spread around. Why does it have to be "pick a side" when all sides are at fault? This "pick one thing" stuff is stupid and lazy. Pretty much everyone from ownership (past and present), the FO (past and present), and coach are guilty of stupid bullshit that's cratered this team over the years. But there's been one constant; Sullivan.

We know who Sully is. We know why he sucks. We know he's never gonna change. Dude needed fired after the 2020 play-in where he torpedoed the team by overplaying JJ-Schultz and refusing to mix up lines that weren't working. That's after he just shrugged and decided he wasn't gonna do anything about the Isles' forecheck shredding this team in a playoff sweep in 2019.

Pretty much every public facing decision FSG has made since taking over has been dogshit. They extended Sully two years before his current deal was even up after this team had their fourth consecutive 1st round embarrassment with Sully at the helm.

Dubas is a guy I'm largely waiting to judge for the post-Sid era because this era's been done and dusted for years. But you can still pick apart and analyze his moves/non-moves now, though again, I don't think they matter nearly as much as what he does to get this team built back up to competing again. I think taking on Glass and Hayes for picks was good. I think keeping the "we'll see how it goes" signings of Beau and Grz to 1yr deals was good. I think the EK deal was a mistake in hindsight, though I was for it at the time. I think the Graves deal was awful, and I wanted him signed. I think the Jarry deal was f***ing awful, and that's not a hindsight thing. My biggest gripe is his insistence that Sully is some mastermind coach who needs to be kept around despite all the mountains of evidence to the contrary.

That doesn't even touch on the issues of JR and Hextall's FOs, or Mario's ownership decisions as his time wound down as the head honcho.

Things have been bad for a very long time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BlindWillyMcHurt

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,863
10,772
I think it's fine, correct even, to simultaneously want Sullivan to lose his job due to years of psychotic, ego-driven, piss poor coaching and a total unwillingness to even attempt to coach younger players, while also criticizing Dubas for his moves throughout a full calendar year and change, and his refusal to fire the extremely problematic coach. /shrug
The problem is that Sullivan ruins players. Trying to parse out how much it was Dubas making a bad decision and how much is Sullivan is a bigger waste of time than talking about hockey on a message board already is.

Even his 2 biggest mistakes, Jarry and Graves, have shown to be capable in the past. Maybe they turn it around under a new coach.
 

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
4,734
4,334
Sacramento, CA
do you KNOW the gm has that ability?

lol if the GM willingly came on board even knowing that his hands would be tied then he's definitely a loser.

It is pretty funny.

KD was about to just be jobless for an indefinite amount of time.

Then he decided to make millions in a position without power.

If he had morals, he would quit because he can't run the team properly and go back to being jobless.

But millions can make anyone close their eyes
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlindWillyMcHurt

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,044
77,911
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
The problem is that Sullivan ruins players. Trying to parse out how much it was Dubas making a bad decision and how much is Sullivan is a bigger waste of time than talking about hockey on a message board already is.

Even his 2 biggest mistakes, Jarry and Graves, have shown to be capable in the past. Maybe they turn it around under a new coach.

Weird how Rutherford and Hextall didn’t get this explanation.
 

pistolpete11

Registered User
Apr 27, 2013
11,863
10,772
Weird how Rutherford and Hextall didn’t get this explanation.
They did from me. I've been wanting Sullivan fired since the Islanders sweep because even though those rosters weren't always perfect, they were better than what Sullivan got out of them....just like this team.
 

Pens x

Registered User
Oct 8, 2016
16,347
8,121
it’s incredible there are still so many people here defending Dubas. I feel like I am living in 2020 when so many here refused to criticize Sully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gurglesons

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
9,409
10,233
lol if the GM willingly came on board even knowing that his hands would be tied then he's definitely a loser.
I’ll happily be a loser then for $42 mil guaranteed lol

This team so stale. They just need to fire Sullivan.

It doesn’t matter who is GM or what moves they make. Same problems persist across 3 GMs and different ideas and players brought in. The entire roster has been turned over 2x now.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
35,842
30,716
I’ll happily be a loser then for $42 mil guaranteed lol

This team so stale. They just need to fire Sullivan.

It doesn’t matter who is GM or what moves they make. Same problems persist across 3 GMs and different ideas and players brought in. The entire roster has been turned over 2x now.

Hey sure I mean that's a lot of money to turn down.

It's just unfortunate for us fans if that's the case. Though I do not really believe it to be. I think Dubas essentially likes Sullivan as much as ownership, a lot of Penguins fans and much of the league seems to.

Which of course at this juncture makes him a dolt. But this team is dusted anyway and clearly nobody who can actually make any decisions cares so why should I.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad