Ugene Magic
EVIL LAUGH
I would be putting Zucker back with Geno.
But I don't see a soft buy for him. Especially if they do any retaining on him.
But I don't see a soft buy for him. Especially if they do any retaining on him.
I think what is making Zegras a "buy low" candidate would be compounded here under Sullivan making him a cap dump by the end of the season.Not a fan of him but Zegras seems like a buy-low type that’s up Dubas’ alley. A cheaper option might be Krebs, Jokiharju or Lundkqvist in Dallas.
Yeah but if they were gonna use those guys, they have no reason not to right nowI'd 100% rather give McGroarty or Koivunen any spot that you'd be trading for Zucker to fill over trading for Zucker, even if the young guys aren't ready yet.
I think 3 is a lofty goal no matter how rational it may be. I don't think it's unrealistic to suggest two though but I think that will require two things: a forward going out with Pettersson and a new forward coming back and we need another forward to get injured and for the replacement to force Sullivan's hand.I will continue to repeat my belief that a serious Penguins team needs 3 new forwards.
Or, in other words, in a situation where trading for Zucker makes sense, you can do that and still look at getting McGroarty up to play on a meaningful third line.
I am not saying that we would do that. I am saying that Hayes cannot be moved off this team now unless we pay handsomely to do so, or we eat more cap space and send him down. That was my point. He is the de facto 13th forward until further notice.Why would the Penguins be paying to get rid of him?
Hayes was acquired in the first place because St. Louis paid basically a 2nd and 3rd for him. Why would the Penguins then trade him to get rid of him? He was brought in specifically because St. Louis paid us to take him.
The fact that you still have Beauvillier in your lineup stuns me! I thought it was only Emp who was a fan of his. What am I missing with this guy? He skates around like he lost his head in a duel. He scores a goal every month. LOOKS like he is skating fast, but is more quick than fast. Is not the hardest worker, although he should be. Can't kill penalties. Is useless on the power play. Is not a big hitter or even a hitter for show, et al.I think 3 is a lofty goal no matter how rational it may be. I don't think it's unrealistic to suggest two though but I think that will require two things: a forward going out with Pettersson and a new forward coming back and we need another forward to get injured and for the replacement to force Sullivan's hand.
Example: Pettersson+DOC for Pettersson + 1st, Parssinen (as my example) for a 3rd. Nieto gets hurt, and Pono steps up.
Rakell-Sid-Rust
Bunting-Malkin-Tomasino
Parssinen-Lizotte-Beauvillier
Pono-Acciari-Glass
POJ-Letang
Pickering-Karlsson
Graves-Gryz-Pettersson
I am not saying that we would do that. I am saying that Hayes cannot be moved off this team now unless we pay handsomely to do so, or we eat more cap space and send him down. That was my point. He is the de facto 13th forward until further notice.
Emp, you seem perfectly content with this roster with the likes of Anthony Beauvillier and Kevin Hayes et al. but I sincerely hope Dubas is not thinking along the same lines.
This roster is flawed, with the middle forwards a big issue right now. But we are clearly good enough to make the playoffs. Dubas has a very difficult task, made even more difficult by his head coach's nightly lineup decisions.
Whether it is by promotion (which again is going to be difficult unless we waive some bodies) or by trade, we need help up front. The first line can only be hot for a finite period of time. Malkin's line needs a right-winger who is both talented enough to produce (like a Tomasino) AND a player this coach can trust (like a Glass). Not easy to find.
And no, I don't want Jason Zucker back. Been there, done that. No thanks.
He was basically done last season. There is no turnaround under Sullivan for Kevin Hayes. We will have to trade a valuable pick or prospect to get rid of him now.
Pencil him in as the 13th forward next season. OR, eat more cap space and send him to the AHL to finish off his playing days.
Why would the Penguins be paying to get rid of him?
Hayes was acquired in the first place because St. Louis paid basically a 2nd and 3rd for him. Why would the Penguins then trade him to get rid of him? He was brought in specifically because St. Louis paid us to take him.
I am not saying that we would do that. I am saying that Hayes cannot be moved off this team now unless we pay handsomely to do so, or we eat more cap space and send him down. That was my point. He is the de facto 13th forward until further notice.
Emp, you seem perfectly content with this roster with the likes of Anthony Beauvillier and Kevin Hayes et al. but I sincerely hope Dubas is not thinking along the same lines.
This roster is flawed, with the middle forwards a big issue right now. But we are clearly good enough to make the playoffs. Dubas has a very difficult task, made even more difficult by his head coach's nightly lineup decisions.
Whether it is by promotion (which again is going to be difficult unless we waive some bodies) or by trade, we need help up front. The first line can only be hot for a finite period of time. Malkin's line needs a right-winger who is both talented enough to produce (like a Tomasino) AND a player this coach can trust (like a Glass). Not easy to find.
And no, I don't want Jason Zucker back. Been there, done that. No thanks.
This team is rebuilding and all I care about is adding youth and young talent to both the NHL team and prospect pool. Their sole focus should be building for the future, not trying to squeak into a playoff spot as a 7th or 8th seed and getting embarrassed in round 1 to a clearly better team.
It took him, what, 3 years to finally put Rakell with Sid?Sullivan is so stupid…Glass has been a total failure on L2 and so has DOC….Tomasino got like 5 games there…give him a little more time, patience…lol
Someone should tell the GM. I think he’s unaware.This team is rebuilding and all I care about is adding youth and young talent to both the NHL team and prospect pool. Their sole focus should be building for the future, not trying to squeak into a playoff spot as a 7th or 8th seed and getting embarrassed in round 1 to a clearly better team.
I guess I'm not as down on Beauvillier as others. That's not an afidavid stating I think he's the best player on the team but at the same time, I think he has all of the skill sets we would typically want in a player. I actually quite liked him with Sid because he was a shot-producing machine. He's tied for 5th on the team in goals with 8, 1 behind Bunting, and 2 behind Sid. Pacing for 18. For the cost, he's a decent bottom 6 scoring solution.The fact that you still have Beauvillier in your lineup stuns me! I thought it was only Emp who was a fan of his. What am I missing with this guy? He skates around like he lost his head in a duel. He scores a goal every month. LOOKS like he is skating fast, but is more quick than fast. Is not the hardest worker, although he should be. Can't kill penalties. Is useless on the power play. Is not a big hitter or even a hitter for show, et al.
In other words, he brings zero to the table. It baffles me that Sullivan is sticking with him. Puljujarvi is even faster than Beauvillier, it just takes more time to get there.
I can understand why Sullivan keeps Nieto and O'Connor in the lineup: they remind him of himself. Nieto is who he was, O'Connor is likely who he wanted to become as a player. But Beauvillier? Not even Kent Hughes, who has brought back a lot of his ex-clients (save for Letang, though if rumors are accurate not for a lack of trying), is interested in Beauvillier.
Can we just waive him and move on already? He could actually help Wilkes-Barre/Scranton. Because he sure as shit cannot help the parent club.
Someone should tell the GM. I think he’s unaware.
Well, they are semi commital... So the narrative could be spun as rebuilding if the team sucked, or as good future moves if it worked outAll of the moves this team has been making are rebuilding moves dating back to the Guentzel trade.
POJ, Tomasino, Glass with a 3rd and a 6th, 2nd+3rd from Hayes, and Puljujarvi. All under 26. Smith out for a 2nd. Eller out for a 3rd and a 5thSomeone should tell the GM. I think he’s unaware.
No thanks on Zucker
The goal is (as has been explained on numerous occasions) to compete as best we can now with minor trades and low-risk signings while collecting young players and draft picks for the future. Yes, it's a tough thing to balance and it's the best of neither world. But the fact is, the organization committed itself to trying to be competitive while Sid is here.Well, they are semi commital... So the narrative could be spun as rebuilding if the team sucked, or as good future moves if it worked out
It's not a rebuild right now. Maybe a retool. We will see how it progresses.
Put cheap/ELC youth out if you're gonna be ineffective anyway... Acciaris of the world should be filling out effective rosters with some sort of intangible that those teams might think they have a need for.
He brings NOTHING of use to a bottom 15 team that is at the cap maximum already