Tom Hanks
Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
- Nov 10, 2017
- 31,480
- 34,057
When have they cared about putting high producing players who drive play with Geno? Lol
Great, now I’m craving hotdogs
When have they cared about putting high producing players who drive play with Geno? Lol
Didn’t he start out with Sid first, didn’t mesh and then Geno got him? …same with Bunting…that seems to be the way first lolPhil Kessel
I think you are adding for Hague, but I mean most of these are ideas that I've been about this year.
Also think you are adding in a back-up goaltender over Blomqvist.
Yeah they have an extra $2 million in cap space to wiggle around with if they want to get another Nedjelkovic to be the backup.
Even if they’d go with a $1.5 million backup, they’d still have like $6 million prorated cap space at the deadline.
We’ve had some history with newly acquired D men taking until the 2nd year here to become decent (not that I know much about Graves)
Well he had Kessel who could do shit on his own and drive the play, and Neal who was the play finishing triggerman. /shrugWhen have they cared about putting high producing players who drive play with Geno? Lol
You certainly could do this, but I don't think it takes advantages of the resources we do have in the system.
You certainly could do this, but I don't think it takes advantages of the resources we do have in the system.
I'd rather take the 4M from Colton, 3.1M from Arviddson, 3M from Trennin and spend it on one 10m impact W.
- St. Ivany showed enough that I am fine penciling him in as the #6. We do need a Ruhwedel type behind him that can step in for injuries or poor form that wont lose their game in the pressbox. That was always the Ruhwedel value - as a #7.
- Spending 4M on a 3C doesn't make sense to me when we have Ponomarev, Poulin, Eller or DOC that can fill that role, probably in that order of preference. Try the guys we have, add externally in December if you have to.
- 3m for a 4th liner doesn't seem like good asset management. Tanev 2.0. Love the player, hate the value for his usage. Gruden is an option, Acciari is an option (on the W), as are the loser of the Poulin/Pono battle, Puljiarvi, etc. There's better places to spend that money.
- I don't think we need to retain 2.5m just to dump Reilly Smith, unless it's a part of a big trade for an under market value guy coming back. It's just one year, but that still hurts.
Well he had Kessel who could do shit on his own and drive the play, and Neal who was the play finishing triggerman. /shrug
Everyone acts like Geno's always had Taylor Pyatt on his wing. He's had some very, very good players to play with.![]()
Johnston played him with Sid. That didn't happen much after Sullivan replaced Johnston.Didn’t he start out with Sid first, didn’t mesh and then Geno got him? …same with Bunting…that seems to be the way first lol
Reinhart, Marner, Stamkos, Guentzel pt2 etc.And who is this lol?
I like the direction. Personally, I'd prefer someone a touch younger than Arvidsson. I'd rather not use the $1 million on Stecher and the $3.1 on RV and see what I could get for $4 million. I don't have a particular name, though.
I think they tried kessel with sidDidn’t he start out with Sid first, didn’t mesh and then Geno got him? …same with Bunting…that seems to be the way first lol
I like the direction. Personally, I'd prefer someone a touch younger than Arvidsson. I'd rather not use the $1 million on Stecher and the $3.1 on RV and see what I could get for $4 million. I don't have a particular name, though.
Reinhart, Marner, Stamkos, Guentzel pt2 etc.
Stamkos will be re-signed as well. You don't let go of your captain and 40 goal scorer.I don’t see Reinhart or Marner being available.
Gaudreau, McCann, Tanev, Rodrigues and Blueger is a lot of decent depth just pissed away for (almost) no reason. Oh well. At least Brian Boyle was dope that one year.I was legitimately bummed when he didn't bring back Gaudreau.
I always liked what he brought to the table.