GDT: Penguins Trade Deadline thread: What can we get for 3 packs of gum and a signed hockey puck?

We want?!

  • A shrubbery

    Votes: 25 22.5%
  • Chychrun

    Votes: 20 18.0%
  • Karlsson

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Some other big name player

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Gritty bottom 6 player

    Votes: 11 9.9%
  • Gritty bottom pairing defenseman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Offensive bottom pairing defenseman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Goalie

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • Some crazy move out of left field

    Votes: 16 14.4%
  • To be sellers

    Votes: 32 28.8%

  • Total voters
    111
Status
Not open for further replies.

Zirakzigil

Global Moderator
Jul 5, 2010
30,637
26,587
Canada
*** Keep this thread to Penguins related trades, rumors, rumblings, etc only please.***

skipper-madagascar.gif

Keep NHL related talk to this thread please:
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
24,481
11,657
I think it’s more the fact that the other teams in the east drastically improved while we…uhhh…didn’t.
Here's why, they had more assets, cap space and draft picks over the last few years and didn't piss them away like We have. That's what happens when you have generational talents like we had year in a year out. Those guys needed to be paid. So other teams had more cap flexibility at least in the last couple few years. We were at the top of the mountain for a long time, let's be thankful for that. But the show is over and it has been for a while now. Maybe now reality is setting in for some of you.
 

ChaosAgent

Registered User
May 8, 2018
18,561
12,606
I am guessing Granlund replaces Zucker. Cheaper and gets more points and not injured like Zucker has been since getting here.
I just hate the way Guentzel plays, as far as star players go. I like the production but it's so floaty and soft. I don't think it is what Sid needs moving forward. That plus you could seriously cash in on value with him.
 

DeadPuckEra

Registered User
Dec 19, 2014
1,298
670
Weren't there reports saying the cap was going up at least 4mil next season?

Not that that makes granlund at 5 mil any better, but it helps fill out the rest of the roster

NHL doesn’t seem like it’s in the greatest spot right now. Might affect that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

Pancakes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2011
27,375
19,921
Here's why, they had more assets, cap space and draft picks over the last few years and didn't piss them away like We have. That's what happens when you have generational talents like we had year in a year out. Those guys needed to be paid. So other teams had more cap flexibility at least in the last couple few years. We were at the top of the mountain for a long time, let's be thankful for that. But the show is over and it has been for a while now. Maybe now reality is setting in for some of you.
We had enough assets to do better than Hextall did
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99

DesertedPenguin

Registered User
Mar 11, 2007
7,429
8,342
It’s been game over though. These guys all got up in years at once. They aren’t at the end of the road but they aren’t in any shape to carry a team through the playoffs anymore either.

From a pure business standpoint. Malkin and Letang should have been set free. You could have used all that cap to acquire younger players. Start getting youthful - then you can carry Sid and try to compete until he’s 40 or whatever. You just can’t have 3 aging guys like that making that kind of money. It’s too much of a handicap.
You would have paid more for younger players. That was the benefit of them sticking around.

Plus, Malkin and Letang haven't been the problem. It's the bottom six that have been the issue.
 

ZorkEnchanter

Registered User
Aug 16, 2020
2,620
2,483
It’s been game over though. These guys all got up in years at once. They aren’t at the end of the road but they aren’t in any shape to carry a team through the playoffs anymore either.

From a pure business standpoint. Malkin and Letang should have been set free. You could have used all that cap to acquire younger players. Start getting youthful - then you can carry Sid and try to compete until he’s 40 or whatever. You just can’t have 3 aging guys like that making that kind of money. It’s too much of a handicap.

Sure but with the 20+ million in Cap Space would could have tried. Now we can't do anything.

Like I said, a new GM might come in and waste all those picks trying to trade off contracts to cycle through again...

So bad.
 

ZorkEnchanter

Registered User
Aug 16, 2020
2,620
2,483
You would have paid more for younger players. That was the benefit of them sticking around.

Plus, Malkin and Letang haven't been the problem. It's the bottom six that have been the issue.

And now we are stuck with the entire Bottom 6 next year and the next... (unless we trade picks/contracts)
 

Extra Texture

A new career
Mar 21, 2008
8,906
3,763
in a new town
From theathletic



Sick. :laugh:
Holy shit, those takedowns are f***ing lethal. WOW.

It’s hard to square this with what Hextall last year, adding Rackell at a reasonable price. That was so risk averse. This is like the Carter move all over again. Except, if we gave Carter the extension before he played a single minute for us.

Hextall has dialed up the risk factor so high in this one for a modest comparable gain. I wonder if he knows he is going to likely to be fired in June, and thinks “I need a Hail Mary, and if I get anything less than that I’m toast anyway.” Like, he doesn’t mind throwing away the cap, because he will be unemployed in June barring a miracle, and him looking like a genius as Granlund goes PPG down the stretch or something
 
Last edited:

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,645
34,438
what’s so perplexing is Hextall’s apparent take or lack thereof on this team after watching 90% of the games…I mean how could anyone look at this team so far this year and think “You know what we need for our bottom six? To get rid of three underperforming forwards in exchange for one, even higher paid, underperforming forward who doesn’t have size, grit, defensive prowess and doesn’t even forecheck like a mother, which is how the coach plays.” Does the GM even watch the team lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeygod66

66-30-33

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
64,081
17,044
Victoria, BC
I just hate the way Guentzel plays, as far as star players go. I like the production but it's so floaty and soft. I don't think it is what Sid needs moving forward. That plus you could seriously cash in on value with him.
I don't think Crosby will be happy losing him. I also dunno what he fetches. I don't want picks, rather have young players.
 

ChaosAgent

Registered User
May 8, 2018
18,561
12,606
I don't think Crosby will be happy losing him. I also dunno what he fetches. I don't want picks, rather have young players.
Crosby would benefit immensely from someone like this year's Zucker.

Guentzel is also a net negative to the first powerplay
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
24,481
11,657
The guys love Zucker and this is his former line mate.

I dunno. Granlund was at one point considered the best prospect outside of the NHL. He’s a skilled guy and he fits in with what we have built. It just sucks to add that contract and the same type of player we always f***ing add..
Well, it was either him or McDavid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad