Penguins reduce their roster by 6 players

Penguinator

Kesselator
Sep 17, 2014
3,999
2
Space
Looks like we're set to start the season. No complaints here. I just want to see Lovejoy waived, Kunitz traded for Tinordi and Johnston canned.

But I can live with this roster, for sure.

Tinordi's decision making is slow in every regard, this is a long shot that requires patience, Kunitz is way more effective at this point in time. MJ is just trying **** before the season starts, don't be so trigger happy.
 

SHOOTANDSCORE

Eeny Meeny Miny Moe
Sep 25, 2005
10,952
4,675
Probably not possible. If they play well on the 4th line, the org would probably just see it as them being geniuses to have constructed such a line...
You're exactly right. We will know, but the majority will just eat up the PR.

Meanwhile, Earnitz will be flubbing chances like a one eyed ping pong player.
 

Zen Arcade

Bigger than Kiss
Sep 21, 2004
20,310
2,222
Pittsburgh
Tinordi's decision making is slow in every regard, this is a long shot that requires patience, Kunitz is way more effective at this point in time. MJ is just trying **** before the season starts, don't be so trigger happy.

Tinordi is really tempting, with his size, mean streak and skating though.

I'd probably do Bennett for Tinordi, project for project. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to run away and throw a bunch of furniture behind me so the rest of the board doesn't kill me.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,650
22,176
Pittsburgh
Looks like JR is warming to the idea of an extended stay for Sprong:



http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...-moves-ahead-of-deadline/stories/201510030167

I really hope he's serious. And honestly I wouldn't be shocked if he is. JR doesn't seem like he'd be shy about this kind of stuff. Especially if there really are plans to move Perron. I still don't want it to happen, but Sprong becoming an instant NHL forward would certainly take some of the sting away from a Perron trade.
 

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,719
8,174
For about the final six months of last season Perron was loathed on these boards and in Kunitz and Scuderi territory, now he's in the Bennett/Despres pantheon of unrealized dreams. Did he have that good a camp?

The people that loathed him are either not here or had moments of idiocy
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,650
22,176
Pittsburgh
For about the final six months of last season Perron was loathed on these boards and in Kunitz and Scuderi territory, now he's in the Bennett/Despres pantheon of unrealized dreams. Did he have that good a camp?

he's had that good of a career
 

IcedCapp

Registered User
Aug 7, 2009
36,004
11,758
Perron was acquired in January. It's physically impossible for him to be loathed for the final six months of the season. Add to that the fact that he was absolutely loved the first month or so, and we can first start by saying, "make the questionable things you post less obviously questionable."

Next, we can say that juding a player on a two-month sample (more accurate) is not how a smart person would conduct themselves. If you're judging Perron on those two months, the fourth line would be comprised of everyone on the roster outside of Crosby, Kessel and Hornqvist.

I would say "good luck in your future endeavors", but I didn't quote you for a reason.
 

Farnham4top6

Despres #1D
Mar 6, 2011
2,666
21
north of you
Hopefully Scuderi is moved or contracts full-blown AIDS. Then Erixon & Clendening can actually play on a rotation basis and we can move one or both when Pouliot sorts things out in the next month or two.

Clendening was pretty good in preseason and Erixon was hardly noticeable which is a good thing.

I thought he still looked like the guy that got carried defensively by Rundblad.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
There are some people pushing hard for him to stay

Wasn't it JR who kept hinting KK could play in the NHL last summer?

I'm not totally sure how NHL ready Sprong is yet, but he looks like Jagr compared to KK last preseason.

If he can be somewhat productive in his nine games (4-5 points?) and most importantly show he can be trusted, maybe he has a chance to stick.

Hopefully he keeps using his speed to get back and hound guys with the puck. That's a natural gift he has that he can use to his advantage. He can generating a ton of offense that way and really endear himself to the coaching staff for playing responsible hockey. He just has to be careful about trying to do too much, especially when he faces systematic hockey which wasn't being played that well during pre-season.

If he starts turning pucks over and becomes a liability, he will be on the short bus soon...
 

Lomez

Too Awesome for Top 100
Mar 29, 2009
7,433
1,132
PGH, PA
Perron was acquired in January. It's physically impossible for him to be loathed for the final six months of the season. Add to that the fact that he was absolutely loved the first month or so, and we can first start by saying, "make the questionable things you post less obviously questionable."

Next, we can say that juding a player on a two-month sample (more accurate) is not how a smart person would conduct themselves. If you're judging Perron on those two months, the fourth line would be comprised of everyone on the roster outside of Crosby, Kessel and Hornqvist.

I would say "good luck in your future endeavors", but I didn't quote you for a reason.

...and, of course, I feel ever so slighted slighted suffering such indignity from an anonymous poster on the internet :laugh:. Please respond to me!

However, my point remains that Perron was excoriated on these boards for his lack of production during the drive to playoffs and in the series against the Rangers (I suppose you would characterize such people as "not very smart"). Now, there is much brow-mopping over him being traded (I would characterize those people as "pretty smart"). Having not had a chance to see many games, I was wondering if he was that impressive during camp to prompt such a shift in HFB consensus.

BTW, I am a Perron fan and wasn't particularly worried that his form and the end of last season was permanent.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
...and, of course, I feel ever so slighted slighted suffering such indignity from an anonymous poster on the internet :laugh:. Please respond to me!

However, my point remains that Perron was excoriated on these boards for his lack of production during the drive to playoffs and in the series against the Rangers (I suppose you would characterize such people as "not very smart"). Now, there is much brow-mopping over him being traded (I would characterize those people as "pretty smart"). Having not had a chance to see many games, I was wondering if he was that impressive during camp to prompt such a shift in HFB consensus.

BTW, I am a Perron fan and wasn't particularly worried that his form and the end of last season was permanent.

I think it's those of us all along who have been in Perron's corner *****ing about the stupidity going on, rather than his detractors.

People love to pound their chests when they are right round here, so I'd imagine his detractors would prefer to say "told you so" than ***** how he is being used on the fourth line, at RW etc.
 

radapex

Registered User
Sep 21, 2012
7,766
528
Canada, Eh
I really hope he's serious. And honestly I wouldn't be shocked if he is. JR doesn't seem like he'd be shy about this kind of stuff. Especially if there really are plans to move Perron. I still don't want it to happen, but Sprong becoming an instant NHL forward would certainly take some of the sting away from a Perron trade.

The biggest issue I see with Sprong staying up is that it forces GMJR to make a move by about mid-November in order to ensure there's cap space for Fehr to return. Like... they're going to have to move Perron for a sub-$3m defender within the first 6 weeks of the season. Maatta and Plotnikov have not business being send down (as it stands right now), and Sprong is the only other guy on the roster that can move without waivers... but he'll be past his 9 games and burning a year of his ELC by then.
 

Harvey Birdman

…Need some law books, with pictures this time…
Oct 21, 2008
9,230
2,349
Penguins Legal Office
The biggest issue I see with Sprong staying up is that it forces GMJR to make a move by about mid-November in order to ensure there's cap space for Fehr to return. Like... they're going to have to move Perron for a sub-$3m defender within the first 6 weeks of the season. Maatta and Plotnikov have not business being send down (as it stands right now), and Sprong is the only other guy on the roster that can move without waivers... but he'll be past his 9 games and burning a year of his ELC by then.

Honestly I'm not even sweating it. Compared to years past where we were begging for a young player to inject themselves into the lineup to improve our roster situation... We have a rookie pushing a veteran Perron into a position where he will be possibly exiting our roster. IMO that's a good problem to have. And if we end up shoring up our d a bit in the end, even better. Im enthusiastic for the first time in a few years as a Pens fan, it's nice to feel that again.
 

Vujtek

Registered User
Oct 7, 2007
3,542
630
The biggest issue I see with Sprong staying up is that it forces GMJR to make a move by about mid-November in order to ensure there's cap space for Fehr to return. Like... they're going to have to move Perron for a sub-$3m defender within the first 6 weeks of the season. Maatta and Plotnikov have not business being send down (as it stands right now), and Sprong is the only other guy on the roster that can move without waivers... but he'll be past his 9 games and burning a year of his ELC by then.

They could just waive and demote Farnham or Erixon without having to do any trades. That roster would fit under the cap. So it doesn't really force trade. I mean if they trade Perron for D-man, then Erixon would still go on waivers or be added to the trade, as they wouldn't go with 9 D-man on the roster.
 

drpepper

Registered User
Dec 10, 2013
2,606
0
Honestly I'm not even sweating it. Compared to years past where we were begging for a young player to inject themselves into the lineup to improve our roster situation... We have a rookie pushing a veteran Perron into a position where he will be possibly exiting our roster. IMO that's a good problem to have. And if we end up shoring up our d a bit in the end, even better. Im enthusiastic for the first time in a few years as a Pens fan, it's nice to feel that again.

Sprong isn't pushing Perron. The coach is burying Perron. This is not the Pens have great depth; it's that the Pens would rather play Kunitz and Plotnikov neither of whom are as good or as skilled as Perron while playing Perron on the fourth line put of position.

This team has two dedicated left wings and only one of them is under thirty.

Sprong cannot replace Perron; Sprong is a RW.

I am happy Sprong has played well, but the situation with Perron is not a positive for the Pens. The situation with Kunitz is not a positive for the Pens.
 

mpp9

Registered User
Dec 5, 2010
32,617
5,074
How do you know Sprong cant play LW? Unless theyre kicking PH out the top 6 (which I wouldnt be against) , theyre going to need to find that out eventually.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
How do you know Sprong cant play LW? Unless theyre kicking PH out the top 6 (which I wouldnt be against) , theyre going to need to find that out eventually.

Just a couple of years ago we were wishing for a RH winger, now they have too many...

Kessel, Hornqvist, Perron, BB, and Sprong. Pretty much all of their top six, should be top six, and has the potential to be top guys are righties.

At least Plotnikov is a lefty.
 

eXile59

Shirts on.
Jan 2, 2009
18,221
1
PA
How is this even an argument?

Perron is a good player, MJ is an idiot. If Perron didn't fit MJ's idea of a player, which is crap because apparently Kunitz does, then JR shouldn't have traded a 1st for him.
 

mpp9

Registered User
Dec 5, 2010
32,617
5,074
Just a couple of years ago we were wishing for a RH winger, now they have too many...

Kessel, Hornqvist, Perron, BB, and Sprong. Pretty much all of their top six, should be top six, and has the potential to be top guys are righties.

At least Plotnikov is a lefty.

I suspect at least one of Perron/BB is gone soon enough.

I want to see one of the following happen. Sprong on LW, Plot with Sid or PH on a badass shutdown line with Fehr and Dupuis.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
I suspect at least one of Perron/BB is gone soon enough.

I want to see one of the following happen. Sprong on LW, Plot with Sid or PH on a badass shutdown line with Fehr and Dupuis.

Have to see how Sprong does. Can he score at the NHL level?

Moving BB is stupid as hell. He has minimum value, but it's the Pens so...

Perron isn't a guy I'd be looking to move. Sprong is young and an unknown, he could start out hot and then really slump, get fatigued etc, BB could break his leg on any given shift, Dupuis hasn't played a full season in two years and could go back on IR at any minute.

If a couple of these scenarios or other unforeseen injuries hit, suddenly your depth doesn't look so hot. I don't see any reason to move anyone until they need to, and then logic dictates it should be Kunitz. His days as an effective player are numbered. You don't keep a soon to be scrap heap guy in lieu of a younger, proven player.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad