flyerslducks
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2017
- 12,751
- 13,609
its ok, let them get haggIf you're going all in, you don't acquire Hagg.
its ok, let them get haggIf you're going all in, you don't acquire Hagg.
I don't know that trading Pettersson for Hagg is really "dumping" Pettersson. It's trading from a position of strength (LHD puck movers) for a position of weakness (physical defenseman).
The Penguins would likely add a bit but I think it wouldn't be anything major. Maybe like Pettersson and a 3rd/4th for Hagg.
Please no.
The wounds of Jack Johnson are too fresh