- Feb 10, 2010
- 14,621
- 11,683
It's so cute that you're trying to pin the coach getting fired on 1 guy.
I am doing no such thing. I am disagreeing with the Canadian journalist who implied this was Kessel's doing.
It's so cute that you're trying to pin the coach getting fired on 1 guy.
Oh my bad I thought he was an award winning sports writer for some of the most popular Canadian news sources (including weekly appearances on TSN).
I must have the wrong guy.
I agree Johnston had multiple problems in terms of coaching, but Crosby's sub-par play this year is the single most noticeable factor.
It's so cute that you're trying to pin the coach getting fired on 1 guy. It's like you're not even trying to hide your bias.
Plot twist: MJ was fired because the team was underperforming and MJ spat in the face of the upper management and ownership by refusing to play the young players like they said they wanted. No, that can't be it though.
And that's just not true. Like I don't even know what else to say. Crosby's subpar play was one of MANY reasons for why MJ was fired. The most noticeable reason was the simplest one, the team as a whole wasn't performing and was out of a playoff spot.
Many people have observed Crosby not putting in a full effort this year.
So the captain couldn't fire up is teammates is what you're saying?
And that's just not true. Like I don't even know what else to say. Crosby's subpar play was one of MANY reasons for why MJ was fired. The most noticeable reason was the simplest one, the team as a whole wasn't performing and was out of a playoff spot.
Why did the Pens hire Mike Johnston anyway? Never really understood the hiring at that time.
So the captain couldn't fire up is teammates is what you're saying?
That's not a single factor, that is the overall result.
Right cause the Capitals captain has fired up his teammates in early to mid May so well.
Or maybe team failures are on the team overall, and not individual players?
Blaming Kessel for this is a cognitively weak opinion that fails to note many of the team's problems under Johnston predate Kessel.
Horrific timing and a misguided view that the new coach had to come from outside the organization.
Not seriously considering Hynes makes sense if there were capable options externally...but there wasn't, so Johnston basically got the job by being just about the last option on the market who was willing to accept a two-year deal that wasn't already employed by the Penguins.
Yea they were in the second round... where was Crosby again?
But when it comes to Ovechkin... it's the opposite right? I mean this is the exact reason why Crosby lovers chastise OV for not winning a SC right?
I am doing no such thing. I am disagreeing with the Canadian journalist who implied this was Kessel's doing.
Incredibly stupid and reactionary move, likely made after feeling pressure from fantasy stat watchers.
Make no mistake, there are a good amount of so called fans on here that would be very happy with 150 point Crosby/Malkin + 10th place (miss playoffs) in East every single year.
These stat watchers have absolutely livid, and have wanted Johnston gone from the getgo. They never gave him a chance. Pens had won 7 in a row. There was still snickering towards him on here.
If he was actually bad, that is one thing. He wasn't. Look at his career winning percentage. .595 is good for 34th ALLTIME.
The guy that is replacing him is 96th. These "fans" don't want to absorb this information. It's all about fantasy stats.
Brutal mistake.