Player Discussion Pavel Zacha

WhalerTurnedBruin55

Fading out, thanks for the times.
Oct 31, 2008
11,347
6,720
the way I judge deals like this is I apply my own "Michael Ryder scale". Basically is this deal better, worse, or comparable to Michael Ryder's $4m cap hit when they won the Cup in 2011. I find this to be a good comp for a few reasons:
Ryder was the prototypical middle 6 forward who does one or 2 things pretty well but lacks consistency and doesn't do enough to solidify a top 6 role. But the Cup run proved that you can absolutely win with limited guys like him in the lineup making whatever % of the cap he was making at the time (7.05% at the time of signing). Ryder was often called overpaid at the time and most reasonable people (IMO) simply argued that $4m was the going rate for what a guy like him brought.

Fast forward to today: Zacha just signed a deal that's 5.76% of the cap at the time of signing. So the question is does Zacha bring as much or more to the table as Michael Ryder in 2011?

He hasn't demonstrated the raw offensive ceiling that Ryder showed in bursts, but other than that i'd say Zacha brings a lot more to the table. He can play any situation, brings size and is younger than Ryder was when he signed that $4m deal. And he does this all for a significantly lower cap %. I also suspect he has untapped offensive potential that Ryder maybe never had. A full season playing 2C and he might put up 60+ points and make the deal look like a steal. The rest of his game is pretty repeatable IMO.

Anyway the above is only partially serious b/c I recognize this is far from scientific but the general idea is that with these middle 6 role player type contracts I look to past examples to decide if the deal feels reasonable and I think this one totally passes the sniff test.
Actually an addendum to your numbers, while correct at the time of signing, the year they won, Ryder's 4M was 4M/59.4M cap (or 6.67% of the cap) in 2011.

So Zach @ 4.65M / Estimated 83.5 will be ~5.5% of the cap next year and slowly decreasing each year.

Basically agreeing that I think this contract can be very favorable as long as Zacha continues to contribute.
 

HustleB

Cautiously Optimistic
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2017
3,029
3,407
Welcome to the Jungle
Brandon Carlo is going to be making 6 million dollars to get dunked on by the Leafs top-6 for eternity, and I am, unfortunately, here for it.

I'm afraid I have to disagree with your takes on Carlo, and it frustrates me more in the Zacha thread. But what are you referencing with 6 million? Brandon Carlo makes 4.1 M per year through 2026/2027.

By the way, I thought Zacha was outstanding in his first game post-contract. I like the deal today, and I think it has a chance to be great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearljamvs5

missingchicklet

Registered User
Jan 24, 2010
36,589
34,464
Even if the Bs overpaid a little for Zacha, which in no way do I think they did, I'd rather overpay for a player in his mid-20s trending up than overpay for a player in his 30s. DS has been down the route of the latter and got blistered for those moves. I very much welcome the philosophy of signing the likes of Zacha and Lindholm for their prime years.
 

The Andrew Peeke Fan

Registered User
Feb 26, 2020
873
1,004
I'm afraid I have to disagree with your takes on Carlo, and it frustrates me more in the Zacha thread. But what are you referencing with 6 million? Brandon Carlo makes 4.1 M per year through 2026/2027.

By the way, I thought Zacha was outstanding in his first game post-contract. I like the deal today, and I think it has a chance to be great.
Zacha rules, and I was being hyperbolic about Carlo's deal (which I don't like).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pearljamvs5

MerlotLineFan

Registered User
Jan 10, 2023
37
45
Anyone have a theory as to why Zacha's faceoff percentage is so much lower this season than his previous years?
Is it simply less reps?
 

Kegs

Registered User
Nov 10, 2010
4,085
4,895
the way I judge deals like this is I apply my own "Michael Ryder scale". Basically is this deal better, worse, or comparable to Michael Ryder's $4m cap hit when they won the Cup in 2011. I find this to be a good comp for a few reasons:
Ryder was the prototypical middle 6 forward who does one or 2 things pretty well but lacks consistency and doesn't do enough to solidify a top 6 role. But the Cup run proved that you can absolutely win with limited guys like him in the lineup making whatever % of the cap he was making at the time (7.05% at the time of signing). Ryder was often called overpaid at the time and most reasonable people (IMO) simply argued that $4m was the going rate for what a guy like him brought.

Fast forward to today: Zacha just signed a deal that's 5.76% of the cap at the time of signing. So the question is does Zacha bring as much or more to the table as Michael Ryder in 2011?

He hasn't demonstrated the raw offensive ceiling that Ryder showed in bursts, but other than that i'd say Zacha brings a lot more to the table. He can play any situation, brings size and is younger than Ryder was when he signed that $4m deal. And he does this all for a significantly lower cap %. I also suspect he has untapped offensive potential that Ryder maybe never had. A full season playing 2C and he might put up 60+ points and make the deal look like a steal. The rest of his game is pretty repeatable IMO.

Anyway the above is only partially serious b/c I recognize this is far from scientific but the general idea is that with these middle 6 role player type contracts I look to past examples to decide if the deal feels reasonable and I think this one totally passes the sniff test.
Ryders over time game 7 glove save vs habs made his contract worth 4 mil. He was good in all three zones when he wasn’t scoring as well. He was largely under rated around here.
 

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
10,053
14,950
Alberta
Anyone have a theory as to why Zacha's faceoff percentage is so much lower this season than his previous years?
Is it simply less reps?
To me it always felt like he can't focus on multiple facets of his game. He simply just goes ham with one skill while letting the others fatigue.
This guy has a big time NHL shot. It's criminal how well he's hidden it so far in his career. It feels like he has 30 goal pedigree, doesn't he? Let's start with 20 goals and see...

Bumping the old posts from the people who hated this deal should be fun.
Devils fans biggest complaint, He has such a great shot but even when he has a good scoring chance he will defer and pass to someone else. I'm happy that he seems to be doing better for the Bruins but my hairline is finally coming back since Zacha left. So much hair pulling...

pulling-hair-out-homer-simpson.gif
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,569
37,795
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
This guy has a big time NHL shot. It's criminal how well he's hidden it so far in his career. It feels like he has 30 goal pedigree, doesn't he? Let's start with 20 goals and see...

Bumping the old posts from the people who hated this deal should be fun.
Those of us that watched him in junior knew he had a big shot. Had the same problem then: didn't use it near enough.
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,841
19,367
Connecticut
Zacha since signing his extension: 9GP / 6G / 4A

Now I'm not sure that he can keep playing at over a PPG pace, but for curiosity, if he did keep this pace up he'd finish the season at:

82GP / 31G / 38A

o_O
 

Dellstrom

Pastrnasty
May 1, 2011
25,389
4,222
Boston
I knew the goal scoring would come. Even with his inconsistent scoring the eye test was always great on this guy.

Really happy we got him this summer and even more glad he’s locked up at a good term and price. He’s really found his game here. Perfectly executed low/no risk, high reward trade.
 

goldnblack

Registered User
Jun 24, 2020
3,395
6,437
Zacha since signing his extension: 9GP / 6G / 4A

Now I'm not sure that he can keep playing at over a PPG pace, but for curiosity, if he did keep this pace up he'd finish the season at:

82GP / 31G / 38A

o_O

WHEN Pasta resigns, you gotta think they staple Pasta and Zacha on the same line. IF that's the case and the minutes go up (in a post 37/46 world), Zacha becomes a PP1 guy playing at least 3 minutes more per game than today.

You gotta think with this talent level that means MORE points, not less. Goals I dunno, obviously we're seeing him scoring at a level he never has. But Monty is a special guy. If he let's the players play provided they do the things, then maybe this is what happens. They told Zacha to shoot, and my goodness he's shooting.

Second best shot on the Bruins after Pasta? Has to be. The puck EXPLODES off his stick.
 

BradMarchandismydad

Registered User
Nov 22, 2016
1,068
2,048
Boston
WHEN Pasta resigns, you gotta think they staple Pasta and Zacha on the same line. IF that's the case and the minutes go up (in a post 37/46 world), Zacha becomes a PP1 guy playing at least 3 minutes more per game than today.

You gotta think with this talent level that means MORE points, not less. Goals I dunno, obviously we're seeing him scoring at a level he never has. But Monty is a special guy. If he let's the players play provided they do the things, then maybe this is what happens. They told Zacha to shoot, and my goodness he's shooting.

Second best shot on the Bruins after Pasta? Has to be. The puck EXPLODES off his stick.

This is what got me really excited about Zacha when we first traded for him. If you watch his goals from NJ, he absolutely rifles the puck, and is going bar and in like 40% of the time.
 

missingchicklet

Registered User
Jan 24, 2010
36,589
34,464
Dunno for sure, but it seemed to me he was shooting earlier in the season, but missing the net, hitting the goalie, hitting the post, etc.
You are correct. His shot pct as of 2 1/2 weeks ago was around his career low. Since signing his contract 2 1/2 weeks ago he has already almost doubled that shot pct. It now stands at 13.3%. That's simply a massive turnaround given that he was already on pace to top his career-high SOG. His bad puck luck from earlier in the year was bound to end, and it apparently has.

An already great contract is looking even better now that the goal scoring part of Zacha's game is catching up with the other great things he is doing this season.
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,569
37,795
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
Zacha ranks 8th on the team in attempted shots with 137 behind Pastrnak (445), Bergeron (298), Hall (217), Lindholm (208), Marchand (208), DeBrusk (162), and Coyle (156).

Zacha ranks 7th at 60.6% at getting his shot on net behind Frederic (68.3), DeBrusk (67.3), Nosek (66.2), Greer (65.4), Foligno (62.0), and Coyle (61.5).

Frederic, with just 101 attempted shots and Zacha should both be shooting more.
 

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
35,353
20,952
Watertown
Zacha ranks 8th on the team in attempted shots with 137 behind Pastrnak (445), Bergeron (298), Hall (217), Lindholm (208), Marchand (208), DeBrusk (162), and Coyle (156).

Zacha ranks 7th at 60.6% at getting his shot on net behind Frederic (68.3), DeBrusk (67.3), Nosek (66.2), Greer (65.4), Foligno (62.0), and Coyle (61.5).

Frederic, with just 101 attempted shots and Zacha should both be shooting more.
Neither of em get PP time too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigGoalBrad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad