Value of: - Patrik Laine 50% retained | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Value of: Patrik Laine 50% retained

Attachments

  • 1af.jpg
    1af.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 3
Montreal shots for with Laine on the ice : 197
Montreal shots against with Laine on the ice: 272

Montreal expected goals for with Laine on the ice: 19,59
Montreal expected goals against with Laine on the ice: 28,36

Montreal PP% before Laine: 20,8%
Montreal PP% at the end of the season: 20,9%.

Correlation does not equal causation. You're supposed to learn this at elementary school.
Laine helped our powerplay when he first came back, scored 10 goals in 13 games. He was big part of Habs 13 game Christmas heater
 
I really hope his agent or someone close to him makes it clear to him that he’ll be out of the league in a year if he can’t get his 5 on 5 game together and overall intensity.!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pth2
I forget the guy who covers montreal for TSN and was on TSN overdrive discussing Montreal’s season.

Essentially he touched on Laine and said the things that have changed for Laine, is he has heard from around the organization is that they have to “hide” him when he is in the lineup.

That’s different from a 4th line which is limited minutes around 11 minutes and they hope to have some offensive zone time, maybe draw a penalty, throw some hits, and maybe contribute offensively every now and then.

But Like when a player has the term attached to him with we have to “hide” him, it’s a serious problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pth2
I forget the guy who covers montreal for TSN and was on TSN overdrive discussing Montreal’s season.

Essentially he touched on Laine and said the things that have changed for Laine, is he has heard from around the organization is that they have to “hide” him when he is in the lineup.

That’s different from a 4th line which is limited minutes around 11 minutes and they hope to have some offensive zone time, maybe draw a penalty, throw some hits, and maybe contribute offensively every now and then.

But Like when a player has the term attached to him with we have to “hide” him, it’s a serious problem.
It fits with his play and his usage.

His bad play 5 on 5 was part of the playoff overtime loss.
 
You will need to tie your two 2025 first picks after him to interest someone to get rid of him
 
You will need to tie your two 2025 first picks after him to interest someone to get rid of him
That's the dumbest thing i have ever heard. Habs, how have no cap issues, need to add 2 x 1sts to trade Laine, who has 1 x year remaining. LOL

Habs got a 2nd round pick for taking on Laine. He will play one more year then he will be let go. If he gets his knee fixed, he might actually be productive.
 
Idiotic to think the Habs would pay to dump Laine when they don't have cap issues and Laine may be useful if he gets his knee fixed.

People are really clueless...

Yeah inconceivable for it to happen considering it literally happened the last time he was traded. The Jackets added a 2nd with Laine to get rid of him. He's been benched since then. His value is not higher than it was last offseason. You're calling others clueless?
 
He still has a NTC, not sure that'll ever work out.
It’s not a No Move Clause. So the Habs could just waive him and send him to the minors. Imo that’s what they should do. It’s only one season. Keep him away from the Habs room.
 
Yeah inconceivable for it to happen considering it literally happened the last time he was traded. The Jackets added a 2nd with Laine to get rid of him. He's been benched since then. His value is not higher than it was last offseason. You're calling others clueless?
Habs don’t ned to trade him. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeune Poulet
No the point was, he would probably block a trade to Winnipeg.
Understood. No club will want him, even at 50% retention, unless the Habs add or take back a bad contract. So just bury him in the AHL.
 
Whether it's the knee he chose not to get surgically repaired in the fall, or systemic issues between the ears, there's no reason to incentivize another club to take him. He's got a year left and they're not financially pressed to get rid of him.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad