bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 9,225
- 9,672
Are you high?Find the next three biggest assets you have (one of which must be Lafreniere) and attach those to Kravstov and that 1st... or Fox, 1st, and Kravstov.
Are you high?Find the next three biggest assets you have (one of which must be Lafreniere) and attach those to Kravstov and that 1st... or Fox, 1st, and Kravstov.
Kane is insanely good, I don't understand how people are underestimating him. He's easily worth 2 1st's and a b prospect to a good team.
This would be with retention of about 3 mil through the next 2 years.
Are you high?
He is worth more than thatKane is insanely good, I don't understand how people are underestimating him. He's easily worth 2 1st's and a b prospect to a good team.
This would be with retention of about 3 mil through the next 2 years.
You're not seriously asking me if I was comparing Strome to those players are you?
It was clearly meant to refute the claim that Strome wasn't a solid asset...
Your offer was one of the worst serious offers I’ve seen on this website. Congrats on the achievementRyan Strome had a higher PPG average last season than Brayden Point, Jack Eichel, Evgeni Malkin, Mathew Barzal, and Elias Pettersson
And Kravtsov is a speedy 21 year old winger with loads of offensive potential
You don't have to like the proposal, but it serves no purpose to be disingenuous about the value of the incoming players
Patrick Kane makes zero sense for the Rangers. On the wrong side of 30 and a huge cap hit and that’s not even mentioning what the asking price might be.
No thanks.
I’d explore a trade for Dylan Strome depending on what the asking price would be.
Your offer was one of the worst serious offers I’ve seen on this website. Congrats on the achievement
He’s really not as a trade asset.
Yet, I’m not the one getting destroyedYour reply was one of the worst serious replies I've seen on this website. Congrats on the achievement
Yet, I’m not the one getting destroyed
Well, I guess if you've decided that, it must be true...
Lol, no one is going touching any 2010 Blackhawk asset right now at any price.Are you high?
No.Lol, no one is going touching any 2010 Blackhawk asset right now at any price.
Just a silly statementLol, no one is going touching any 2010 Blackhawk asset right now at any price.
The Trouba contract, huh?Agree except last sentence.
We are already looking to unload one Strome we can't afford, we should not be adding the other.
That price is a little too steep on draft picks. If NYR were trading for Kane, I'd imagine prospects were included. I don't think they trade away Kreider. Organization seems to love him. What's Strome's value in this trade?Now with the circumstances in Chicago .Kane may ask for a trade to get away from the turmoil and allegations .Plus the team struggles and that things don't look promising with the current standings .He may ask to be traded to a contender or a team with more upside.
NYR
Patrick Kane
Dylan Strome
CHI
2022 1st round pick and 2nd round pick
2023 1st round pick and 3rd round pick
Chris Krieder
If Trouba current play (under a new coach) continues through-out the season, we won't be too concerned with the cap hit, at least for now. He's been very good. If it doesn't continue, yeah, we'll be back to pounding our fist at that one.The Trouba contract, huh?
can you by futures on toughness?Rangers are not gonna add age. PERIOD
if/when we deal Krav, it will be for futures
we need cap mgmt for long term Fox, Laf, Kakko extensions
I'd make a deal similar to that.Kane is insanely good, I don't understand how people are underestimating him. He's easily worth 2 1st's and a b prospect to a good team.
This would be with retention of about 3 mil through the next 2 years.
But he was a 5OA pick. Ryan looks good in your colors.Agree except last sentence.
We are already looking to unload one Strome we can't afford, we should not be adding the other.
But he was a 5OA pick. Ryan looks good in your colors.
I'd rather acquire Toews. NYR could use his faceoff, PK prowess, and leadership.
Chytil
Kravtsov
2022 1st
2022 2nd
the 2022 2nd becomes a 2023 first if Chi retains some.