I wonder who delivered the bag to the alleged victim's mother's house. A samaritan blowing the whistle concerning evidence tampering, or a bad actor sending a hostile message. I wouldn't be surprised with either, but I doubt we'll ever know.
Is this real? Has it been substantiated the bag is what it is claimed to be - i.e., that it is authentic? and therefore, that evidence has lost chain of control and/or been tampered with?
Secondly, assuming it's authentic, what's the motive to drop it at the mother's house?
If the evidence was stolen by the Kane side / cohorts, isn't that inflammatory/sensationalism to drop it at the mother's house, rather than just burying/destroying it? [Further, if it has been stolen with intent of legal gain, why not keep it quiet, and ask at the trial if chain-of-control can be verified and with proof the evidence is still in possession of the authorities?]
If the evidence was stolen by a whistle-blower, to show that chain-of-control procedures are lax, then why not deliver it to a neutral party or media?
If stolen by the victim's side, or the theft is fabricated, that seems a very risky strategy, doesn't it?
My questions re: motive above are regardless of the value of such evidence. Even if there is minimal value of the evidence in terms of a potential conviction, I'm still unclear as to motive.
Lastly, if this is true, any chance this is linked to the allegation there was no semen in the rape kit? (because it was removed or the kit was stolen before all contents were examined / tested)
something smells fishy here...