PlamsUnlimited
Big Church Bells
Team playing disinterested and flat. Definitely a coaching system problem as well as the players aren't playing for one another. They're just....lost
I thought we played well, we were just fairly unlucky. Two of those bounces that laid in the crease for seconds at a time go in and we talk about how the 3-2 score doesn't reflect how badly we dominated them.
Some of you guys need a reality check. Not everyone played well, but we were hungry on the puck and we exposed their bad defense.
They could and they didn't. Not sure what you're getting at here.
Logically speaking, they could have. Get off your high horseWhat happened? I thought you said they could come back from being down 2-0
Kronwall decapitated him . I thought Nash hit him in the numbers personally
You're really not sure what I'm getting at?
This is not a team issue.
44 shots to, what, 23. The effort and the skill is there.
It really has become a coaching issue at this point. When the team was losing to Pittsburgh, Winnipeg, etc, the effort and skill wasn't there...but, tonight, it was, and they still lost to an inferior team. This was an extremely winnable game.
Lundqvist giving up a soft goal doesn't help. The Panthers controlled play for maybe 5 minutes in that entire game. The Rangers had the puck 90% of the time. Lundqvist can't be giving up goals like that when the Rangers are playing as well as they were.
Just a deflating, disappointing loss when we needed a win the most.
It sounds like you're criticizing me for having the audacity to believe that we could comeback.
Sadly, I don't doubt you. I guess I'm just holding the $12M dollar man to a higher standard.. Plus, I hate him.Richards looked lost on that play, but look at it again. Del Zotto was there too. Nobody did much.
Logically speaking, they could have. Get off your high horse
This is not a team issue.
44 shots to, what, 23. The effort and the skill is there.
It really has become a coaching issue at this point. When the team was losing to Pittsburgh, Winnipeg, etc, the effort and skill wasn't there...but, tonight, it was, and they still lost to an inferior team. This was an extremely winnable game.
Lundqvist giving up a soft goal doesn't help. The Panthers controlled play for maybe 5 minutes in that entire game. The Rangers had the puck 90% of the time. Lundqvist can't be giving up goals like that when the Rangers are playing as well as they were.
Just a deflating, disappointing loss when we needed a win the most.
Can the Rangers at least trade Boyle? I mean, do something that you're still serious about salvaging this season and being a contender.
Bingo. And guess who was right?
Who cares? It's like we could get anyone worth mentioning for him. And not having any center depth hurts too.
This is not a team issue.
44 shots to, what, 23. The effort and the skill is there.
It really has become a coaching issue at this point. When the team was losing to Pittsburgh, Winnipeg, etc, the effort and skill wasn't there...but, tonight, it was, and they still lost to an inferior team. This was an extremely winnable game.
Lundqvist giving up a soft goal doesn't help. The Panthers controlled play for maybe 5 minutes in that entire game. The Rangers had the puck 90% of the time. Lundqvist can't be giving up goals like that when the Rangers are playing as well as they were.
Just a deflating, disappointing loss when we needed a win the most.
This is not a team issue.
44 shots to, what, 23. The effort and the skill is there.
It really has become a coaching issue at this point. When the team was losing to Pittsburgh, Winnipeg, etc, the effort and skill wasn't there...but, tonight, it was, and they still lost to an inferior team. This was an extremely winnable game.
Lundqvist giving up a soft goal doesn't help. The Panthers controlled play for maybe 5 minutes in that entire game. The Rangers had the puck 90% of the time. Lundqvist can't be giving up goals like that when the Rangers are playing as well as they were.
Just a deflating, disappointing loss when we needed a win the most.
Bingo. And guess who was right?