He's a #1 dman and should be paid like it. Should he really have the 4th highest contract on the team among dmen? Is that fair?
Of course not and no one could really argue the opposite...
I've said this several times, but whenever this does get resolved...PK Subban is going to go back to playing 25+ mins a game, vs the oppositions best players, he'll be on the 1st wave of the PP, 1st wave of the PK, late game situations, OT 4 on 4 he'll be the go to dman, etc.
So how can they really justifiy paying him like he's their #3 or #4 dman? Because he's young and immature and needs to prove it?
Let's just say he does sign this 'bridge deal'...how much do you think he's going to ask THEN?
IMO, the Habs are missing on an opportunity to lock up their #1 dman who plays in all situations at a bargain price for the long term...
The more this situation drags on...the more I realize that MB's is maybe misevaluating Subban
Locking up Subban is as much as a no-brainer as Price and Pacioretty was...maybe even moreso