it's not the WJC and WJC18 numbers.
Where was Laine's "drastic improvement" this year? Worse PPG, more reliant on the PP for production than his rookie year.
Based on your age logic, Crosby > Gretzky for their 18 year old years. Gretzky must have had some legendary development from 19 onwards.
1979-80 | Edmonton Oilers | NHL | 79 gp | 51 goals | 86 assists | 137 points |
2005-06 | Pittsburgh Penguins | NHL | 81 gp | 39 goals | 63 assists | 102 points |
Where was Laine's "drastic improvement" this year? Worse PPG, more reliant on the PP for production than his rookie year.
Based on your age logic, Crosby > Gretzky for their 18 year old years. Gretzky must have had some legendary development from 19 onwards.
Just to put a counterspin on your dumb argument.
So 100 points this year from Laine? or at least 3rd in overall league scoring? I mean Ovy did that as 20 year old rookie as his first time in the North American league, Laine has now 2 seasons of experience in the league putting him well ahead of Ovechkin in terms of NHL experience at the same age. He can at least amount to 3rd in overall scoring right? Would only take about 100 points per last season on a significantly better team with significantly better line mates.
No? That's what I thought.
Last season Laine was about 7 months younger than Ovechkin was during his rookie season.
Last season Laine scored 44 goals and had 70 points on a team that scored 273 goals
In 05-06 Ovechkin scored 52 goals and had 106 points on a team that scored 230 goals
But yea, Laine has totally been "much better" than Ovechkin so far.
Just to put a counterspin on your dumb argument.
So 100 points this year from Laine? or at least 3rd in overall league scoring? I mean Ovy did that as 20 year old rookie as his first time in the North American league, Laine has now 2 seasons of experience in the league putting him well ahead of Ovechkin in terms of NHL experience at the same age. He can at least amount to 3rd in overall scoring right? Would only take about 100 points per last season on a significantly better team with significantly better line mates.
No? That's what I thought.
Aside from having that big one timer they aren't very similar. Laine is all finesse and ovechkin is a truck on skates.
80 goals for Laine before Ovechkin scored 1 goal in the NHL.
I'm not entirely sure if Ovechkin would have gotten 64 points in 73 games at age 18.Does anyone really think that if given the same opportunity Ovechkin wouldn't have put up better numbers than Laine at the same age?
Just YouTube Alex Ovechkin rookie highlights case closed
I agree with idea. Laine is a goal scorer. He will probably never be the goal scorer ovechkin was to start with.Laine is not really even close to Ovechkin at a similar age. More comparable to Steve Stamkos.
Alex was exponentially more dynamic and complete a player. Didn't play on loaded teams like Stamkos and Laine so he really had to drive all the offense he got.
Remarkable on a "only 1 or 2 rookies a year accomplish something similar". Ovechkin was more of a "only 1 or 2 rookies a decade" sort of player.If Laine scores 50 this year the comparisons are totally legit in terms of goal scoring. People are just assuming a 19 yearold has plateaued at 44 goals. What he's done in the nhl as a teenager is remarkable.