Ovechkin scores 2 goals in 30 seconds but nope

[illpucks]

To tie the game
But no goal according to refs. Agree or disagree.

Click to read more...

 

[Pavels Dog]

Throwing the puck into the net is not a legal goal so I don't know what discussion can be had.

 

[Sky04]

Canadian refs... obviously biased agai...oh wait.

 

[missionAvs]

Yeah that second goal..... was no goal. Not in any way, shape, or form enough conclusive evidence that the puck went off his stick after he gloved it. Good call.

 

[Sojourn]

I thought the call was good. Ref said no, and the video replay was definitely not conclusive.

 

[hockeykicker]

will say this though, ovechkin wouldnt have acted that way unless he really thought he hit it.

 

[SotasicA]

I thought Kulemin redirected the first goal. And the second one was a hand goal, good call.

 

[Apari]

The puck seemed to hit ovys stick on its way down but I have to say I agree with the result. It was inconclusive so no way the refs call could have been overturn.

 

[Bixby Snyder]

Homer refs sez no to Ovy.

 

[Erik Alfredsson]

That was for sure a goal, don't know what the refs were thinking.

 

[dechire]

will say this though, ovechkin wouldnt have acted that way unless he really thought he hit it.

Really ? Players sell bs all the time in the NHL

 

[hockeykicker]

Really ? Players sell bs all the time in the NHL

doesnt seem like he is trying to sell it

 

[Ezekial]

The rotation factor was real, but it's unknown who caused the puck to do it. Looked to me like it happened passing Ovi's stick but I don't see any possible way they could overturn it. Just like if it was called a goal on the ice.

I was hoping it would be a goal FWIW

 

[Steven1562]

Anyone got video of the no goal? I missed it.

 

[lakai17]

Inconclusive.

That puck was knuckle balling in and could have tapped the stick on the way in.

 

[Crosbyfan]

Any video of the no goal?

 

[hockeykicker]

Anyone got video of the no goal? I missed it.

 

[Confucius]

What can you do, Russia was robbed. However since it was Russia, who cares.

 

[Sorey*]

looks like it doesnt hit his stick. Good call Canada.

I am sorry that I complained on canadian refs earlier. I will never complain again.

 

[JayGould]

What can you do, Russia was robbed. However since it was Russia, who cares.

Yeah bro, Russia should've won this match. 5-0. All ref's fault.

 

[Stuzchuk]

that no goal,

no conclusive evidence that the stick hits the puck after it was batted down by Ovi's hand

 

[illpucks]

that no goal,

no conclusive evidence that the stick hits the puck after it was batted down by Ovi's hand

They really should have better zoom in. So they can pinpoint either it hits or not with 100% accuracy.

 

[Ezekial]

 

[Sojourn]

will say this though, ovechkin wouldnt have acted that way unless he really thought he hit it.

Oh, I'm sure that's true for the most part. My issue is that I don't think we can trust his actions as evidence. Just because he felt his stick touch something doesn't mean it was the puck. His stick looked like it came in contact with Stralman and the post. How is he to know if what he felt was the puck?

 

[Sorey*]

They really should have better zoom in. So they can pinpoint either it hits or not with 100% accuracy.

I am sure the war room in Toronto got all equipment for that