HF Habs: Out of Town Thread: 2024-2025 season

OnTheRun

/dev/null
May 17, 2014
12,835
11,614

The next CBA could very much mark the end of the "legal" hit to the head.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,019
11,660

The next CBA could very much mark the end of the "legal" hit to the head.
Considering the amount of fined head hits and boarding that didn't get a penalty in-game the last two seasons...won't change anything. Refs are too incompetent to enforce anything.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,269
20,574
Quebec City, Canada
Considering the amount of fined head hits and boarding that didn't get a penalty in-game the last two seasons...won't change anything. Refs are too incompetent to enforce anything.
Only way to cut down on head hit is to suspend players more. The NRL plays one game a week on the weekend and there's usually between 3 and 5 suspensions every week, Almost any illegal hit is a suspension.
 

OnTheRun

/dev/null
May 17, 2014
12,835
11,614
Considering the amount of fined head hits and boarding that didn't get a penalty in-game the last two seasons...won't change anything. Refs are too incompetent to enforce anything.

They are enforcing the rule the way it is written, which make most head hit legal, the only illegal one are the blindsided and the "targeted".

48.1 Illegal Check to the Head – A hit resulting in contact with an
opponent’s head where the head was the main point of contact and
such contact to the head was avoidable is not permitted.
In determining whether contact with an opponent's head was
avoidable, the circumstances of the hit including the following shall be
considered:
(i) Whether the player attempted to hit squarely through the
opponent’s body and the head was not "picked" as a result of poor
timing, poor angle of approach, or unnecessary extension of the
body upward or outward.
(ii) Whether the opponent put himself in a vulnerable position by
assuming a posture that made head contact on an otherwise full
body check unavoidable.
(iii) Whether the opponent materially changed the position of his body
or head immediately prior to or simultaneously with the hit in a way
that significantly contributed to the head contact.

If it gain traction the PA will probably push for a rule similar to the IIHF, where all hit to the head are illegal, period.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,269
20,574
Quebec City, Canada
They are enforcing the rule the way it is written, which make most head hit legal, the only illegal one are the blindsided and the "targeted".



If it gain traction the PA will probably push for a rule similar to the IIHF, where all hit to the head are illegal, period.
One of the thing that needs to change in the NHL is the old excuse "it's going fast". Pro athletes have incredible reaction time. eSports guys too. We're talking between 100ms and 250ms. When a player hit another player in a vulnerable position we should at least see an intention, a reflex, trying to diminsing the severity of the contact. With the abscence of said intention it should be an automatic suspension.
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,737
12,057
They are enforcing the rule the way it is written, which make most head hit legal, the only illegal one are the blindsided and the "targeted".



If it gain traction the PA will probably push for a rule similar to the IIHF, where all hit to the head are illegal, period.
The NHL rule is garbage. It should always have been the same rule as IIHF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morhilane

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,737
12,057
Jennifer Botterill slammed by fans after heated exchange on Hockey Night in Canada. - HockeyFeed
She is right that it shouldn't be necessary but wrong that things are changing. Walsh should insist on severe penalties for head hits. The suspension should not come with loss of pay though. Hopefully players who get multiple suspensions can't get jobs because teams aren't going to want to pay them to sit in the stands.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,812
37,120

The next CBA could very much mark the end of the "legal" hit to the head.
Means hitting is out if they go that way, as there are a lot of "clean" Hite that just catch the head.


The ironic thing is in the next CBA they'll likely go with more severe punishments for hits to the head if deemed requiring supplemental discipline, which in turn will have the PA defending that play saying it isn't that bad and just downplaying hits to the head.
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
21,948
25,808
That would be a player that would help the habs, but don't see the good trading partners part as buffalo would not be interested in futures.

Roy, Savard and 1st

I would trade Matheson instead, but I don't think we can fool them.
 

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
39,785
22,062
What about Nikita Prishchepov, a 7th round pick in the last draft who played his 1st with Colorado this weekend. 3rd player of the 2024 draft to play a game after Celebrini and Luchenko

What about him?

The Avs sure like bad Euros imports from the Q like him and Ivan Ivan.
 

Oryxo

Registered User
Oct 24, 2007
123
315

The next CBA could very much mark the end of the "legal" hit to the head.
Punishing hits where players crouch to explode upward with their legs would really help to reduce the amount of head contact because even if the initial point of contact is in the chest, they end up sliding upward in the head if they aren't timed perfectly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad